Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Winthrop

View selected organization
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Winthrop

Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 92.7, Target = 96.7 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 92.7, Target = 96.7 75 or Higher All Students 94.4 95.9 92.7 -3.2 96.7 97.2 8316275On Target
High needsCPI = 77.9, Target = 90.5 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 77.9, Target = 90.5 75 or Higher High needs 83.7 87.2 77.9 -9.3 90.5 91.9 62350Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------14--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 74, Target = 81.9 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 74, Target = 81.9 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 69.0 83.7 74.0 -9.7 81.9 84.5 75250Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------9--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 93.1, Target = 97.4 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 93.1, Target = 97.4 75 or Higher White 95.5 96.4 93.1 -3.3 97.4 97.8 8014275On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 92.6, Target = 94.8 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 92.6, Target = 94.8 75 or Higher All Students 91.1 95.1 92.6 -2.5 94.8 95.6 8216275On Target
High needsCPI = 77.1, Target = 83.5 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 77.1, Target = 83.5 75 or Higher High needs 71.7 85.8 77.1 -8.7 83.5 85.9 55350Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------14--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 76, Target = 84.8 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 76, Target = 84.8 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 73.9 82.7 76.0 -6.7 84.8 87.0 79250Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------9--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 93.5, Target = 96 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 93.5, Target = 96 75 or Higher White 93.2 95.5 93.5 -2.0 96.0 96.6 8114275On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91.9, Target = 95.6 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 91.9, Target = 95.6 75 or Higher All Students 92.5 96.8 91.9 -4.9 95.6 96.3 9043100Above Target
High needs -------11--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------6--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 92.1, Target = 97.5 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 92.1, Target = 97.5 75 or Higher White 95.7 97.2 92.1 -5.1 97.5 97.9 8438100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 35.8 30.21620 2.0 3.71620
High needs 10.8 11.4350 8.1 11.4350
Econ. Disadvantaged--14---14-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities 7.7 0.0250 11.5 16.0250
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--9---9-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--6---6-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 37.0 28.91420 1.4 3.51420
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 59.5 48.81620 2.7 3.71620
High needs 43.2 17.1350 10.8 17.1350
Econ. Disadvantaged--14---14-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities 38.5 12.0250 15.4 20.0250
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--9---9-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--6---6-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 60.1 47.91420 2.2 2.81420
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 38.3 48.84325 0.0 4.7430
High needs--11---11-
Econ. Disadvantaged--6---6-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--7---7-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 40.0 44.73825 0.0 5.3380
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 38, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 38, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 67.5 38.0 -29.5 51.0No10025Below Target
High needs --- 51.0-20--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-8--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 37.5, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 37.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 67.5 37.5 -30.0 51.0No9225Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 34, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 34, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 70.5 34.0 -36.5 51.0No10025Below Target
High needs --- 51.0-20--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-8--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 33, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 33, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 70.5 33.0 -37.5 51.0No9225Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.03.00-
High needs- 60.03.00-
EL and Former EL- 60.03.00-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students163163100Yes163163100Yes4444100Yes
High needs3535100Yes3535100Yes11---
Econ. Disadvantaged14---14---6---
EL and Former EL1---1-------
Students w/ disabilities2525100Yes2525100Yes7---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian3---3---1---
Afr. Amer./Black10---10---2---
Hispanic/Latino2---2-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.6---6---3---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White142142100Yes142142100Yes3838100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.


School and District Profiles