Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Longmeadow High

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Longmeadow High

Organization Information

District:

Longmeadow (01590000)

School type:

High School

School:

Longmeadow High (01590505)

Grades served:

09,10,11,12

Region:

Pioneer Valley

Title I status:

Non-Title I School (NT)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 1

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		98.9	99.8	99.8	0.0	99.4	99.5	94	222	100	Above Target
High needs		95.7	98.9	99.0	0.1	97.5	97.9	92	49	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	16	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		95.6	98.6	99.3	0.7	97.4	97.8	98	36	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	21	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		99.0	99.7	99.9	0.2	99.4	99.5	93	181	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		97.8	96.7	98.4	1.7	98.7	98.9	93	223	100	Above Target
High needs		90.8	86.2	94.1	7.9	94.6	95.4	95	51	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	16	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		87.5	82.6	92.1	9.5	92.7	93.8	94	38	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	21	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		98.2	97.4	98.4	1.0	99.0	99.1	88	183	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		96.3	97.8	97.7	-0.1	97.8	98.2	89	220	100	Above Target
High needs		87.2	90.9	91.0	0.1	92.5	93.6	88	50	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	16	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		86.4	88.3	89.9	1.6	92.1	93.2	91	37	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	20	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		96.7	97.8	97.9	0.1	98.1	98.4	85	181	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	72.4	68.0	222	0	0.0	0.0	222	25
High needs	36.2	32.7	49	0	0.0	0.0	49	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	16	-	-	-	16	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Students w/ disabilities	27.8	25.0	36	0	0.0	0.0	36	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	21	-	-	-	21	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	73.0	68.5	181	0	0.0	0.0	181	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	73.8	83.9	223	25	1.8	0.0	223	25
High needs	36.2	62.7	51	25	8.5	0.0	51	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	16	-	-	-	16	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Students w/ disabilities	22.2	55.3	38	25	11.1	0.0	38	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	21	-	-	-	21	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	74.6	82.5	183	25	1.1	0.0	183	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	50.9	50.5	220	0	0.5	0.0	220	25
High needs	22.0	34.0	50	25	2.4	0.0	50	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	16	-	-	-	16	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Students w/ disabilities	12.5	21.6	37	25	3.1	0.0	37	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	20	-	-	-	20	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	52.4	48.1	181	0	0.5	0.0	181	25

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		55.0	50.0	-5.0	51.0	No	209	50	Below Target
High needs		63.0	43.5	-19.5	51.0	No	44	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	51.0	-	14	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		56.5	42.5	-14.0	51.0	Yes	34	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	18	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	9	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		54.5	50.0	-4.5	51.0	Yes	174	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		57.0	71.0	14.0	51.0	Yes	209	100	Above Target
High needs		41.0	75.0	34.0	51.0	Yes	46	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	51.0	-	14	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		40.0	74.0	34.0	51.0	Yes	36	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	18	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		56.0	70.0	14.0	51.0	Yes	175	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	2.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	2.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	2.00	-

Summary > 2016

2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		98.3	97.6	-0.7	80.0	90.0	249	100	Above Target
High needs		97.1	93.4	-3.7	80.0	90.0	61	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	5	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		98.1	92.1	-6.0	80.0	90.0	38	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	19	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	4	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	14	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
White		98.5	97.1	-1.4	80.0	90.0	206	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2013 Rate	2014 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		98.8	99.1	0.3	85.0	95.0	230	100	Above Target
High needs		98.1	97.1	-1.0	85.0	95.0	68	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		97.4	98.1	0.7	85.0	95.0	53	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	23	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	5	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	2	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
White		98.6	99.5	0.9	85.0	95.0	198	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2015 Annual Dropout Rate About the Data
	0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20	Baseline Rate	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	Dropout Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		0.7	0.0	0.2	-0.2	0.4	0.4	84	967	75	On Target
High needs		2.1	0.0	0.0	0.0	1.2	1.1	91	201	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	53	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		1.4	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.8	0.7	88	153	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	60	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	28	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	34	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	18	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		0.4	0.0	0.1	-0.1	0.2	0.2	83	825	100	Above Target

Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more) About the Data
	2015 Number of Dropouts Reengaged	PPI Points
All students	-	-
High needs	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	226	224	99	Yes	227	226	100	Yes	227	227	100	Yes
High needs	52	50	96	Yes	52	52	100	Yes	52	52	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	16	-	-	-	16	-	-	-	16	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	3	-	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	38	36	95	Yes	38	38	100	Yes	38	38	100	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	21	-	-	-	21	-	-	-	21	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	10	-	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	9	-	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	184	182	99	Yes	185	185	100	Yes	185	185	100	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.