Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Lincoln-Thomson
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Lincoln-Thomson
Organization Information
District:Lynn (01630000)School type:Elementary School
School:Lincoln-Thomson (01630070)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Commissioner's DistrictsTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 80.9, Target = 91.5CPI = 80.9, Target = 91.5CPI = 80.9, Target = 91.5 85.4 81.9 80.9 -1.0 91.5 92.7 3013225No Change
High needsCPI = 75.3, Target = 90.4CPI = 75.3, Target = 90.4CPI = 75.3, Target = 90.4 83.6 75.6 75.3 -0.3 90.4 91.8 477625No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 79.3, Target = 81.6CPI = 79.3, Target = 81.6CPI = 79.3, Target = 81.6 79.9 79.9 79.3 -0.6 81.6 90.0 625825No Change
EL and Former EL -------23--
Students w/ disabilities -------19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------16--
Afr. Amer./Black -------9--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 76.6, Target = 90.3CPI = 76.6, Target = 90.3CPI = 76.6, Target = 90.3 83.3 84.3 76.6 -7.7 90.3 91.7 67640Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 87.2, Target = 92.6CPI = 87.2, Target = 92.6CPI = 87.2, Target = 92.6 87.3 79.9 87.2 7.3 92.6 93.7 453750Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 83, Target = 92.7CPI = 83, Target = 92.7CPI = 83, Target = 92.7 87.4 81.9 83.0 1.1 92.7 93.7 3913250Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 79.9, Target = 91.1CPI = 79.9, Target = 91.1CPI = 79.9, Target = 91.1 84.7 77.2 79.9 2.7 91.1 92.4 687650Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 80.6, Target = 82.3CPI = 80.6, Target = 82.3CPI = 80.6, Target = 82.3 80.7 80.7 80.6 -0.1 82.3 90.4 695825No Change
EL and Former EL -------23--
Students w/ disabilities -------19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------16--
Afr. Amer./Black -------9--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 80.1, Target = 90.3CPI = 80.1, Target = 90.3CPI = 80.1, Target = 90.3 83.3 80.9 80.1 -0.8 90.3 91.7 746425No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 88.5, Target = 93.6CPI = 88.5, Target = 93.6CPI = 88.5, Target = 93.6 89.1 84.1 88.5 4.4 93.6 94.6 533750Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 74.4, Target = 91.8CPI = 74.4, Target = 91.8CPI = 74.4, Target = 91.8 85.9 89.8 74.4 -15.4 91.8 93.0 32450Declined
High needs  79.2---- 89.6-27--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------21--
EL and Former EL -------6--
Students w/ disabilities -------6--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------18--
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 6.1 9.813225 8.4 6.813225
High needs 3.8 9.27625 14.1 10.57625
Econ. Disadvantaged 4.5 12.15825 9.1 6.95825
EL and Former EL--23---23-
Students w/ disabilities--19---19-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--16---16-
Afr. Amer./Black--9---9-
Hispanic/Latino 8.5 7.8640 5.1 10.9640
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--6---6-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 4.9 10.83725 17.1 2.73725
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 16.0 21.213225 7.6 3.813225
High needs 12.8 17.17625 11.5 3.97625
Econ. Disadvantaged 15.2 22.45825 10.6 3.45825
EL and Former EL--23---23-
Students w/ disabilities--19---19-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--16---16-
Afr. Amer./Black--9---9-
Hispanic/Latino 13.6 17.26425 10.2 6.36425
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--6---6-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 14.6 29.73725 7.3 0.03725
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 22.7 6.7450 2.3 8.9450
High needs--27---27-
Econ. Disadvantaged--21---21-
EL and Former EL--6---6-
Students w/ disabilities--6---6-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--17---17-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--18---18-
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 51, Target = 51SGP = 51, Target = 51 49.5 51.0 1.5 51.0No8375On Target
High needsSGP = 50.5, Target = 51SGP = 50.5, Target = 51 43.0 50.5 7.5 51.0No4875On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 50.5, Target = 51SGP = 50.5, Target = 51 50.0 50.5 0.5 51.0No4075On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-11--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-14--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51 63.0 49.0 -14.0 51.0No3450Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 57.5, Target = 51SGP = 57.5, Target = 51SGP = 57.5, Target = 51 37.0 57.5 20.5 51.0No26100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 51, Target = 51SGP = 51, Target = 51 57.5 51.0 -6.5 51.0No8375On Target
High needsSGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51 56.0 49.0 -7.0 51.0No4850Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 51, Target = 51SGP = 51, Target = 51 61.0 51.0 -10.0 51.0No4075On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-11--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-14--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 49.5, Target = 51SGP = 49.5, Target = 51SGP = 49.5, Target = 51 67.0 49.5 -17.5 51.0No3450Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 51, Target = 51SGP = 51, Target = 51 54.0 51.0 -3.0 51.0Yes2675On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 62.0 60.03225
High needs 62.0 60.03225
EL and Former EL- 60.032-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students136136100Yes137137100Yes4747100Yes
High needs8080100Yes8181100Yes2929100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged6060100Yes6060100Yes22---
EL and Former EL25---26---7---
Students w/ disabilities20---20---6---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian16---16---5---
Afr. Amer./Black10---10---4---
Hispanic/Latino6767100Yes6868100Yes18---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.6---6---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White3737100Yes3737100Yes18---

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles