Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Madeleine Dugger Andrews

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Madeleine Dugger Andrews

Organization Information

District:

Medford (01760000)

School type:

Middle School

School:

Madeleine Dugger Andrews (01760315)

Grades served:

06,07,08

Region:

Greater Boston

Title I status:

Non-Title I School (NT)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		84.6	88.7	90.1	1.4	91.0	92.3	49	465	75	On Target
High needs		75.6	78.4	78.5	0.1	85.8	87.8	41	171	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		85.9	85.9	80.6	-5.3	87.1	93.0	34	107	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		68.4	64.6	68.8	4.2	81.6	84.2	49	96	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		93.8	93.8	94.2	0.4	96.4	96.9	34	26	50	Improved Below Target
Afr. Amer./Black		79.7	81.6	79.4	-2.2	88.2	89.9	37	51	25	No Change
Hispanic/Latino		80.0	86.7	89.5	2.8	88.3	90.0	82	31	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	19	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White		86.2	89.7	91.0	1.3	92.0	93.1	42	336	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		70.1	75.4	78.7	3.3	82.6	85.1	48	465	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		57.7	60.4	59.1	-1.3	75.3	78.9	27	171	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		68.7	68.7	63.1	-5.6	71.3	84.4	30	107	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		43.8	44.7	45.6	0.9	67.2	71.9	34	96	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		85.0	96.4	93.3	-3.1	91.3	92.5	50	26	100	Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black		59.0	65.2	65.7	0.5	76.1	79.5	65	51	50	Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino		70.0	67.4	68.5	1.1	82.5	85.0	60	31	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	19	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White		72.3	76.5	80.6	4.1	83.8	86.2	45	336	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		63.1	74.0	75.4	1.4	78.5	81.6	52	136	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		50.6	61.9	61.4	-0.5	71.2	75.3	52	55	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		64.9	64.9	62.1	-2.8	67.8	82.5	50	33	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		42.9	49.3	50.8	1.5	66.7	71.5	45	33	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	17	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		63.9	77.6	75.3	-2.3	78.9	82.0	36	96	25	No Change

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	10.0	15.5	465	25	5.0	4.7	465	0
High needs	3.7	5.3	171	25	11.6	12.9	171	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	5.6	7.5	107	25	6.3	12.1	107	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	1.0	96	25	21.3	20.8	96	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	14.3	34.6	26	25	3.6	0.0	26	25
Afr. Amer./Black	5.3	13.7	51	25	7.0	15.7	51	0
Hispanic/Latino	3.1	9.7	31	25	6.3	3.2	31	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	19	-	-	-	19	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
White	10.7	14.3	336	25	4.6	3.9	336	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	21.1	23.0	465	0	15.0	15.1	465	0
High needs	7.4	6.4	171	0	30.5	34.5	171	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	9.5	7.5	107	0	17.5	31.8	107	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Students w/ disabilities	2.1	3.1	96	25	53.2	51.0	96	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	39.3	57.7	26	25	3.6	3.8	26	0
Afr. Amer./Black	5.4	5.9	51	0	26.8	31.4	51	0
Hispanic/Latino	12.1	3.2	31	0	12.1	12.9	31	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	19	-	-	-	19	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
White	22.8	24.4	336	0	13.9	13.4	336	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	4.2	6.6	136	25	16.8	14.0	136	25
High needs	0.0	0.0	55	0	27.5	29.1	55	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	0.0	0.0	33	0	24.6	30.3	33	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	33	0	43.2	45.5	33	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	17	-	-	-	17	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	5.2	6.3	96	25	12.9	14.6	96	0

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		50.5	54.5	4.0	51.0	Yes	458	75	On Target
High needs		50.0	49.0	-1.0	51.0	No	169	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		50.0	46.0	-4.0	51.0	No	106	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		50.0	49.0	-1.0	51.0	Yes	94	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		53.0	77.0	24.0	51.0	No	26	100	Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black		57.0	48.0	-9.0	51.0	Yes	51	75	On Target
Hispanic/Latino		57.5	52.0	-5.5	51.0	Yes	31	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	19	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
White		49.0	53.0	4.0	51.0	Yes	329	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		56.0	60.0	4.0	51.0	Yes	460	100	Above Target
High needs		54.0	55.0	1.0	51.0	No	169	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		57.0	56.0	-1.0	51.0	No	105	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		48.0	48.0	0.0	51.0	No	94	50	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		57.0	75.0	18.0	51.0	No	26	100	Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black		61.0	61.0	0.0	51.0	Yes	51	100	Above Target
Hispanic/Latino		66.0	51.0	-15.0	51.0	No	31	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	19	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
White		55.0	59.0	4.0	51.0	Yes	331	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	-	-
High needs	-	60.0	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	477	472	99	Yes	477	472	99	Yes	139	137	99	Yes
High needs	180	176	98	Yes	180	176	98	Yes	55	55	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	112	111	99	Yes	112	111	99	Yes	33	33	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	8	-	-	-	8	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	102	98	96	Yes	102	98	96	Yes	33	33	100	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Asian	27	26	96	Yes	27	26	96	Yes	8	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	55	55	100	Yes	55	55	100	Yes	18	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	31	31	100	Yes	31	31	100	Yes	9	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	19	-	-	-	19	-	-	-	5	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	343	339	99	Yes	343	339	99	Yes	98	96	98	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.