Massachusetts School and District Profiles

John T. Nichols Middle

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - John T. Nichols Middle

Organization Information

District:

Middleborough (01820000)

School type:

Middle School

School:

John T. Nichols Middle (01820305)

Grades served:

06,07,08

Region:

Southeast

Title I status:

Non-Title I School (NT)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		88.0	87.5	88.8	1.3	93.0	94.0	43	761	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		77.9	78.2	78.8	0.6	87.1	89.0	42	295	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		84.1	84.1	83.7	-0.4	85.4	92.1	50	199	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		65.3	64.3	68.2	3.9	79.8	82.7	47	148	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		82.3	85.7	91.1	5.4	89.7	91.2	86	31	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	17	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		88.6	87.9	88.9	1.0	93.4	94.3	29	692	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		69.8	71.5	74.8	3.3	82.4	84.9	35	758	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		56.1	58.4	59.9	1.5	74.4	78.1	34	294	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		65.3	65.3	64.4	-0.9	68.2	82.7	36	198	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		45.0	42.1	46.3	4.2	67.9	72.5	38	148	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		68.8	70.6	71.0	0.4	81.8	84.4	69	31	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	17	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		70.4	72.5	75.2	2.7	82.7	85.2	23	689	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		68.5	71.1	69.9	-1.2	81.6	84.3	34	243	25	No Change
High needs		60.3	62.6	58.5	-4.1	76.8	80.2	37	97	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		66.5	66.5	59.0	-7.5	69.3	83.3	35	67	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		56.9	54.0	51.0	-3.0	74.9	78.5	47	50	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		69.2	73.2	70.8	-2.4	82.0	84.6	19	218	25	No Change

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	12.7	11.8	761	0	4.9	6.2	761	0
High needs	3.8	4.4	295	25	11.0	13.6	295	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	5.2	5.5	199	0	7.5	8.0	199	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Students w/ disabilities	1.3	1.4	148	0	21.5	22.3	148	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Asian	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Hispanic/Latino	5.7	9.7	31	25	2.9	3.2	31	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	17	-	-	-	17	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	13.5	12.1	692	0	4.8	6.1	692	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	15.0	14.9	758	0	20.4	19.4	758	0
High needs	4.7	5.8	294	25	35.0	36.4	294	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	6.6	8.1	198	25	25.5	30.3	198	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.7	0.7	148	0	57.7	54.1	148	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Asian	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Hispanic/Latino	5.9	19.4	31	25	17.6	25.8	31	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	17	-	-	-	17	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	15.9	15.1	689	0	19.3	18.9	689	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	2.3	2.5	243	0	15.5	14.8	243	0
High needs	1.0	1.0	97	0	28.6	26.8	97	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	1.5	1.5	67	0	23.1	28.4	67	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	50	0	42.0	36.0	50	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	2.7	2.8	218	0	13.5	13.3	218	0

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		49.0	53.0	4.0	51.0	Yes	743	75	On Target
High needs		46.0	50.0	4.0	51.0	No	277	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		46.0	48.0	2.0	51.0	No	190	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		50.0	56.0	6.0	51.0	Yes	131	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	7	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	10	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		43.5	52.5	9.0	51.0	Yes	30	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	17	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		50.0	53.0	3.0	51.0	Yes	675	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		45.0	47.0	2.0	51.0	Yes	740	75	On Target
High needs		45.0	45.0	0.0	51.0	No	276	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		43.0	43.0	0.0	51.0	No	190	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		47.0	48.0	1.0	51.0	No	131	50	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	10	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		47.0	39.0	-8.0	51.0	Yes	30	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	17	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		45.0	47.0	2.0	51.0	Yes	673	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	2.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	2.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	2.00	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	780	774	99	Yes	780	771	99	Yes	254	250	98	Yes
High needs	307	303	99	Yes	307	302	98	Yes	105	103	98	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	208	205	99	Yes	208	204	98	Yes	73	71	97	Yes
EL and Former EL	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	155	153	99	Yes	155	153	99	Yes	54	54	100	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	7	-	-	-	7	-	-	-	6	-	-	-
Asian	4	-	-	-	4	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	10	-	-	-	10	-	-	-	3	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	32	32	100	Yes	32	32	100	Yes	9	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	18	-	-	-	18	-	-	-	8	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	709	703	99	Yes	709	700	99	Yes	228	224	98	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.