Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Brickett Elementary
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Brickett Elementary
Organization Information
District:Lynn (01630000)School type:Elementary School
School:Brickett Elementary (01630020)Grades served:01,02,03,04,05
Region:Commissioner's DistrictsTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 85.2, Target = 88.9CPI = 85.2, Target = 88.9CPI = 85.2, Target = 88.9 80.9 78.3 85.2 6.9 88.9 90.5 4814750Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 82, Target = 87.1CPI = 82, Target = 87.1CPI = 82, Target = 87.1 77.9 73.3 82.0 8.7 87.1 89.0 7810350Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 83.4, Target = 79.4CPI = 83.4, Target = 79.4CPI = 83.4, Target = 79.4 77.5 77.5 83.4 5.9 79.4 88.8 8189100Above Target
EL and Former ELCPI = 75.8, Target = 83.3CPI = 75.8, Target = 83.3CPI = 75.8, Target = 83.3 71.3 62.5 75.8 13.3 83.3 85.7 693150Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities -------17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------22--
Afr. Amer./Black -------14--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 82.9, Target = 87.2CPI = 82.9, Target = 87.2CPI = 82.9, Target = 87.2 78.0 72.2 82.9 10.7 87.2 89.0 867650Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------22--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 81.3, Target = 85.1CPI = 81.3, Target = 85.1CPI = 81.3, Target = 85.1 74.5 80.2 81.3 1.1 85.1 87.3 3114750Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 77.2, Target = 83.6CPI = 77.2, Target = 83.6CPI = 77.2, Target = 83.6 71.8 76.7 77.2 0.5 83.6 85.9 5610350Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 78.1, Target = 80.2CPI = 78.1, Target = 80.2CPI = 78.1, Target = 80.2 78.4 78.4 78.1 -0.3 80.2 89.2 578925No Change
EL and Former ELCPI = 71.8, Target = 86.1CPI = 71.8, Target = 86.1CPI = 71.8, Target = 86.1 76.2 71.1 71.8 0.7 86.1 88.1 443150Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities -------17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------22--
Afr. Amer./Black -------14--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 78.9, Target = 84CPI = 78.9, Target = 84CPI = 78.9, Target = 84 72.5 76.8 78.9 2.1 84.0 86.3 717650Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------22--
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 73.8, Target = 81.2CPI = 73.8, Target = 81.2CPI = 73.8, Target = 81.2 67.7 75.0 73.8 -1.2 81.2 83.9 314325No Change
High needsCPI = 68, Target = 78.1CPI = 68, Target = 78.1CPI = 68, Target = 78.1 62.5 68.9 68.0 -0.9 78.1 81.3 513225No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged  74.0---- 87.0-26--
EL and Former EL -------11--
Students w/ disabilities -------4--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------6--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino  73.8---- 86.9-22--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------7--
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 9.4 6.81470 9.4 4.814725
High needs 4.8 5.810325 12.5 6.810325
Econ. Disadvantaged 4.9 5.68925 8.6 6.78925
EL and Former EL 2.6 3.23125 18.4 12.93125
Students w/ disabilities--17---17-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--22---22-
Afr. Amer./Black--14---14-
Hispanic/Latino 2.8 6.67625 14.1 5.37625
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--12---12-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--22---22-
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 19.4 21.814725 12.5 10.214725
High needs 16.3 17.51030 16.3 14.610325
Econ. Disadvantaged 18.5 19.1890 13.6 15.7890
EL and Former EL 7.9 9.73125 23.7 16.13125
Students w/ disabilities--17---17-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--22---22-
Afr. Amer./Black--14---14-
Hispanic/Latino 14.1 21.17625 15.5 13.27625
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--12---12-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--22---22-
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 9.4 11.64325 9.4 14.0430
High needs 0.0 9.43225 12.1 18.8320
Econ. Disadvantaged--26---26-
EL and Former EL--11---11-
Students w/ disabilities--4---4-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--6---6-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--22---22-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--7---7-
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 51.5, Target = 51SGP = 51.5, Target = 51 42.0 51.5 9.5 51.0Yes9275On Target
High needsSGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51 41.5 59.0 17.5 51.0Yes64100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51 41.0 58.0 17.0 51.0Yes53100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-18--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-10--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-8--
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 57.5, Target = 51SGP = 57.5, Target = 51SGP = 57.5, Target = 51 37.0 57.5 20.5 51.0Yes48100Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-14--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51 43.0 39.0 -4.0 51.0No9225Below Target
High needsSGP = 38.5, Target = 51SGP = 38.5, Target = 51SGP = 38.5, Target = 51 44.0 38.5 -5.5 51.0No6425Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51 44.0 37.0 -7.0 51.0No5325Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-18--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-10--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-8--
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 46.5, Target = 51SGP = 46.5, Target = 51SGP = 46.5, Target = 51 40.0 46.5 6.5 51.0No4850Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-14--
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 75.0 60.04125
High needs 75.0 60.04125
EL and Former EL 75.0 60.04125
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students159159100Yes160160100Yes4949100Yes
High needs112112100Yes113113100Yes3636100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged9595100Yes9696100Yes2929100Yes
EL and Former EL3737100Yes3838100Yes14---
Students w/ disabilities18---18---4---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1---1---
Asian22---22---6---
Afr. Amer./Black16---15---2---
Hispanic/Latino8686100Yes8888100Yes2828100Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.12---12---5---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White22---22---7---

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles