Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Health & Human Services High School

Districts
Schools

2016

This organization is currently closed.

2016 Accountability Data - Health & Human Services High School

Organization Information

District:

Lawrence (01490000)

School type:

High School

School:

Health & Human Services High School (01490531)

Grades served:

09,10,11,12

Region:

Commissioner's Districts

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 1

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		73.5	95.7	94.8	-0.9	84.5	86.8	18	135	100	Above Target
High needs		72.0	95.1	93.6	-1.5	83.7	86.0	42	110	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		95.5	95.5	95.1	-0.4	95.9	97.8	44	96	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		59.5	-	-	-	-	79.8	-	42	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	25	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		72.5	95.8	94.6	-1.2	84.0	86.3	64	125	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		60.2	82.1	87.3	5.2	76.8	80.1	28	134	100	Above Target
High needs		59.1	81.1	85.8	4.7	76.1	79.6	65	109	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		81.4	81.4	89.2	7.8	83.0	90.7	71	95	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		44.4	-	-	-	-	72.2	-	42	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	24	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		59.1	81.8	86.7	4.9	76.1	79.6	80	124	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		61.8	72.7	89.8	17.1	77.7	80.9	36	115	100	Above Target
High needs		61.5	71.6	87.5	15.9	77.5	80.8	68	90	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		71.2	71.2	89.9	18.7	73.6	85.6	74	79	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		54.8	-	-	-	-	77.4	-	27	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	22	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		60.5	72.9	89.6	16.7	77.0	80.3	93	106	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	17.1	30.4	135	25	1.0	3.0	135	0
High needs	15.1	26.4	110	25	1.2	3.6	110	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	16.7	28.1	96	25	1.3	3.1	96	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	42	-	-	-	42	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	25	-	-	-	25	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Hispanic/Latino	18.0	28.8	125	25	1.0	3.2	125	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	25.7	40.3	134	25	8.6	6.7	134	25
High needs	22.1	33.0	109	25	10.5	8.3	109	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	24.4	35.8	95	25	11.5	6.3	95	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	42	-	-	-	42	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	24	-	-	-	24	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Hispanic/Latino	27.0	38.7	124	25	9.0	7.3	124	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	5.1	10.4	115	25	6.1	4.3	115	25
High needs	4.9	10.0	90	25	4.9	5.6	90	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	5.5	10.1	79	25	5.5	5.1	79	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	27	-	-	-	27	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	22	-	-	-	22	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Hispanic/Latino	5.3	9.4	106	25	6.4	4.7	106	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		54.0	73.0	19.0	51.0	No	117	100	Above Target
High needs		52.0	72.0	20.0	51.0	No	92	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		50.0	73.0	23.0	51.0	No	81	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	28	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	18	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		54.5	73.0	18.5	51.0	No	107	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		68.0	83.0	15.0	51.0	Yes	116	100	Above Target
High needs		72.0	83.0	11.0	51.0	Yes	91	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		72.0	83.5	11.5	51.0	Yes	80	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	28	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	17	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		71.0	85.0	14.0	51.0	Yes	106	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	79.5	60.0	84.00	25
High needs	79.5	60.0	84.00	25
EL and Former EL	79.5	60.0	84.00	-

Summary > 2016

2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		85.8	90.6	4.8	80.0	90.0	127	75	On Target
High needs		85.4	90.5	5.1	80.0	90.0	126	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	36	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	21	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		86.8	90.8	4.0	80.0	90.0	120	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	4	-	-

Summary > 2016

2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2013 Rate	2014 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		79.7	89.0	9.3	85.0	95.0	127	75	On Target
High needs		80.2	88.6	8.4	85.0	95.0	123	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	23	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	35	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	5	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		78.6	89.5	10.9	85.0	95.0	114	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	7	-	-

Summary > 2016

2015 Annual Dropout Rate About the Data
	0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20	Baseline Rate	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	Dropout Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		7.1	1.2	0.8	0.4	4.1	3.6	58	520	100	Above Target
High needs		6.8	1.2	1.0	0.2	4.0	3.4	68	416	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		0.6	-	-	-	-	0.3	-	339	-	-
EL and Former EL		12.1	1.3	1.1	0.2	7.1	6.1	75	89	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	118	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		7.5	1.2	0.8	0.4	4.4	3.8	66	491	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	17	-	-

Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more) About the Data
	2015 Number of Dropouts Reengaged	PPI Points
All students	-	-
High needs	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	140	139	99	Yes	141	139	99	Yes	141	139	99	Yes
High needs	114	113	99	Yes	115	113	98	Yes	115	113	98	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	99	98	99	Yes	100	98	98	Yes	100	98	98	Yes
EL and Former EL	43	43	100	Yes	44	44	100	Yes	44	44	100	Yes
Students w/ disabilities	27	27	100	Yes	28	-	-	-	28	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	4	-	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	129	128	99	Yes	130	128	98	Yes	130	128	98	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	5	-	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-	-	-

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.