Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Edward F. Parthum
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Edward F. Parthum
Organization Information
District:Lawrence (01490000)School type:Elementary School
School:Edward F. Parthum (01490053)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04
Region:Commissioner's DistrictsTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 3
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 65.3, Target = 82.4CPI = 65.3, Target = 82.4CPI = 65.3, Target = 82.4 69.9 67.4 65.3 -2.1 82.4 85.0 523325No Change
High needsCPI = 62.6, Target = 82.2CPI = 62.6, Target = 82.2CPI = 62.6, Target = 82.2 69.4 65.0 62.6 -2.4 82.2 84.7 719625No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 62.8, Target = 68.7CPI = 62.8, Target = 68.7CPI = 62.8, Target = 68.7 65.8 65.8 62.8 -3.0 68.7 82.9 71660Declined
EL and Former ELCPI = 57.9, Target = 78.1CPI = 57.9, Target = 78.1CPI = 57.9, Target = 78.1 62.5 60.7 57.9 -2.8 78.1 81.3 13920Declined
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 42.8, Target = 68.3CPI = 42.8, Target = 68.3CPI = 42.8, Target = 68.3 45.7 48.1 42.8 -5.3 68.3 72.9 6450Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 64.5, Target = 81.5CPI = 64.5, Target = 81.5CPI = 64.5, Target = 81.5 68.3 67.3 64.5 -2.8 81.5 84.2 192070Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------20--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 75.5, Target = 82.6CPI = 75.5, Target = 82.6CPI = 75.5, Target = 82.6 70.2 72.6 75.5 2.9 82.6 85.1 1623250Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 73.3, Target = 82.3CPI = 73.3, Target = 82.3CPI = 73.3, Target = 82.3 69.7 70.4 73.3 2.9 82.3 84.9 3919550Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 73.6, Target = 73.5CPI = 73.6, Target = 73.5 71.1 71.1 73.6 2.5 73.5 85.6 3916575On Target
EL and Former ELCPI = 70.7, Target = 79.4CPI = 70.7, Target = 79.4CPI = 70.7, Target = 79.4 64.7 68.0 70.7 2.7 79.4 82.4 419250Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 57.2, Target = 65.5CPI = 57.2, Target = 65.5CPI = 57.2, Target = 65.5 40.9 59.3 57.2 -2.1 65.5 70.5 284525No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 74, Target = 81.5CPI = 74, Target = 81.5CPI = 74, Target = 81.5 68.3 72.0 74.0 2.0 81.5 84.2 5020650Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------20--
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All students ----------
High needs ----------
Econ. Disadvantaged ----------
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities ----------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White ----------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 2.2 1.72330 21.2 23.62330
High needs 1.0 0.51960 23.2 25.01960
Econ. Disadvantaged 1.2 0.61660 23.6 25.31660
EL and Former EL 0.0 1.19225 25.7 31.5920
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0450 55.6 46.74525
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino 1.9 1.42070 21.2 24.62070
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--20---20-
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 16.5 21.123225 17.0 16.42320
High needs 13.2 17.419525 18.8 17.91950
Econ. Disadvantaged 13.0 18.816525 18.0 15.816525
EL and Former EL 12.6 12.0920 19.4 22.8920
Students w/ disabilities 3.7 8.94525 33.3 33.3450
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino 15.6 19.920625 17.1 18.02060
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--20---20-
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students--------
High needs--------
Econ. Disadvantaged--------
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51 47.0 39.0 -8.0 51.0No9325Below Target
High needsSGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51 46.0 39.0 -7.0 51.0No7625Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51 48.5 34.0 -14.5 51.0No6325Below Target
EL and Former ELSGP = 48.5, Target = 51SGP = 48.5, Target = 51SGP = 48.5, Target = 51 41.0 48.5 7.5 51.0No4050Below Target
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51 47.0 39.0 -8.0 51.0No8425Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-7--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 50, Target = 51SGP = 50, Target = 51 45.0 50.0 5.0 51.0Yes9375On Target
High needsSGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51 44.0 49.0 5.0 51.0Yes7675On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51 43.0 48.0 5.0 51.0No6350Below Target
EL and Former ELSGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51 51.5 46.0 -5.5 51.0Yes4175On Target
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51 47.0 49.0 2.0 51.0Yes8475On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-7--
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 78.0 60.013625
High needs 78.0 60.013625
EL and Former EL 78.0 60.013625
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students259258100Yes25825699Yes----
High needs221221100Yes220219100Yes----
Econ. Disadvantaged181181100Yes18017999Yes----
EL and Former EL110110100Yes110110100Yes----
Students w/ disabilities4848100Yes4848100Yes----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian------------
Afr. Amer./Black2---2-------
Hispanic/Latino231230100Yes23022899Yes----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.4---4-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White22---22-------

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles