Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Blueberry Hill
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Blueberry Hill
Organization Information
District:Longmeadow (01590000)School type:Elementary School
School:Blueberry Hill (01590005)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Pioneer ValleyTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 92.7, Target = 94.8CPI = 92.7, Target = 94.8CPI = 92.7, Target = 94.8 91.1 92.9 92.7 -0.2 94.8 95.6 8321575On Target
High needsCPI = 81.1, Target = 86.6CPI = 81.1, Target = 86.6CPI = 81.1, Target = 86.6 77.0 82.7 81.1 -1.6 86.6 88.5 756125No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged -------12--
EL and Former EL -------9--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 76.6, Target = 83.6CPI = 76.6, Target = 83.6CPI = 76.6, Target = 83.6 71.9 80.8 76.6 -4.2 83.6 86.0 82460Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
AsianCPI = 97.1, Target = 97.8CPI = 97.1, Target = 97.8 96.2 90.6 97.1 6.5 97.8 98.1 8435100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 92.9, Target = 94.5CPI = 92.9, Target = 94.5CPI = 92.9, Target = 94.5 90.5 93.8 92.9 -0.9 94.5 95.3 7816375On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 94.1, Target = 93.4CPI = 94.1, Target = 93.4 88.7 90.6 94.1 3.5 93.4 94.4 90215100Above Target
High needsCPI = 84.8, Target = 87.3CPI = 84.8, Target = 87.3CPI = 84.8, Target = 87.3 78.2 77.8 84.8 7.0 87.3 89.1 866150Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------12--
EL and Former EL -------9--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 82.1, Target = 84.5CPI = 82.1, Target = 84.5CPI = 82.1, Target = 84.5 73.5 73.2 82.1 8.9 84.5 86.8 924675On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
AsianCPI = 99.3, Target = 98.9CPI = 99.3, Target = 98.9 98.1 91.4 99.3 7.9 98.9 99.1 9135100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 93.9, Target = 92.9CPI = 93.9, Target = 92.9 87.8 91.2 93.9 2.7 92.9 93.9 8416375On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 87.7, Target = 97.2CPI = 87.7, Target = 97.2CPI = 87.7, Target = 97.2 95.2 83.7 87.7 4.0 97.2 97.6 747950Improved Below Target
High needs  70.8---- 85.4-23--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------3--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------10--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 86.7, Target = 97CPI = 86.7, Target = 97CPI = 86.7, Target = 97 94.9 84.2 86.7 2.5 97.0 97.5 586450Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 15.2 29.821525 1.5 2.82150
High needs 4.9 9.86125 4.9 9.8610
Econ. Disadvantaged--12---12-
EL and Former EL--9---9-
Students w/ disabilities 3.6 2.2460 3.6 13.0460
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian 18.8 51.43525 6.3 0.03525
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 15.7 25.216325 0.5 1.81630
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 39.8 48.821525 3.4 0.021525
High needs 18.5 23.06125 11.1 0.06125
Econ. Disadvantaged--12---12-
EL and Former EL--9---9-
Students w/ disabilities 14.3 15.2460 14.3 0.04625
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian 53.1 65.73525 6.3 0.03525
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 39.0 47.216325 2.9 0.016325
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 19.1 24.17925 3.4 2.57925
High needs--23---23-
Econ. Disadvantaged--3---3-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--20---20-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--10---10-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--4---4-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 18.4 21.96425 1.3 3.1640
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 69, Target = 51SGP = 69, Target = 51SGP = 69, Target = 51 54.0 69.0 15.0 51.0No143100Above Target
High needsSGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51 52.0 39.0 -13.0 51.0No4325Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-7--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-8--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51 52.0 38.0 -14.0 51.0No3325Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-22--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51 54.0 64.0 10.0 51.0No109100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 77, Target = 51SGP = 77, Target = 51SGP = 77, Target = 51 66.5 77.0 10.5 51.0Yes143100Above Target
High needsSGP = 67, Target = 51SGP = 67, Target = 51SGP = 67, Target = 51 64.5 67.0 2.5 51.0Yes43100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-7--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-8--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51 64.0 61.0 -3.0 51.0Yes33100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-22--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 75, Target = 51SGP = 75, Target = 51SGP = 75, Target = 51 69.0 75.0 6.0 51.0Yes109100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.04-
High needs- 60.04-
EL and Former EL- 60.04-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students219219100Yes221221100Yes8383100Yes
High needs6363100Yes6363100Yes2424100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged13---13---4---
EL and Former EL11---11---3---
Students w/ disabilities4646100Yes4646100Yes2020100Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian3737100Yes3939100Yes13---
Afr. Amer./Black3---3-------
Hispanic/Latino6---6---4---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.7---7---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.1---1-------
White165165100Yes165165100Yes6565100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles