Massachusetts School and District Profiles

School for Exceptional Studies

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - School for Exceptional Studies

Organization Information

District:

Lawrence (01490000)

School type:

Middle-High School or K-12

School:

School for Exceptional Studies (01490537)

Grades served:

01,02,03,04,05,06,07,08,09,10,11,12

Region:

Commissioner's Districts

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 3

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		74.1	61.9	63.9	2.0	84.9	87.1	5	99	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		74.1	61.9	63.9	2.0	84.9	87.1	3	99	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		61.6	61.6	62.3	0.7	64.8	80.8	3	81	50	Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		74.1	62.6	63.9	1.3	84.9	87.1	24	99	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		71.8	62.8	67.3	4.5	83.6	85.9	5	84	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		60.8	51.0	56.9	5.9	77.1	80.4	12	101	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		61.0	51.0	56.9	5.9	77.3	80.5	14	101	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		48.9	48.9	57.2	8.3	53.2	74.5	13	83	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		60.8	51.6	56.9	5.3	77.1	80.4	58	101	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		59.1	51.9	59.7	7.8	76.1	79.6	29	85	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		57.3	60.7	54.6	-6.1	75.1	78.7	12	38	0	Declined
High needs		57.5	60.7	54.6	-6.1	75.2	78.8	13	38	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		61.6	61.6	53.2	-8.4	64.8	80.8	10	31	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		57.5	60.7	54.6	-6.1	75.2	78.8	40	38	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		59.3	56.8	56.7	-0.1	76.3	79.7	25	30	25	No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	0.0	0.0	99	0	29.9	32.3	99	0
High needs	0.0	0.0	99	0	29.9	32.3	99	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	0.0	0.0	81	0	29.6	34.6	81	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	14	-	-	-	14	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	99	0	30.1	32.3	99	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Hispanic/Latino	0.0	0.0	84	0	28.0	26.2	84	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	0.0	1.0	101	25	53.1	46.5	101	25
High needs	0.0	1.0	101	25	53.1	46.5	101	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	0.0	1.2	83	25	56.3	47.0	83	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	14	-	-	-	14	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	1.0	101	25	53.3	46.5	101	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Hispanic/Latino	0.0	1.2	85	25	51.9	42.4	85	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	0.0	0.0	38	0	33.3	44.7	38	0
High needs	0.0	0.0	38	0	33.3	44.7	38	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	0.0	0.0	31	0	28.6	51.6	31	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	38	0	33.3	44.7	38	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Hispanic/Latino	0.0	0.0	30	0	42.4	40.0	30	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		30.0	31.0	1.0	51.0	Yes	55	75	On Target
High needs		30.0	31.0	1.0	51.0	Yes	55	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		28.0	30.0	2.0	51.0	Yes	44	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	9	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		28.5	31.0	2.5	51.0	Yes	55	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		31.0	31.0	0.0	51.0	Yes	47	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		29.0	38.0	9.0	51.0	Yes	55	75	On Target
High needs		29.0	38.0	9.0	51.0	Yes	55	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		26.0	41.0	15.0	51.0	Yes	44	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	9	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		32.0	38.0	6.0	51.0	No	55	50	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		27.0	47.0	20.0	51.0	Yes	46	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	7	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	9.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	9.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	9.00	-

Summary > 2016

2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	19	-	-
High needs		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	18	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	17	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	18	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	1	-	-

Summary > 2016

2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2013 Rate	2014 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		33.3	40.0	6.7	85.0	95.0	20	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		33.3	40.0	6.7	85.0	95.0	20	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	20	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	17	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	1	-	-

Summary > 2016

2015 Annual Dropout Rate About the Data
	0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20	Baseline Rate	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	Dropout Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		27.1	18.2	10.0	8.2	15.8	13.6	10	80	100	Above Target
High needs		25.0	17.6	10.4	7.2	14.6	12.5	9	77	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		10.0	-	-	-	-	5.0	-	50	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		23.4	17.7	9.5	8.2	13.7	11.7	10	74	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		27.0	18.3	12.3	6.0	15.8	13.5	9	65	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-

Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more) About the Data
	2015 Number of Dropouts Reengaged	PPI Points
All students	-	-
High needs	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	109	105	96	Yes	111	108	97	Yes	48	46	96	Yes
High needs	109	105	96	Yes	111	108	97	Yes	48	46	96	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	91	87	96	Yes	93	90	97	Yes	40	38	95	Yes
EL and Former EL	16	-	-	-	16	-	-	-	8	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	109	105	96	Yes	111	108	97	Yes	48	46	96	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	90	88	98	Yes	92	90	98	Yes	38	37	97	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	15	-	-	-	15	-	-	-	8	-	-	-

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.