Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Lynnfield Middle School

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Lynnfield Middle School

Organization Information

District:

Lynnfield (01640000)

School type:

Middle School

School:

Lynnfield Middle School (01640405)

Grades served:

05,06,07,08

Region:

Northeast

Title I status:

Non-Title I School (NT)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		95.7	95.6	95.2	-0.4	97.5	97.9	82	690	75	On Target
High needs		85.1	86.5	86.2	-0.3	91.3	92.6	82	177	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		96.4	96.4	94.4	-2.0	96.7	98.2	95	49	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		80.8	82.7	82.9	0.2	88.8	90.4	87	140	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	23	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		88.0	94.0	97.1	3.1	92.0	94.0	97	26	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	16	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		95.8	95.6	95.0	-0.6	97.6	97.9	73	612	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		85.7	91.3	91.3	0.0	91.7	92.9	91	690	100	Above Target
High needs		65.4	75.9	73.7	-2.2	79.8	82.7	88	178	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		87.3	87.3	83.7	-3.6	88.4	93.7	95	49	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		58.8	71.1	69.5	-1.6	76.0	79.4	93	141	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	23	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		73.9	81.0	87.5	6.5	82.6	87.0	95	26	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	16	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		86.2	91.8	91.4	-0.4	92.0	93.1	88	612	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		84.2	87.3	88.7	1.4	90.8	92.1	94	324	100	Above Target
High needs		67.2	71.9	73.2	1.3	80.9	83.6	93	70	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	21	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		62.3	68.4	71.4	3.0	78.0	81.2	96	55	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		85.0	87.2	89.5	2.3	91.3	92.5	94	280	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	31.6	26.5	690	0	1.7	0.9	690	25
High needs	7.6	5.1	177	0	5.4	2.8	177	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	17.9	10.2	49	0	0.0	2.0	49	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Students w/ disabilities	3.7	2.1	140	0	7.4	3.6	140	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	23	-	-	-	23	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Hispanic/Latino	12.0	26.9	26	25	8.0	0.0	26	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	16	-	-	-	16	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	31.7	26.0	612	0	1.6	1.0	612	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	40.6	43.8	690	0	4.6	3.9	690	25
High needs	15.1	18.5	178	25	15.6	15.2	178	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	26.3	32.7	49	25	5.3	10.2	49	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Students w/ disabilities	9.6	14.2	141	25	19.9	17.7	141	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	23	-	-	-	23	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Hispanic/Latino	28.0	30.8	26	25	20.0	11.5	26	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	16	-	-	-	16	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	40.5	43.1	612	0	3.9	3.6	612	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	17.5	20.4	324	25	2.2	2.8	324	0
High needs	5.6	8.6	70	25	7.8	11.4	70	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	21	-	-	-	21	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Students w/ disabilities	4.4	7.3	55	25	8.8	12.7	55	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	16.8	18.9	280	25	2.1	2.5	280	0

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		40.0	37.5	-2.5	51.0	No	670	25	Below Target
High needs		37.0	33.5	-3.5	51.0	No	166	25	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		43.0	33.0	-10.0	51.0	No	44	25	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		35.0	30.0	-5.0	51.0	No	133	0	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	23	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	13	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	23	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	16	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		37.0	36.0	-1.0	51.0	No	595	25	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		42.0	42.0	0.0	51.0	No	669	50	Below Target
High needs		35.0	34.0	-1.0	51.0	No	166	25	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		39.5	47.5	8.0	51.0	No	44	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		30.0	27.0	-3.0	51.0	No	132	0	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	23	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	13	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	23	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	16	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		42.0	42.0	0.0	51.0	No	594	50	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	1.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	1.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	1.00	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	697	694	100	Yes	697	695	100	Yes	328	327	100	Yes
High needs	181	179	99	Yes	180	180	100	Yes	71	71	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	49	49	100	Yes	49	49	100	Yes	21	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	4	-	-	-	4	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	144	142	99	Yes	143	143	100	Yes	56	56	100	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	24	-	-	-	25	-	-	-	13	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	13	-	-	-	13	-	-	-	11	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	26	26	100	Yes	26	26	100	Yes	13	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	17	-	-	-	17	-	-	-	8	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	617	614	100	Yes	616	614	100	Yes	283	282	100	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.