Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Hanscom School
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Hanscom Middle
Organization Information
District:Lincoln (01570000)School type:Elementary-Middle School
School:Hanscom Middle (01570305)Grades served:04,05,06,07,08
Region:Greater BostonTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 89.7, Target = 93CPI = 89.7, Target = 93CPI = 89.7, Target = 93 88.0 88.6 89.7 1.1 93.0 94.0 7322150Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 71.6, Target = 86.9CPI = 71.6, Target = 86.9CPI = 71.6, Target = 86.9 77.5 62.5 71.6 9.1 86.9 88.8 335150Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------8--
EL and Former EL -------8--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 68.3, Target = 78.4CPI = 68.3, Target = 78.4CPI = 68.3, Target = 78.4 62.9 58.1 68.3 10.2 78.4 81.5 674150Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------7--
Afr. Amer./Black -------22--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 84.6, Target = 93.3CPI = 84.6, Target = 93.3CPI = 84.6, Target = 93.3 88.5 87.8 84.6 -3.2 93.3 94.3 77390Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.  92.0---- 96.0-26--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------3--
WhiteCPI = 92.7, Target = 94.3CPI = 92.7, Target = 94.3CPI = 92.7, Target = 94.3 90.2 88.7 92.7 4.0 94.3 95.1 7112475On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 78.4, Target = 85.5CPI = 78.4, Target = 85.5CPI = 78.4, Target = 85.5 75.2 77.6 78.4 0.8 85.5 87.6 5922050Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 59.7, Target = 76.8CPI = 59.7, Target = 76.8CPI = 59.7, Target = 76.8 60.3 58.8 59.7 0.9 76.8 80.2 234950Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------7--
EL and Former EL -------7--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 55.5, Target = 70.3CPI = 55.5, Target = 70.3CPI = 55.5, Target = 70.3 49.1 55.6 55.5 -0.1 70.3 74.6 554125No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------7--
Afr. Amer./Black -------22--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 71.8, Target = 86CPI = 71.8, Target = 86CPI = 71.8, Target = 86 76.0 75.0 71.8 -3.2 86.0 88.0 56390Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.  78.8---- 89.4-26--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------3--
WhiteCPI = 81.5, Target = 87.9CPI = 81.5, Target = 87.9CPI = 81.5, Target = 87.9 79.2 80.2 81.5 1.3 87.9 89.6 4412350Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 80.9, Target = 86.8CPI = 80.9, Target = 86.8CPI = 80.9, Target = 86.8 77.3 81.0 80.9 -0.1 86.8 88.7 759425No Change
High needs -------15--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------1--
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilities -------11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------9--
Hispanic/Latino -------15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------2--
WhiteCPI = 86.3, Target = 89.4CPI = 86.3, Target = 89.4CPI = 86.3, Target = 89.4 81.9 81.4 86.3 4.9 89.4 91.0 735375On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 19.9 24.022125 7.6 4.122125
High needs 0.0 2.05125 35.0 11.85125
Econ. Disadvantaged--8---8-
EL and Former EL--8---8-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0410 41.9 12.24125
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--7---7-
Afr. Amer./Black--22---22-
Hispanic/Latino 10.3 10.3390 2.6 7.7390
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--26---26-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--3---3-
White 24.4 25.81240 10.1 2.412425
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 20.7 19.12200 10.3 10.02200
High needs 2.5 4.14925 32.5 26.54925
Econ. Disadvantaged--7---7-
EL and Former EL--7---7-
Students w/ disabilities 3.2 2.4410 38.7 31.74125
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--7---7-
Afr. Amer./Black--22---22-
Hispanic/Latino 15.8 12.8390 10.5 10.3390
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--26---26-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--3---3-
White 25.0 21.11230 6.9 8.11230
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 9.6 13.89425 8.4 4.39425
High needs--15---15-
Econ. Disadvantaged--1---1-
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities--11---11-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--9---9-
Hispanic/Latino--15---15-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--11---11-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--2---2-
White 12.7 17.05325 9.1 0.05325
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 66.5, Target = 51SGP = 66.5, Target = 51SGP = 66.5, Target = 51 51.0 66.5 15.5 51.0No152100Above Target
High needsSGP = 66, Target = 51SGP = 66, Target = 51SGP = 66, Target = 51 55.5 66.0 10.5 51.0No38100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-3--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-7--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-31--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-5--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-16--
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51 55.0 57.0 2.0 51.0Yes3175On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-17--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-3--
WhiteSGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51 53.0 64.0 11.0 51.0No80100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51 43.0 58.0 15.0 51.0No153100Above Target
High needsSGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51 43.0 57.0 14.0 51.0No3975On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-5--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-6--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-32--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-5--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-16--
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 52, Target = 51SGP = 52, Target = 51 45.0 52.0 7.0 51.0No3375On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-17--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-3--
WhiteSGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51 44.0 62.0 18.0 51.0No79100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.02-
High needs- 60.02-
EL and Former EL- 60.02-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students233232100Yes237236100Yes999899Yes
High needs5353100Yes535298Yes16---
Econ. Disadvantaged8---8---2---
EL and Former EL10---9---3---
Students w/ disabilities4141100Yes4242100Yes11---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian7---7---4---
Afr. Amer./Black23---23---9---
Hispanic/Latino464598Yes4545100Yes16---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.2727100Yes2727100Yes11---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.3---3---2---
White127127100Yes13113099Yes565598Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles