Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Center For Technical Education Innovation

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Center For Technical Education Innovation

Organization Information

District:

Leominster (01530000)

School type:

High School

School:

Center For Technical Education Innovation (01530605)

Grades served:

09,10,11,12

Region:

Central

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		92.9	96.2	96.8	0.6	95.9	96.5	32	149	75	On Target
High needs		87.7	92.1	93.7	1.6	92.8	93.9	43	75	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		92.7	92.7	92.9	0.2	93.3	96.4	22	60	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		74.0	84.3	85.2	0.9	84.8	87.0	24	32	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		85.7	94.5	92.1	-2.4	91.7	92.9	49	41	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		94.5	97.7	98.2	0.5	96.8	97.3	34	83	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		94.0	92.1	88.3	-3.8	96.5	97.0	31	147	0	Declined
High needs		89.9	84.8	80.1	-4.7	94.1	95.0	38	73	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		85.4	85.4	80.2	-5.2	86.6	92.7	28	58	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		88.5	69.8	60.5	-9.3	93.3	94.3	20	31	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		92.9	86.6	76.9	-9.7	95.9	96.5	45	40	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		94.2	95.1	93.0	-2.1	96.6	97.1	43	82	25	No Change

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		91.0	91.5	90.4	-1.1	94.8	95.5	40	148	25	No Change
High needs		86.9	86.1	84.0	-2.1	92.4	93.5	51	72	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		88.1	88.1	84.5	-3.6	89.1	94.1	49	58	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		77.4	-	-	-	-	88.7	-	31	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		86.5	88.8	81.7	-7.1	92.1	93.3	66	41	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		92.4	93.1	94.3	1.2	95.6	96.2	53	84	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	16.7	21.5	149	25	0.8	2.0	149	0
High needs	13.3	9.3	75	0	1.7	4.0	75	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	16.7	11.7	60	0	2.1	5.0	60	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	32	0	3.7	9.4	32	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Hispanic/Latino	7.3	17.1	41	25	0.0	2.4	41	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	21.3	22.9	83	0	0.0	2.4	83	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	44.4	43.5	147	0	6.0	6.1	147	0
High needs	31.1	26.0	73	0	11.5	12.3	73	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	33.3	32.8	58	0	12.5	13.8	58	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Students w/ disabilities	13.8	3.2	31	0	24.1	29.0	31	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Hispanic/Latino	29.3	30.0	40	0	12.2	17.5	40	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	51.3	51.2	82	0	2.6	2.4	82	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	26.8	25.0	148	0	0.8	2.7	148	0
High needs	20.4	11.1	72	0	1.9	5.6	72	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	22.7	12.1	58	0	0.0	6.9	58	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	31	-	-	-	31	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Hispanic/Latino	13.2	19.5	41	25	0.0	7.3	41	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	34.7	31.0	84	0	1.4	1.2	84	25

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		26.0	37.0	11.0	51.0	Yes	143	75	On Target
High needs		27.5	35.0	7.5	51.0	Yes	71	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		26.5	35.0	8.5	51.0	Yes	57	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	29	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	13	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	7	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		27.0	34.0	7.0	51.0	No	39	50	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		23.5	34.5	11.0	51.0	Yes	80	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		46.0	40.0	-6.0	51.0	No	142	25	Below Target
High needs		58.0	40.0	-18.0	51.0	No	69	25	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		54.0	35.0	-19.0	51.0	No	55	25	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	28	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	13	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		55.5	51.5	-4.0	51.0	No	38	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		42.5	32.0	-10.5	51.0	No	79	25	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	3.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	3.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	3.00	-

Summary > 2016

2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		88.4	100.0	11.6	80.0	90.0	106	100	Above Target
High needs		81.2	100.0	18.8	80.0	90.0	64	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	20	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	8	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	20	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
White		90.3	100.0	9.7	80.0	90.0	73	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2013 Rate	2014 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		93.3	88.4	-4.9	85.0	95.0	112	75	On Target
High needs		91.0	81.2	-9.8	85.0	95.0	69	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	9	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	30	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	4	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		96.0	82.8	-13.2	85.0	95.0	29	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
White		92.9	90.3	-2.6	85.0	95.0	72	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2015 Annual Dropout Rate About the Data
	0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20	Baseline Rate	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	Dropout Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		0.4	0.2	0.1	0.1	0.2	0.2	88	751	100	Above Target
High needs		0.6	0.3	0.0	0.3	0.4	0.3	91	380	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		0.0	-	-	-	-	0.0	-	242	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	88	201	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	34	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	52	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		1.2	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.7	0.6	85	213	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	18	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White		0.2	0.3	0.2	0.1	0.1	0.1	79	432	75	On Target

Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more) About the Data
	2015 Number of Dropouts Reengaged	PPI Points
All students	-	-
High needs	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	162	160	99	Yes	161	158	98	Yes	162	162	100	Yes
High needs	85	85	100	Yes	85	83	98	Yes	85	85	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	64	64	100	Yes	64	62	97	Yes	64	64	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	8	-	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	42	42	100	Yes	42	41	98	Yes	42	42	100	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	14	-	-	-	14	-	-	-	14	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	8	-	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	44	44	100	Yes	44	43	98	Yes	44	44	100	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	4	-	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
White	91	89	98	Yes	90	88	98	Yes	91	91	100	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.