Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Frances Drake School

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Frances Drake School

Organization Information

District:

Leominster (01530000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

Frances Drake School (01530010)

Grades served:

K,01,02,03,04,05

Region:

Central

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		82.5	79.5	83.4	3.9	89.8	91.3	39	280	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		71.2	71.6	74.7	3.1	83.2	85.6	44	155	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		71.8	71.8	75.8	4.0	74.2	85.9	46	126	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		60.8	64.0	68.1	4.1	77.1	80.4	41	29	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		52.7	57.7	60.6	2.9	72.4	76.4	38	59	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	19	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		71.4	68.3	74.8	6.5	83.3	85.7	59	108	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		89.2	85.0	89.1	4.1	93.7	94.6	56	131	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		84.8	79.3	83.9	4.6	91.1	92.4	43	279	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		74.2	72.5	76.5	4.0	85.0	87.1	53	154	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		71.7	71.7	76.6	4.9	74.1	85.9	50	125	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		69.8	69.3	68.1	-1.2	82.4	84.9	32	29	25	No Change
Students w/ disabilities		62.5	60.8	63.8	3.0	78.1	81.3	48	58	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	19	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		74.7	69.1	75.5	6.4	85.2	87.4	57	107	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		91.0	82.9	89.1	6.2	94.8	95.5	56	131	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		81.8	66.6	76.9	10.3	89.4	90.9	38	90	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		68.6	57.5	66.1	8.6	81.7	84.3	44	48	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		57.0	57.0	66.9	9.9	60.6	78.5	54	40	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		40.6	48.1	52.5	4.4	50.5	70.3	24	20	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		66.7	49.2	65.0	15.8	80.6	83.4	62	30	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		89.0	71.7	84.1	12.4	93.6	94.5	46	41	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	12.1	10.0	280	0	9.7	8.6	280	25
High needs	4.4	1.9	155	0	14.8	15.5	155	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	4.9	2.4	126	0	14.1	15.1	126	0
EL and Former EL	0.0	3.4	29	25	20.6	17.2	29	25
Students w/ disabilities	1.2	0.0	59	0	31.0	32.2	59	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	19	-	-	-	19	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Hispanic/Latino	1.0	4.6	108	25	15.4	13.0	108	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	20.0	16.0	131	0	7.9	5.3	131	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	22.1	33.3	279	25	11.9	9.7	279	25
High needs	15.0	19.5	154	25	17.1	15.6	154	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	13.9	19.2	125	25	16.7	14.4	125	25
EL and Former EL	5.7	17.2	29	25	17.1	17.2	29	0
Students w/ disabilities	10.2	5.2	58	0	31.8	31.0	58	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	19	-	-	-	19	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Hispanic/Latino	7.5	25.2	107	25	18.9	14.0	107	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	32.4	38.9	131	25	10.6	7.6	131	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	10.6	8.9	90	0	26.9	12.2	90	25
High needs	2.7	2.1	48	0	35.6	22.9	48	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	1.8	2.5	40	25	38.6	20.0	40	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Students w/ disabilities	2.5	0.0	20	0	50.0	40.0	20	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Hispanic/Latino	3.0	0.0	30	0	45.5	20.0	30	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	15.1	12.2	41	0	24.5	4.9	41	25

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		66.0	39.0	-27.0	51.0	Yes	178	75	On Target
High needs		59.5	41.5	-18.0	51.0	No	104	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		59.0	45.0	-14.0	51.0	Yes	86	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	19	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		61.0	34.5	-26.5	51.0	No	38	25	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	13	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		64.0	42.5	-21.5	51.0	Yes	66	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	7	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		64.5	37.5	-27.0	51.0	Yes	86	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		60.0	41.0	-19.0	51.0	Yes	174	75	On Target
High needs		59.5	41.0	-18.5	51.0	Yes	100	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		64.0	41.0	-23.0	51.0	Yes	83	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	19	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		47.0	41.0	-6.0	51.0	Yes	34	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	13	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		56.0	39.0	-17.0	51.0	Yes	63	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	7	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		60.0	43.0	-17.0	51.0	Yes	85	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	84.0	60.0	27.00	25
High needs	84.0	60.0	27.00	25
EL and Former EL	84.0	60.0	27.00	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	293	293	100	Yes	294	293	100	Yes	93	93	100	Yes
High needs	164	164	100	Yes	165	164	99	Yes	51	51	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	134	134	100	Yes	135	134	99	Yes	43	43	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	32	32	100	Yes	32	32	100	Yes	7	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	61	61	100	Yes	61	60	98	Yes	21	21	100	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	19	-	-	-	19	-	-	-	8	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	13	-	-	-	14	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	111	111	100	Yes	111	110	99	Yes	31	31	100	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	11	-	-	-	11	-	-	-	7	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	138	138	100	Yes	138	138	100	Yes	43	43	100	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.