Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Lincoln
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Lincoln
Organization Information
District:Melrose (01780000)School type:Elementary School
School:Lincoln (01780020)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 88.6, Target = 92.6CPI = 88.6, Target = 92.6CPI = 88.6, Target = 92.6 87.3 92.1 88.6 -3.5 92.6 93.7 651760Declined
High needsCPI = 79.9, Target = 86.4CPI = 79.9, Target = 86.4CPI = 79.9, Target = 86.4 76.7 85.1 79.9 -5.2 86.4 88.4 70820Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 79.8, Target = 87CPI = 79.8, Target = 87CPI = 79.8, Target = 87 85.8 85.8 79.8 -6.0 87.0 92.9 64420Declined
EL and Former ELCPI = 82.8, Target = 82.6CPI = 82.8, Target = 82.6 81.0 81.0 82.8 1.8 82.6 90.5 842975On Target
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 71.7, Target = 82.1CPI = 71.7, Target = 82.1CPI = 71.7, Target = 82.1 69.3 81.1 71.7 -9.4 82.1 84.7 69380Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------13--
Afr. Amer./Black -------24--
Hispanic/Latino -------18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 91.6, Target = 91.8CPI = 91.6, Target = 91.8 86.0 95.1 91.6 -3.5 91.8 93.0 7011675On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 89.5, Target = 90.8CPI = 89.5, Target = 90.8CPI = 89.5, Target = 90.8 84.3 91.6 89.5 -2.1 90.8 92.2 6817725No Change
High needsCPI = 80.7, Target = 84.6CPI = 80.7, Target = 84.6CPI = 80.7, Target = 84.6 73.6 83.8 80.7 -3.1 84.6 86.8 71830Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 81, Target = 88.3CPI = 81, Target = 88.3CPI = 81, Target = 88.3 87.2 87.2 81.0 -6.2 88.3 93.6 70420Declined
EL and Former ELCPI = 84.5, Target = 86.3CPI = 84.5, Target = 86.3CPI = 84.5, Target = 86.3 85.0 85.0 84.5 -0.5 86.3 92.5 792925No Change
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 72.4, Target = 80.6CPI = 72.4, Target = 80.6CPI = 72.4, Target = 80.6 66.7 78.7 72.4 -6.3 80.6 83.4 71390Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------13--
Afr. Amer./Black -------24--
Hispanic/Latino -------18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 91, Target = 91.5CPI = 91, Target = 91.5 85.4 93.4 91.0 -2.4 91.5 92.7 6911775On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 84.7, Target = 89.9CPI = 84.7, Target = 89.9CPI = 84.7, Target = 89.9 82.7 87.2 84.7 -2.5 89.9 91.4 635925No Change
High needs  75.0---- 87.5-30--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------14--
EL and Former EL -------10--
Students w/ disabilities -------15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------7--
Afr. Amer./Black -------11--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 85.7, Target = 88.2CPI = 85.7, Target = 88.2CPI = 85.7, Target = 88.2 79.8 87.5 85.7 -1.8 88.2 89.9 533525No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 29.1 25.61760 2.5 3.41760
High needs 8.1 11.08225 5.4 4.9820
Econ. Disadvantaged 13.5 14.3420 5.4 7.1420
EL and Former EL 12.0 10.3290 12.0 3.42925
Students w/ disabilities 2.4 5.33825 9.8 10.5380
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--13---13-
Afr. Amer./Black--24---24-
Hispanic/Latino--18---18-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 37.3 29.31160 1.0 0.911625
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 41.1 45.817725 2.5 4.51770
High needs 17.6 24.18325 5.4 8.4830
Econ. Disadvantaged 13.5 19.04225 5.4 7.1420
EL and Former EL 20.0 27.62925 4.0 6.9290
Students w/ disabilities 14.6 17.93925 7.3 12.8390
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--13---13-
Afr. Amer./Black--24---24-
Hispanic/Latino--18---18-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 48.0 47.91170 1.0 5.11170
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 17.0 13.6590 2.1 5.1590
High needs--30---30-
Econ. Disadvantaged--14---14-
EL and Former EL--10---10-
Students w/ disabilities--15---15-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--7---7-
Afr. Amer./Black--11---11-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 19.4 14.3350 2.8 5.7350
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51 66.0 42.0 -24.0 51.0No11350Below Target
High needsSGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51 59.5 39.0 -20.5 51.0No5325Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-27--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-16--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 35, Target = 51SGP = 35, Target = 51SGP = 35, Target = 51 54.5 35.0 -19.5 51.0No2725Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-7--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-20--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51 65.5 48.0 -17.5 51.0No6750Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51 45.0 39.0 -6.0 51.0No11325Below Target
High needsSGP = 36, Target = 51SGP = 36, Target = 51SGP = 36, Target = 51 35.0 36.0 1.0 51.0No5350Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-27--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-16--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51 33.0 39.0 6.0 51.0No2750Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-7--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-20--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51 54.0 42.0 -12.0 51.0No6750Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 61.5 60.03425
High needs 61.5 60.03425
EL and Former EL 61.5 60.03425
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students18518499Yes186186100Yes6363100Yes
High needs898899Yes9090100Yes3434100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged4747100Yes4747100Yes16---
EL and Former EL3434100Yes3535100Yes14---
Students w/ disabilities403998Yes4040100Yes15---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian15---15---9---
Afr. Amer./Black25---26---12---
Hispanic/Latino18---18---3---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.5---5---3---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White12212199Yes122122100Yes3636100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles