Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Fall Brook

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Fall Brook

Organization Information

District:

Leominster (01530000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

Fall Brook (01530007)

Grades served:

K,01,02,03,04,05

Region:

Central

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 1

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		84.3	90.9	90.1	-0.8	90.8	92.2	70	332	75	On Target
High needs		74.9	85.6	82.7	-2.9	85.4	87.5	80	153	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		86.4	86.4	83.2	-3.2	87.5	93.2	80	110	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		71.7	70.0	73.1	3.1	83.5	85.9	60	27	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		58.7	77.5	73.4	-4.1	75.9	79.4	73	63	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	16	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		73.8	84.8	80.2	-4.6	84.7	86.9	81	97	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		88.0	94.0	94.9	0.9	93.0	94.0	90	207	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		87.4	91.5	94.0	2.5	92.7	93.7	89	333	100	Above Target
High needs		79.7	87.6	88.9	1.3	88.2	89.9	95	155	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		88.9	88.9	88.3	-0.6	89.8	94.5	93	111	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		74.6	81.0	76.9	-4.1	85.2	87.3	59	27	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities		66.7	79.2	82.7	3.5	80.6	83.4	93	65	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	16	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		78.7	87.3	86.3	-1.0	87.6	89.4	90	97	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		90.5	93.3	97.2	3.9	94.5	95.3	98	208	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		80.5	87.0	88.1	1.1	88.6	90.3	75	109	75	On Target
High needs		73.5	74.4	76.9	2.5	84.5	86.8	80	40	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		77.7	77.7	79.0	1.3	79.6	88.9	89	25	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		59.1	-	-	-	-	79.6	-	20	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		70.2	-	78.1	-3.0	82.6	85.1	93	24	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		86.5	94.0	92.2	-1.8	92.1	93.3	85	77	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	16.0	12.3	332	0	2.6	3.3	332	0
High needs	6.8	7.2	153	0	5.5	6.5	153	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	9.1	7.3	110	0	5.1	4.5	110	25
EL and Former EL	0.0	0.0	27	0	20.0	11.1	27	25
Students w/ disabilities	1.7	4.8	63	25	10.0	12.7	63	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	16	-	-	-	16	-
Hispanic/Latino	4.9	5.2	97	0	7.3	7.2	97	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	20.1	15.9	207	0	0.5	1.4	207	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	39.6	45.3	333	25	2.2	3.3	333	0
High needs	28.6	31.0	155	0	4.8	7.1	155	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	29.3	30.6	111	0	4.0	8.1	111	0
EL and Former EL	20.0	22.2	27	25	12.0	25.9	27	0
Students w/ disabilities	18.3	21.5	65	25	8.3	10.8	65	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	16	-	-	-	16	-
Hispanic/Latino	22.9	26.8	97	25	3.6	10.3	97	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	46.7	55.3	208	25	2.0	0.5	208	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	22.4	25.7	109	25	5.1	2.8	109	25
High needs	12.2	7.5	40	0	12.2	7.5	40	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	17.9	8.0	25	0	10.7	8.0	25	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	20	-	-	-	20	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Hispanic/Latino	18.2	12.5	24	0	0.0	8.3	24	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	30.6	31.2	77	0	0.0	1.3	77	0

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		74.0	46.0	-28.0	51.0	No	215	50	Below Target
High needs		75.5	51.0	-24.5	51.0	No	92	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		78.5	50.5	-28.0	51.0	No	64	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	12	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		77.0	55.5	-21.5	51.0	No	40	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	12	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		73.0	40.5	-32.5	51.0	No	60	50	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		74.0	49.0	-25.0	51.0	Yes	138	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		78.5	69.0	-9.5	51.0	Yes	215	100	Above Target
High needs		79.0	68.0	-11.0	51.0	Yes	93	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		79.0	72.0	-7.0	51.0	Yes	64	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	12	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		74.0	59.5	-14.5	51.0	Yes	40	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	12	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		79.0	79.0	0.0	51.0	Yes	60	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		78.5	68.0	-10.5	51.0	Yes	138	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	48.0	60.0	56.00	0
High needs	48.0	60.0	56.00	0
EL and Former EL	48.0	60.0	56.00	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	361	358	99	Yes	361	359	99	Yes	116	115	99	Yes
High needs	177	174	98	Yes	177	176	99	Yes	45	45	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	131	129	98	Yes	131	130	99	Yes	30	30	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	43	43	100	Yes	43	43	100	Yes	13	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	70	68	97	Yes	70	70	100	Yes	23	23	100	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	3	-	-	-	3	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	19	-	-	-	19	-	-	-	6	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	114	113	99	Yes	114	113	99	Yes	27	27	100	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	10	-	-	-	10	-	-	-	3	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	215	213	99	Yes	215	214	100	Yes	79	78	99	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.