Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Williams Middle
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Williams Middle
Organization Information
District:Longmeadow (01590000)School type:Middle School
School:Williams Middle (01590305)Grades served:06,07,08
Region:Pioneer ValleyTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 96.6, Target = 98CPI = 96.6, Target = 98CPI = 96.6, Target = 98 96.6 96.5 96.6 0.1 98.0 98.3 90378100Above Target
High needsCPI = 88, Target = 92.7CPI = 88, Target = 92.7CPI = 88, Target = 92.7 87.4 86.3 88.0 1.7 92.7 93.7 888350Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged  88.5---- 94.3-28--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 86.6, Target = 91.8CPI = 86.6, Target = 91.8CPI = 86.6, Target = 91.8 86.0 84.1 86.6 2.5 91.8 93.0 916775On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
AsianCPI = 96.7, Target = 96.2CPI = 96.7, Target = 96.2 93.5 97.4 96.7 -0.7 96.2 96.8 5730100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 96.3, Target = 98.4CPI = 96.3, Target = 98.4CPI = 96.3, Target = 98.4 97.3 96.3 96.3 0.0 98.4 98.7 8431775On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90.1, Target = 92CPI = 90.1, Target = 92CPI = 90.1, Target = 92 86.3 91.4 90.1 -1.3 92.0 93.2 8837975On Target
High needsCPI = 71.6, Target = 80.5CPI = 71.6, Target = 80.5CPI = 71.6, Target = 80.5 66.5 70.9 71.6 0.7 80.5 83.3 858250Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged  83.3---- 91.7-28--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 67.4, Target = 78.8CPI = 67.4, Target = 78.8CPI = 67.4, Target = 78.8 63.7 64.3 67.4 3.1 78.8 81.9 916675On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
AsianCPI = 93.3, Target = 96.2CPI = 93.3, Target = 96.2CPI = 93.3, Target = 96.2 93.5 94.8 93.3 -1.5 96.2 96.8 5030100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 90.1, Target = 92.3CPI = 90.1, Target = 92.3CPI = 90.1, Target = 92.3 86.8 91.0 90.1 -0.9 92.3 93.4 8531875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 86.6, Target = 90.7CPI = 86.6, Target = 90.7CPI = 86.6, Target = 90.7 84.0 90.0 86.6 -3.4 90.7 92.0 90138100Above Target
High needsCPI = 69.2, Target = 81.5CPI = 69.2, Target = 81.5CPI = 69.2, Target = 81.5 68.3 73.1 69.2 -3.9 81.5 84.2 85260Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------9--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------15--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 85.3, Target = 90CPI = 85.3, Target = 90CPI = 85.3, Target = 90 82.8 90.7 85.3 -5.4 90.0 91.4 8211475On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 31.3 27.23780 0.8 1.13780
High needs 12.5 6.0830 3.8 2.48325
Econ. Disadvantaged--28---28-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities 3.2 3.0670 3.2 1.56725
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian 48.3 50.0300 0.0 0.03025
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--14---14-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--12---12-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 29.7 25.63170 0.9 1.33170
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 41.6 41.23790 4.2 4.03790
High needs 11.3 9.8820 17.5 17.1820
Econ. Disadvantaged--28---28-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities 1.6 6.16625 20.6 19.7660
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian 75.9 73.3300 0.0 3.3300
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--14---14-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--12---12-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 40.5 39.03180 4.6 3.831825
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 8.9 15.913825 3.0 5.81380
High needs 0.0 3.82625 14.8 23.1260
Econ. Disadvantaged--9---9-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--19---19-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--15---15-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 9.5 14.011425 2.6 7.01140
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51 65.0 61.0 -4.0 51.0No362100Above Target
High needsSGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51 55.0 58.0 3.0 51.0Yes8175On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-26--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51 46.5 55.0 8.5 51.0Yes6775On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
AsianSGP = 74, Target = 51SGP = 74, Target = 51SGP = 74, Target = 51 75.0 74.0 -1.0 51.0No30100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51 61.5 58.0 -3.5 51.0No30575On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 50, Target = 51SGP = 50, Target = 51 57.5 50.0 -7.5 51.0No36450Below Target
High needsSGP = 52.5, Target = 51SGP = 52.5, Target = 51SGP = 52.5, Target = 51 55.0 52.5 -2.5 51.0No8075On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-26--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 56.5, Target = 51SGP = 56.5, Target = 51SGP = 56.5, Target = 51 51.0 56.5 5.5 51.0Yes6675On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
AsianSGP = 41.5, Target = 51SGP = 41.5, Target = 51SGP = 41.5, Target = 51 68.0 41.5 -26.5 51.0No3050Below Target
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 50, Target = 51SGP = 50, Target = 51 57.0 50.0 -7.0 51.0No30750Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students38438299Yes384383100Yes14013899Yes
High needs8383100Yes838299Yes272696Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged2828100Yes2828100Yes9---
EL and Former EL------------
Students w/ disabilities6767100Yes676699Yes20---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1-------
Asian3030100Yes3030100Yes15---
Afr. Amer./Black4---4---2---
Hispanic/Latino14---14---3---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.12---12---4---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White32332199Yes323322100Yes11611498Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles