Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Johnny Appleseed

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Johnny Appleseed

Organization Information

District:

Leominster (01530000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

Johnny Appleseed (01530025)

Grades served:

K,01,02,03,04,05

Region:

Central

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 1

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		79.4	87.3	89.4	2.1	88.0	89.7	67	322	100	Above Target
High needs		71.2	79.8	84.6	4.8	83.2	85.6	86	182	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		81.2	81.2	86.7	5.5	82.8	90.6	91	118	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		67.6	76.7	85.6	8.9	81.1	83.8	90	47	100	Above Target
Students w/ disabilities		61.5	71.3	75.6	4.3	77.5	80.8	79	85	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		74.1	81.7	89.9	8.2	84.9	87.1	95	47	100	Above Target
Hispanic/Latino		66.4	82.2	84.5	2.3	80.4	83.2	89	82	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		83.3	90.9	91.2	0.3	90.3	91.7	68	173	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		78.0	85.5	90.7	5.2	87.2	89.0	75	321	100	Above Target
High needs		71.0	76.8	86.3	9.5	83.1	85.5	89	182	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		77.1	77.1	86.4	9.3	79.0	88.6	89	118	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		62.2	72.2	87.8	15.6	78.0	81.1	86	47	100	Above Target
Students w/ disabilities		66.1	69.4	80.0	10.6	80.2	83.1	88	85	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		65.7	81.1	92.6	11.5	80.0	82.9	99	47	100	Above Target
Hispanic/Latino		64.2	76.8	84.8	8.0	79.1	82.1	86	82	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		83.4	90.7	92.7	2.0	90.3	91.7	79	172	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		76.6	81.5	81.5	0.0	86.4	88.3	52	111	25	No Change
High needs		68.9	73.8	73.8	0.0	81.9	84.5	71	62	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		75.0	75.0	75.8	0.8	77.1	87.5	81	33	50	Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	16	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		66.2	67.5	69.4	1.9	80.3	83.1	74	31	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		62.0	74.3	77.7	3.4	77.8	81.0	91	28	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		82.8	87.2	84.0	-3.2	90.0	91.4	45	61	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	12.6	15.2	322	25	4.6	3.7	322	25
High needs	4.1	5.5	182	25	7.7	5.5	182	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	5.4	6.8	118	25	7.7	5.1	118	25
EL and Former EL	4.5	2.1	47	0	6.8	4.3	47	25
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	3.5	85	25	13.7	9.4	85	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Afr. Amer./Black	11.1	6.4	47	0	8.9	0.0	47	25
Hispanic/Latino	7.2	6.1	82	0	6.2	6.1	82	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	15.9	19.7	173	25	3.2	3.5	173	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	26.3	38.9	321	25	5.7	1.9	321	25
High needs	13.3	21.4	182	25	9.2	3.3	182	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	14.6	22.0	118	25	8.5	3.4	118	25
EL and Former EL	6.8	19.1	47	25	15.9	0.0	47	25
Students w/ disabilities	5.9	10.6	85	25	15.7	5.9	85	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Afr. Amer./Black	8.9	21.3	47	25	2.2	0.0	47	25
Hispanic/Latino	13.4	19.5	82	25	14.4	3.7	82	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	36.0	51.2	172	25	2.6	1.7	172	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	11.9	11.7	111	0	7.1	6.3	111	25
High needs	3.2	1.6	62	0	12.9	11.3	62	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	2.1	3.0	33	25	12.5	9.1	33	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	16	-	-	-	16	-
Students w/ disabilities	3.3	0.0	31	0	20.0	16.1	31	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	15	-	-	-	15	-
Hispanic/Latino	2.6	0.0	28	0	15.8	7.1	28	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	18.1	16.4	61	0	1.4	4.9	61	0

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		61.0	40.0	-21.0	51.0	Yes	200	75	On Target
High needs		60.0	43.0	-17.0	51.0	Yes	108	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		60.0	50.0	-10.0	51.0	Yes	68	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		63.0	53.0	-10.0	51.0	Yes	25	75	On Target
Students w/ disabilities		60.5	38.0	-22.5	51.0	No	50	25	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	7	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		47.5	40.0	-7.5	51.0	Yes	28	75	On Target
Hispanic/Latino		63.5	40.5	-23.0	51.0	Yes	54	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		61.0	37.0	-24.0	51.0	No	106	25	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		51.0	56.0	5.0	51.0	Yes	196	75	On Target
High needs		46.0	54.0	8.0	51.0	Yes	105	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		41.0	55.0	14.0	51.0	Yes	66	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		38.5	64.5	26.0	51.0	Yes	24	100	Above Target
Students w/ disabilities		52.0	51.0	-1.0	51.0	Yes	48	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	7	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		42.5	50.0	7.5	51.0	Yes	27	75	On Target
Hispanic/Latino		42.0	59.0	17.0	51.0	Yes	53	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		57.0	55.0	-2.0	51.0	Yes	104	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	82.0	60.0	49.00	25
High needs	82.0	60.0	49.00	25
EL and Former EL	82.0	60.0	49.00	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	338	338	100	Yes	338	337	100	Yes	119	119	100	Yes
High needs	196	196	100	Yes	196	196	100	Yes	69	69	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	130	130	100	Yes	130	130	100	Yes	38	38	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	51	51	100	Yes	51	51	100	Yes	17	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	88	88	100	Yes	88	88	100	Yes	33	33	100	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	17	-	-	-	17	-	-	-	7	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	49	49	100	Yes	49	49	100	Yes	16	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	89	89	100	Yes	89	89	100	Yes	32	32	100	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	9	-	-	-	9	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	174	174	100	Yes	174	173	99	Yes	62	62	100	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.