Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Parthum Middle School

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Parthum Middle School

Organization Information

District:

Lawrence (01490000)

School type:

Middle School

School:

Parthum Middle School (01490027)

Grades served:

05,06,07,08

Region:

Commissioner's Districts

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 1

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		80.2	75.1	80.6	5.5	88.5	90.1	15	503	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		79.4	72.7	77.9	5.2	88.0	89.7	37	406	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		74.3	74.3	79.5	5.2	76.4	87.2	30	349	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		56.1	59.6	68.1	8.5	74.4	78.1	39	145	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		63.0	58.1	62.7	4.6	78.4	81.5	31	83	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		79.3	75.1	80.5	5.4	87.9	89.7	44	459	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		87.0	77.4	83.6	6.2	92.4	93.5	11	32	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		55.6	71.6	70.9	-0.7	74.1	77.8	23	501	25	No Change
High needs		54.2	68.2	68.8	0.6	73.3	77.1	73	405	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		70.0	70.0	70.4	0.4	72.5	85.0	60	348	50	Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL		38.0	51.8	61.7	9.9	63.8	69.0	61	145	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		35.6	51.6	50.9	-0.7	62.4	67.8	52	83	25	No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		55.3	71.6	71.4	-0.2	73.9	77.7	70	457	25	No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		56.7	71.3	61.7	-9.6	74.7	78.4	3	32	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		42.5	56.5	52.0	-4.5	66.5	71.3	9	249	0	Declined
High needs		41.7	54.0	49.4	-4.6	66.0	70.9	12	204	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		55.2	55.2	51.6	-3.6	58.9	77.6	18	168	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		30.4	42.5	36.1	-6.4	59.4	65.2	31	79	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities		32.0	44.8	45.0	0.2	60.3	66.0	23	40	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		41.7	55.5	52.0	-3.5	66.0	70.9	35	234	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	6.3	5.0	503	0	14.7	9.7	503	25
High needs	4.9	3.9	406	0	16.5	11.1	406	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	5.4	4.6	349	0	15.0	10.9	349	25
EL and Former EL	0.0	2.1	145	25	30.1	20.0	145	25
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	83	0	25.0	21.7	83	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Hispanic/Latino	5.8	4.8	459	0	14.4	9.8	459	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	9.8	6.3	32	0	9.8	6.3	32	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	14.3	14.0	501	0	21.4	23.8	501	0
High needs	10.8	11.9	405	25	25.1	26.2	405	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	11.1	12.1	348	0	22.8	23.9	348	0
EL and Former EL	7.2	8.3	145	25	45.6	35.2	145	25
Students w/ disabilities	3.8	2.4	83	0	50.0	47.0	83	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Hispanic/Latino	14.1	14.0	457	0	20.9	23.2	457	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	17.1	12.5	32	0	26.8	34.4	32	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	2.2	0.4	249	0	33.7	37.8	249	0
High needs	2.2	0.0	204	0	36.1	41.2	204	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	2.4	0.0	168	0	33.8	38.7	168	0
EL and Former EL	0.0	0.0	79	0	54.3	62.0	79	0
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	40	0	58.3	52.5	40	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Hispanic/Latino	2.0	0.4	234	0	34.3	38.0	234	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		46.0	56.5	10.5	51.0	Yes	468	75	On Target
High needs		45.5	55.0	9.5	51.0	Yes	373	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		46.5	54.0	7.5	51.0	Yes	328	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		55.0	58.0	3.0	51.0	Yes	123	75	On Target
Students w/ disabilities		48.0	60.0	12.0	51.0	No	71	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	9	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		47.0	57.0	10.0	51.0	Yes	425	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		36.0	45.5	9.5	51.0	Yes	32	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		59.0	47.0	-12.0	51.0	No	472	50	Below Target
High needs		58.0	49.0	-9.0	51.0	No	378	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		58.0	47.0	-11.0	51.0	No	333	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		67.0	59.0	-8.0	51.0	Yes	125	75	On Target
Students w/ disabilities		66.5	46.5	-20.0	51.0	No	72	50	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	9	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		60.0	47.0	-13.0	51.0	No	429	50	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		61.0	30.5	-30.5	51.0	No	32	25	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	61.0	60.0	85.00	25
High needs	61.0	60.0	85.00	25
EL and Former EL	61.0	60.0	85.00	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	553	551	100	Yes	556	553	99	Yes	280	280	100	Yes
High needs	454	453	100	Yes	457	456	100	Yes	235	235	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	382	381	100	Yes	382	381	100	Yes	188	188	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	180	180	100	Yes	184	184	100	Yes	104	104	100	Yes
Students w/ disabilities	88	88	100	Yes	88	88	100	Yes	44	44	100	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	11	-	-	-	11	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	505	503	100	Yes	508	505	99	Yes	264	264	100	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	3	-	-	-	3	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	33	33	100	Yes	33	33	100	Yes	12	-	-	-

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.