Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Northwest

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Northwest

Organization Information

District:

Leominster (01530000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

Northwest (01530030)

Grades served:

K,01,02,03,04,05

Region:

Central

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		79.2	82.5	83.1	0.6	87.9	89.6	38	319	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		70.6	72.5	76.1	3.6	82.9	85.3	52	183	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		76.7	76.7	78.8	2.1	78.6	88.4	59	140	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		53.3	73.6	69.6	-4.0	72.8	76.7	46	37	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities		52.5	50.6	62.7	12.1	72.3	76.3	45	69	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	21	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		69.7	80.0	76.0	-4.0	82.3	84.9	64	104	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		82.7	84.9	87.9	3.0	89.9	91.4	49	177	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		81.2	81.2	85.3	4.1	89.0	90.6	49	319	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		73.5	71.9	78.7	6.8	84.5	86.8	62	183	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		74.0	74.0	80.9	6.9	76.2	87.0	70	141	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		64.2	67.9	73.7	5.8	79.1	82.1	48	38	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		56.0	52.8	61.0	8.2	74.3	78.0	39	68	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	21	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		71.2	76.0	76.7	0.7	83.2	85.6	64	105	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		84.9	86.3	90.2	3.9	91.2	92.5	63	176	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		68.4	64.6	71.3	6.7	81.6	84.2	26	100	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		61.4	55.9	61.1	5.2	77.5	80.7	29	52	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		56.5	56.5	64.3	7.8	60.1	78.3	47	35	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		50.7	40.8	55.8	15.0	71.2	75.4	32	26	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		55.3	56.4	61.7	5.3	73.9	77.7	55	30	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		73.6	70.9	77.0	6.1	84.6	86.8	20	63	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	10.9	10.0	319	0	10.0	6.9	319	25
High needs	5.7	4.4	183	0	18.1	12.0	183	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	6.6	5.0	140	0	13.9	10.0	140	25
EL and Former EL	5.7	2.7	37	0	11.4	10.8	37	0
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	2.9	69	25	41.8	26.1	69	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	21	-	-	-	21	-
Hispanic/Latino	4.0	7.7	104	25	11.9	10.6	104	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	14.1	13.0	177	0	7.8	5.1	177	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	26.4	29.5	319	25	11.5	9.1	319	25
High needs	16.1	18.6	183	25	19.2	14.2	183	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	19.9	22.0	141	25	18.5	12.1	141	25
EL and Former EL	5.7	10.5	38	25	17.1	18.4	38	0
Students w/ disabilities	2.5	7.4	68	25	38.0	35.3	68	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	21	-	-	-	21	-
Hispanic/Latino	11.9	21.0	105	25	12.9	14.3	105	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	36.1	35.2	176	0	6.8	6.3	176	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	4.4	4.0	100	0	22.2	15.0	100	25
High needs	2.5	1.9	52	0	33.3	25.0	52	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	3.2	0.0	35	0	30.6	20.0	35	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	3.8	26	25	63.3	34.6	26	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Hispanic/Latino	0.0	0.0	30	0	28.2	20.0	30	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	6.8	6.3	63	0	13.5	11.1	63	25

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		59.0	42.0	-17.0	51.0	No	209	50	Below Target
High needs		50.5	40.0	-10.5	51.0	No	113	25	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		52.0	35.5	-16.5	51.0	No	80	25	Below Target
EL and Former EL		59.0	46.5	-12.5	51.0	No	24	50	Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		37.0	49.0	12.0	51.0	Yes	49	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	12	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		59.0	49.0	-10.0	51.0	No	65	50	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		61.0	41.0	-20.0	51.0	No	121	50	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		53.0	39.0	-14.0	51.0	Yes	208	75	On Target
High needs		51.5	39.0	-12.5	51.0	Yes	113	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		55.5	40.0	-15.5	51.0	Yes	81	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		62.0	38.0	-24.0	51.0	Yes	25	75	On Target
Students w/ disabilities		40.5	38.5	-2.0	51.0	Yes	48	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	11	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		52.5	34.5	-18.0	51.0	No	66	25	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		54.5	39.5	-15.0	51.0	Yes	120	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	63.0	60.0	46.00	25
High needs	63.0	60.0	46.00	25
EL and Former EL	63.0	60.0	46.00	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	352	347	99	Yes	353	348	99	Yes	107	106	99	Yes
High needs	209	204	98	Yes	210	205	98	Yes	58	57	98	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	163	158	97	Yes	164	160	98	Yes	41	40	98	Yes
EL and Former EL	44	43	98	Yes	45	45	100	Yes	15	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	82	81	99	Yes	83	81	98	Yes	30	30	100	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	9	-	-	-	9	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	27	-	-	-	27	-	-	-	5	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	119	118	99	Yes	120	120	100	Yes	34	34	100	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	10	-	-	-	10	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	186	184	99	Yes	186	183	98	Yes	64	64	100	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.