Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Jordan/Jackson Elementary

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Jordan/Jackson Elementary

Organization Information

District:

Mansfield (01670000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

Jordan/Jackson Elementary (01670014)

Grades served:

03,04,05

Region:

Southeast

Title I status:

Non-Title I School (NT)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		89.7	89.6	90.3	0.7	94.0	94.9	71	840	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		73.0	73.6	76.2	2.6	84.3	86.5	52	242	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		81.2	81.2	79.1	-2.1	82.8	90.6	61	127	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	20	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		67.4	64.4	66.7	2.3	81.0	83.7	56	151	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		85.5	93.6	89.9	-3.7	91.5	92.8	37	37	0	Declined
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	21	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		84.7	89.2	89.1	-0.1	91.1	92.4	96	39	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		88.0	86.3	95.5	9.2	93.0	94.0	91	22	100	Above Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		90.6	89.9	90.5	0.6	94.5	95.3	64	720	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		88.5	87.3	89.5	2.2	93.3	94.3	68	839	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		71.7	72.1	76.0	3.9	83.5	85.9	51	242	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		75.4	75.4	79.4	4.0	77.5	87.7	64	126	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	20	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		66.7	66.9	67.1	0.2	80.6	83.4	58	152	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		88.7	92.9	93.2	0.3	93.4	94.4	35	37	75	On Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	21	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		83.3	88.5	86.5	-2.0	90.3	91.7	91	39	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		88.0	83.1	91.3	8.2	93.0	94.0	82	23	50	Improved Below Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		89.1	87.9	89.9	2.0	93.6	94.6	62	718	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		84.5	88.7	81.8	-6.9	91.0	92.3	53	305	0	Declined
High needs		71.0	77.7	68.4	-9.3	83.1	85.5	52	95	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		82.9	82.9	76.6	-6.3	84.3	91.5	83	46	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		66.1	73.6	59.6	-14.0	80.2	83.1	42	60	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		85.1	88.6	81.2	-7.4	91.3	92.6	32	264	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	18.2	14.5	840	0	4.0	3.2	840	25
High needs	3.1	2.9	242	0	13.4	9.5	242	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	2.2	5.5	127	25	6.7	10.2	127	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	20	-	-	-	20	-
Students w/ disabilities	2.4	0.0	151	0	20.8	15.2	151	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	33.3	18.9	37	0	2.6	2.7	37	0
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	21	-	-	-	21	-
Hispanic/Latino	10.8	5.1	39	0	8.1	0.0	39	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	16.1	13.6	22	0	9.7	0.0	22	25
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	18.4	15.0	720	0	3.5	3.2	720	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	35.4	40.2	839	25	5.1	3.9	839	25
High needs	11.8	16.1	242	25	16.0	10.7	242	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	12.6	21.4	126	25	9.6	6.3	126	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	20	-	-	-	20	-
Students w/ disabilities	7.7	5.9	152	0	21.9	17.1	152	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	71.8	67.6	37	0	0.0	0.0	37	25
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	21	-	-	-	21	-
Hispanic/Latino	29.7	43.6	39	25	2.7	5.1	39	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	29.0	26.1	23	0	9.7	4.3	23	25
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	34.9	39.8	718	25	4.7	3.8	718	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	22.5	20.0	305	0	2.0	5.9	305	0
High needs	11.9	6.3	95	0	7.1	15.8	95	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	9.8	8.7	46	0	2.4	6.5	46	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Students w/ disabilities	10.9	3.3	60	0	9.1	23.3	60	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	15	-	-	-	15	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	21.4	19.7	264	0	1.5	6.1	264	0

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		50.0	52.0	2.0	51.0	No	571	75	On Target
High needs		45.0	52.0	7.0	51.0	Yes	163	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		47.0	47.0	0.0	51.0	No	87	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	11	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		40.0	52.0	12.0	51.0	No	100	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		61.0	45.0	-16.0	51.0	No	25	50	Below Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	18	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	27	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	18	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		50.0	52.0	2.0	51.0	No	483	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		44.0	48.0	4.0	51.0	Yes	572	75	On Target
High needs		35.5	46.0	10.5	51.0	Yes	165	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		31.5	51.0	19.5	51.0	Yes	87	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	11	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		35.5	37.0	1.5	51.0	No	103	50	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	25	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	18	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	27	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	19	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		43.0	48.0	5.0	51.0	Yes	483	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	6.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	6.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	6.00	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	860	854	99	Yes	860	853	99	Yes	310	308	99	Yes
High needs	251	248	99	Yes	251	248	99	Yes	99	98	99	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	131	130	99	Yes	131	129	98	Yes	49	48	98	Yes
EL and Former EL	23	-	-	-	23	-	-	-	6	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	156	153	98	Yes	156	154	99	Yes	60	60	100	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	41	41	100	Yes	41	41	100	Yes	9	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	21	-	-	-	21	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	41	41	100	Yes	41	41	100	Yes	16	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	25	23	96	Yes	25	24	96	Yes	13	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	731	727	99	Yes	731	725	99	Yes	268	266	99	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.