Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Millis Middle
District not selectedDistricts School selectedSchools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Millis Middle
Organization Information
District:Millis (01870000)School type:Middle School
School:Millis Middle (01870020)Grades served:05,06,07,08
Region:Greater BostonTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91.2, Target = 96.2 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 91.2, Target = 96.2 75 or Higher All Students 93.4 89.9 91.2 1.3 96.2 96.7 5544150Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 77.6, Target = 90.3 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 77.6, Target = 90.3 75 or Higher High needs 83.3 71.9 77.6 5.7 90.3 91.7 369550Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 85.4, Target = 82.9 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-CPI = 85.4, Target = 82.9CPI = 85.4, Target = 82.975 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 81.3 81.3 85.4 4.1 82.9 90.7 5853100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 64.5, Target = 84 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 64.5, Target = 84 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 72.5 58.9 64.5 5.6 84.0 86.3 365550Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------11--
Afr. Amer./Black -------7--
Hispanic/Latino -------20--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 91.2, Target = 96.3 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 91.2, Target = 96.3 75 or Higher White 93.7 90.1 91.2 1.1 96.3 96.9 4439350Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 83.7, Target = 88.6 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 83.7, Target = 88.6 75 or Higher All Students 80.5 82.7 83.7 1.0 88.6 90.3 6644250Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 65.4, Target = 80 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 65.4, Target = 80 75 or Higher High needs 65.7 60.3 65.4 5.1 80.0 82.9 619650Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 74.5, Target = 71.4 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-CPI = 74.5, Target = 71.4CPI = 74.5, Target = 71.475 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 68.8 68.8 74.5 5.7 71.4 84.4 7653100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 52.7, Target = 72.3 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 52.7, Target = 72.3 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 52.5 50.0 52.7 2.7 72.3 76.3 595650Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------11--
Afr. Amer./Black -------7--
Hispanic/Latino -------20--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 83.9, Target = 88.5 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 83.9, Target = 88.5 75 or Higher White 80.3 82.8 83.9 1.1 88.5 90.2 5839450Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 80.9, Target = 90.6 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 80.9, Target = 90.6 75 or Higher All Students 83.8 80.4 80.9 0.5 90.6 91.9 7422650Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 71.5, Target = 84.4 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 71.5, Target = 84.4 75 or Higher High needs 73.3 60.6 71.5 10.9 84.4 86.7 905075On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 76.4, Target = 67.7 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-CPI = 76.4, Target = 67.7CPI = 76.4, Target = 67.775 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 64.8 64.8 76.4 11.6 67.7 82.4 9435100Above Target
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 59.1, Target = 77.3 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 59.1, Target = 77.3 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 61.1 53.4 59.1 5.7 77.3 80.6 752250Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 81.8, Target = 90.8 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 81.8, Target = 90.8 75 or Higher White 84.3 80.3 81.8 1.5 90.8 92.2 6820250Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 13.0 15.244125 4.3 3.444125
High needs 4.2 6.39525 17.7 14.79525
Econ. Disadvantaged 4.2 9.45325 14.6 7.55325
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities 3.4 1.8550 27.1 25.5550
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--11---11-
Afr. Amer./Black--7---7-
Hispanic/Latino--20---20-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--9---9-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 12.9 15.339325 4.6 3.839325
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 26.6 24.74420 8.9 8.44420
High needs 9.3 10.49625 30.9 26.09625
Econ. Disadvantaged 14.6 13.2530 20.8 15.15325
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities 3.3 5.45625 43.3 39.3560
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--11---11-
Afr. Amer./Black--7---7-
Hispanic/Latino--20---20-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--9---9-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 26.7 25.63940 8.9 8.63940
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 7.2 10.622625 6.3 7.52260
High needs 1.9 6.05025 21.2 18.05025
Econ. Disadvantaged 3.7 8.63525 18.5 11.43525
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0220 27.6 31.8220
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--14---14-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 7.4 10.920225 6.3 5.92020
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 52, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 52, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 50.0 52.0 2.0 51.0Yes43575On Target
High needsSGP = 46, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 46, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 39.0 46.0 7.0 51.0Yes9375On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 55, Target = 51 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 5175 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 41.0 55.0 14.0 51.0Yes5275On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 35, Target = 51 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities SGP = 35, Target = 51 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 34.0 35.0 1.0 51.0Yes5475On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-10--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-7--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-20--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 50.5, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 50.5, Target = 5175 or Higher White 48.0 50.5 2.5 51.0Yes38875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 46, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 46, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 41.0 46.0 5.0 51.0No43750Below Target
High needsSGP = 41, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 41, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 42.0 41.0 -1.0 51.0Yes9475On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 53.5, Target = 51 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-SGP = 53.5, Target = 51SGP = 53.5, Target = 5175 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 41.0 53.5 12.5 51.0Yes5275On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 37, Target = 51 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities SGP = 37, Target = 51 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 42.0 37.0 -5.0 51.0No5525Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-10--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-7--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-20--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 46.5, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 46.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 41.0 46.5 5.5 51.0No39050Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students450448100Yes451450100Yes230229100Yes
High needs10210098Yes10210199Yes535298Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged5656100Yes5656100Yes3636100Yes
EL and Former EL2---2---1---
Students w/ disabilities585697Yes585798Yes232296Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian11---12---3---
Afr. Amer./Black9---9---4---
Hispanic/Latino21---21---15---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.10---10---4---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.1---1-------
White39839699Yes398397100Yes204203100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles