Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Francis M Leahy Middle

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - UP Academy Leonard Middle School

Organization Information

District:

Lawrence (01490000)

School type:

Middle School

School:

UP Academy Leonard Middle School (01490090)

Grades served:

06,07,08

Region:

Commissioner's Districts

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 1

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		67.6	80.2	80.0	-0.2	81.1	83.8	13	317	75	On Target
High needs		67.4	79.0	78.3	-0.7	81.0	83.7	39	274	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		79.7	79.7	79.3	-0.4	81.4	89.9	29	235	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		49.6	65.2	69.4	4.2	70.6	74.8	41	108	75	On Target
Students w/ disabilities		46.6	65.7	55.1	-10.6	68.9	73.3	15	59	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		67.6	80.0	79.3	-0.7	81.1	83.8	39	305	25	No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		43.2	71.6	70.6	-1.0	66.9	71.6	22	314	100	Above Target
High needs		42.8	70.4	67.6	-2.8	66.6	71.4	68	271	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		71.0	71.0	68.0	-3.0	73.4	85.5	49	232	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		31.4	63.9	58.3	-5.6	60.0	65.7	49	108	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities		23.7	49.5	39.2	-10.3	55.5	61.9	14	60	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		43.2	71.7	70.0	-1.7	66.9	71.6	64	303	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		33.0	67.7	63.8	-3.9	60.9	66.5	21	116	100	Above Target
High needs		33.0	66.8	60.3	-6.5	60.9	66.5	48	102	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		69.4	69.4	61.5	-7.9	72.0	84.7	48	85	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		25.0	50.7	48.1	-2.6	56.3	62.5	75	39	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities		25.0	-	-	-	-	62.5	-	25	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		33.2	66.9	63.4	-3.5	61.0	66.6	74	112	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	10.2	7.3	317	0	12.5	12.6	317	0
High needs	9.4	5.1	274	0	13.5	13.9	274	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	10.5	6.0	235	0	13.4	11.9	235	25
EL and Former EL	3.3	1.9	108	0	26.1	23.1	108	25
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	59	0	24.1	33.9	59	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Hispanic/Latino	10.5	6.9	305	0	12.6	13.1	305	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	18.4	20.4	314	25	22.4	23.2	314	0
High needs	15.8	16.6	271	0	23.8	26.6	271	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	16.5	16.8	232	0	22.4	25.0	232	0
EL and Former EL	13.0	12.0	108	0	31.5	40.7	108	0
Students w/ disabilities	1.9	1.7	60	0	53.7	61.7	60	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Hispanic/Latino	18.7	19.1	303	0	22.5	23.8	303	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	1.0	2.6	116	25	19.4	25.0	116	0
High needs	1.1	2.0	102	25	21.3	28.4	102	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	1.3	2.4	85	25	18.8	25.9	85	0
EL and Former EL	0.0	0.0	39	0	40.5	48.7	39	0
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	25	-	-	-	25	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Hispanic/Latino	1.0	2.7	112	25	20.2	25.9	112	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		67.0	53.0	-14.0	51.0	No	285	75	On Target
High needs		69.0	51.0	-18.0	51.0	No	242	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		65.0	51.0	-14.0	51.0	No	215	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		79.0	59.0	-20.0	51.0	No	80	75	On Target
Students w/ disabilities		56.5	42.0	-14.5	51.0	No	53	50	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		69.5	52.0	-17.5	51.0	No	273	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	9	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		72.0	70.0	-2.0	51.0	No	283	100	Above Target
High needs		72.0	69.5	-2.5	51.0	No	240	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		71.0	68.5	-2.5	51.0	No	212	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		80.0	72.0	-8.0	51.0	No	81	100	Above Target
Students w/ disabilities		58.0	62.0	4.0	51.0	No	53	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		73.0	70.0	-3.0	51.0	No	272	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	9	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	63.0	60.0	81.00	25
High needs	63.0	60.0	81.00	25
EL and Former EL	63.0	60.0	81.00	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	354	349	99	Yes	354	346	98	Yes	123	123	100	Yes
High needs	310	306	99	Yes	310	303	98	Yes	109	109	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	260	257	99	Yes	260	254	98	Yes	91	91	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	139	137	99	Yes	139	137	99	Yes	45	45	100	Yes
Students w/ disabilities	63	61	97	Yes	63	62	98	Yes	25	25	100	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	4	-	-	-	4	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	341	336	99	Yes	341	334	98	Yes	119	119	100	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	9	-	-	-	9	-	-	-	3	-	-	-

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.