Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Russell St Elementary

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Russell St Elementary

Organization Information
District:Littleton (01580000)School type:Elementary School
School:Russell St Elementary (01580015)Grades served:03,04,05
Region:CentralTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 88.8, Target = 93.8CPI = 88.8, Target = 93.8CPI = 88.8, Target = 93.8 89.4 89.3 88.8 -0.5 93.8 94.7 6536025No Change
High needsCPI = 72, Target = 82.3CPI = 72, Target = 82.3CPI = 72, Target = 82.3 69.7 73.3 72.0 -1.3 82.3 84.9 3210725No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 74.3, Target = 82.9CPI = 74.3, Target = 82.9CPI = 74.3, Target = 82.9 81.3 81.3 74.3 -7.0 82.9 90.7 38350Declined
EL and Former EL -------8--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 67.4, Target = 81.3CPI = 67.4, Target = 81.3CPI = 67.4, Target = 81.3 68.0 66.8 67.4 0.6 81.3 84.0 598650Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------16--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 89, Target = 93.7CPI = 89, Target = 93.7CPI = 89, Target = 93.7 89.2 89.7 89.0 -0.7 93.7 94.6 5531625No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90, Target = 94.6CPI = 90, Target = 94.6CPI = 90, Target = 94.6 90.7 90.7 90.0 -0.7 94.6 95.4 7036125No Change
High needsCPI = 75.7, Target = 86.8CPI = 75.7, Target = 86.8CPI = 75.7, Target = 86.8 77.3 76.5 75.7 -0.8 86.8 88.7 4910625No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 71.4, Target = 83.6CPI = 71.4, Target = 83.6CPI = 71.4, Target = 83.6 82.1 82.1 71.4 -10.7 83.6 91.1 30350Declined
EL and Former EL -------8--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 73.2, Target = 85.9CPI = 73.2, Target = 85.9CPI = 73.2, Target = 85.9 75.8 72.4 73.2 0.8 85.9 87.9 738550Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------16--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 91.1, Target = 94.6CPI = 91.1, Target = 94.6CPI = 91.1, Target = 94.6 90.8 91.3 91.1 -0.2 94.6 95.4 7031725No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 84.5, Target = 94.9CPI = 84.5, Target = 94.9CPI = 84.5, Target = 94.9 91.3 92.0 84.5 -7.5 94.9 95.7 621240Declined
High needsCPI = 62.2, Target = 84.8CPI = 62.2, Target = 84.8CPI = 62.2, Target = 84.8 74.0 83.3 62.2 -21.1 84.8 87.0 33390Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------12--
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 60.2, Target = 84.8CPI = 60.2, Target = 84.8CPI = 60.2, Target = 84.8 74.0- 60.2 -7.5 84.8 87.0 45320Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 84.6, Target = 95.6CPI = 84.6, Target = 95.6CPI = 84.6, Target = 95.6 92.5 91.8 84.6 -7.2 95.6 96.3 491120Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 15.6 10.63600 5.5 4.736025
High needs 4.9 0.91070 18.6 15.010725
Econ. Disadvantaged 12.5 2.9350 10.0 8.63525
EL and Former EL--8---8-
Students w/ disabilities 1.3 0.0860 24.1 18.68625
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--16---16-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--11---11-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--12---12-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 15.4 10.43160 5.1 4.431625
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 39.1 39.33610 4.3 5.33610
High needs 18.8 13.21060 13.9 16.01060
Econ. Disadvantaged 23.1 14.3350 12.8 17.1350
EL and Former EL--8---8-
Students w/ disabilities 11.5 9.4850 15.4 17.6850
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--16---16-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--11---11-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--12---12-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 40.2 40.43170 3.5 4.13170
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 22.3 21.01240 1.0 4.01240
High needs 18.2 2.6390 3.0 12.8390
Econ. Disadvantaged--12---12-
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities 3.2 0.0320 22.6 12.53225
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--1---1-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 21.7 22.31120 1.1 4.51120
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51 45.0 40.0 -5.0 51.0No24125Below Target
High needsSGP = 31.5, Target = 51SGP = 31.5, Target = 51SGP = 31.5, Target = 51 38.0 31.5 -6.5 51.0No7025Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-25--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-2--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 31, Target = 51SGP = 31, Target = 51SGP = 31, Target = 51 28.5 31.0 2.5 51.0No6050Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-9--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51 46.0 41.0 -5.0 51.0No21550Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 64.5, Target = 51SGP = 64.5, Target = 51SGP = 64.5, Target = 51 58.0 64.5 6.5 51.0No242100Above Target
High needsSGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51 50.0 54.0 4.0 51.0No6975On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-24--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-2--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51 46.0 54.0 8.0 51.0No5975On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-9--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51 57.5 64.0 6.5 51.0No215100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.04-
High needs- 60.04-
EL and Former EL- 60.04-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students37136999Yes37136999Yes12712699Yes
High needs112112100Yes11211098Yes414098Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged3636100Yes3636100Yes13---
EL and Former EL12---12---3---
Students w/ disabilities8787100Yes878699Yes333297Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1---1---
Asian20---20---5---
Afr. Amer./Black5---5-------
Hispanic/Latino11---11---1---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.12---12---4---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.2---2---1---
White32031899Yes320319100Yes11511499Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles