Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Medford Vocational Technical High

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

This organization is currently closed.


2016 Accountability Data - Medford Vocational Technical High

Organization Information
District:Medford (01760000)School type:High School
School:Medford Vocational Technical High (01760605)Grades served:09,10,11,12
Region:Greater BostonTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 94.9, Target = 95.8CPI = 94.9, Target = 95.8 92.8 95.4 94.9 -0.5 95.8 96.4 195475On Target
High needsCPI = 93.6, Target = 96.4CPI = 93.6, Target = 96.4CPI = 93.6, Target = 96.4 93.8- 93.6 -1.2 96.4 96.9 423525No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged -------16--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities  95.0---- 97.5-27--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 94.5, Target = 96.4CPI = 94.5, Target = 96.4CPI = 94.5, Target = 96.4 93.8 94.0 94.5 0.5 96.4 96.9 44150Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 81, Target = 91.1CPI = 81, Target = 91.1CPI = 81, Target = 91.1 84.7 85.3 81.0 -4.3 91.1 92.4 14540Declined
High needsCPI = 76.4, Target = 90.5CPI = 76.4, Target = 90.5CPI = 76.4, Target = 90.5 83.7- 76.4 -11.1 90.5 91.9 25350Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------16--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities  84.0---- 92.0-27--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 79.9, Target = 92.5CPI = 79.9, Target = 92.5CPI = 79.9, Target = 92.5 87.2 83.7 79.9 -3.8 92.5 93.6 3410Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 77, Target = 84.7CPI = 77, Target = 84.7CPI = 77, Target = 84.7 73.7 78.1 77.0 -1.1 84.7 86.9 123825No Change
High needsCPI = 74, Target = 87.2CPI = 74, Target = 87.2CPI = 74, Target = 87.2 78.1- 74.0 -0.4 87.2 89.1 192625No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged -------12--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 71.7, Target = 85.4CPI = 71.7, Target = 85.4CPI = 71.7, Target = 85.4 75.0- 71.7 -6.6 85.4 87.5 3300Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 21.1 14.8540 0.0 0.05425
High needs 11.3 17.13525 0.0 0.03525
Econ. Disadvantaged--16---16-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--27---27-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 24.1 14.6410 0.0 0.04125
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 35.3 20.4540 8.8 13.0540
High needs 17.3 11.4350 3.8 17.1350
Econ. Disadvantaged--16---16-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--27---27-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 30.8 19.5410 11.5 12.2410
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 3.1 2.6380 3.1 5.3380
High needs 0.0 0.0260 2.4 7.7260
Econ. Disadvantaged--12---12-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--20---20-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 2.2 3.33025 0.0 6.7300
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51 60.5 39.0 -21.5 51.0No5125Below Target
High needsSGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51 59.0 34.0 -25.0 51.0No3325Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-15--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-25--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-6--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 37.5, Target = 51SGP = 37.5, Target = 51SGP = 37.5, Target = 51 55.0 37.5 -17.5 51.0No3825Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 50, Target = 51SGP = 50, Target = 51 59.0 50.0 -9.0 51.0No5150Below Target
High needsSGP = 50, Target = 51SGP = 50, Target = 51 64.5 50.0 -14.5 51.0No3350Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-15--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-25--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-6--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 51, Target = 51SGP = 51, Target = 51 57.0 51.0 -6.0 51.0No3875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 86.7, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 86.7, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 86.7, Target = 80 93.6 86.7 -6.9 80.0 90.04575On Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 90.6, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 90.6, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 90.6, Target = 80 90.6 90.6 0.0 80.0 90.03275On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 80.0 90.0---
EL and Former EL --- 80.0 90.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 80.0 90.012--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 80.0 90.01--
Asian --- 80.0 90.0---
Afr. Amer./Black --- 80.0 90.09--
Hispanic/Latino --- 80.0 90.03--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 80.0 90.0---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 80.0 90.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 81.3, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 81.3, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 81.3, Target = 80 92.9 81.3 -11.6 80.0 90.03275On Target
Summary > 2016
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2013 Rate 2014 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 93.6, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 93.6, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 93.6, Target = 85 88.9 93.6 4.7 85.0 95.04775On Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 90.6, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 90.6, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 90.6, Target = 85 87.5 90.6 3.1 85.0 95.03275On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 85.0 95.0---
EL and Former EL --- 85.0 95.01--
Students w/ disabilities --- 85.0 95.016--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Asian --- 85.0 95.01--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 85.0 95.02--
Hispanic/Latino --- 85.0 95.02--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 85.0 95.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 92.9, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 92.9, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 92.9, Target = 85 87.0 92.9 5.9 85.0 95.04275On Target
Summary > 2016
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
  0  2  4  6  8  10 12  14 16  18 20 Baseline Rate 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal Dropout Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsDropout Rate = 2.9, Target = 2.3 3.9 0.9 2.9 -2.0 2.3 2.0232060Declined
High needsDropout Rate = 1.7, Target = 2.2 3.8 1.5 1.7 -0.2 2.2 1.95511775On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------65--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilitiesDropout Rate = 0, Target = 0.6 1.1 1.9 0.0 1.9 0.6 0.68872--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------31--
Hispanic/Latino -------16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteDropout Rate = 2.7, Target = 1.8 3.1 1.2 2.7 -1.5 1.8 1.6161500Declined
Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more)
  2015 Number of Dropouts Reengaged PPI Points
All students--
High needs--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students5454100Yes5454100Yes5454100Yes
High needs3535100Yes3535100Yes3535100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged16---16---16---
EL and Former EL------------
Students w/ disabilities2727100Yes2727100Yes27---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian2---2---2---
Afr. Amer./Black6---6---6---
Hispanic/Latino3---3---3---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.2---2---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White4141100Yes4141100Yes4141100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles