Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Gerard A. Guilmette
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Gerard A. Guilmette
Organization Information
District:Lawrence (01490000)School type:Elementary School
School:Gerard A. Guilmette (01490022)Grades served:01,02,03,04
Region:Commissioner's DistrictsTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 76.1, Target = 81.8CPI = 76.1, Target = 81.8CPI = 76.1, Target = 81.8 68.8 77.7 76.1 -1.6 81.8 84.4 1822725No Change
High needsCPI = 75.2, Target = 81.2CPI = 75.2, Target = 81.2CPI = 75.2, Target = 81.2 67.8 75.6 75.2 -0.4 81.2 83.9 4621325No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 75.7, Target = 79.1CPI = 75.7, Target = 79.1CPI = 75.7, Target = 79.1 77.2 77.2 75.7 -1.5 79.1 88.6 4518825No Change
EL and Former ELCPI = 72.6, Target = 78.1CPI = 72.6, Target = 78.1CPI = 72.6, Target = 78.1 62.4 68.8 72.6 3.8 78.1 81.2 5712650Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 49, Target = 72.2CPI = 49, Target = 72.2CPI = 49, Target = 72.2 52.4 61.2 49.0 -12.2 72.2 76.2 12480Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 76, Target = 81.4CPI = 76, Target = 81.4CPI = 76, Target = 81.4 68.1 77.4 76.0 -1.4 81.4 84.1 6421725No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------6--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 81.2, Target = 84.4CPI = 81.2, Target = 84.4CPI = 81.2, Target = 84.4 73.3 86.0 81.2 -4.8 84.4 86.7 312260Declined
High needsCPI = 80.8, Target = 84.2CPI = 80.8, Target = 84.2CPI = 80.8, Target = 84.2 72.9 84.6 80.8 -3.8 84.2 86.5 712120Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 80.6, Target = 86.5CPI = 80.6, Target = 86.5CPI = 80.6, Target = 86.5 85.3 85.3 80.6 -4.7 86.5 92.7 691870Declined
EL and Former ELCPI = 78.8, Target = 82.2CPI = 78.8, Target = 82.2CPI = 78.8, Target = 82.2 69.5 80.2 78.8 -1.4 82.2 84.8 6612525No Change
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 62.8, Target = 73.3CPI = 62.8, Target = 73.3CPI = 62.8, Target = 73.3 54.3 71.6 62.8 -8.8 73.3 77.2 45470Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 81.3, Target = 83.9CPI = 81.3, Target = 83.9CPI = 81.3, Target = 83.9 72.4 86.2 81.3 -4.9 83.9 86.2 782160Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------6--
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All students ----------
High needs ----------
Econ. Disadvantaged ----------
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities ----------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White ----------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 7.8 4.82270 11.9 12.32270
High needs 6.7 4.72130 13.8 13.12130
Econ. Disadvantaged 6.6 4.81880 11.7 13.31880
EL and Former EL 4.8 4.01260 18.1 14.312625
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0480 37.9 41.7480
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino 7.9 4.62170 11.8 12.92170
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--6---6-
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 34.0 21.72260 8.6 9.72260
High needs 31.0 20.82120 9.5 10.42120
Econ. Disadvantaged 32.1 19.31870 8.7 9.61870
EL and Former EL 24.8 17.61250 11.4 12.01250
Students w/ disabilities 17.2 2.1470 27.6 29.8470
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino 35.8 21.82160 8.3 9.72160
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--6---6-
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students--------
High needs--------
Econ. Disadvantaged--------
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51 59.5 45.0 -14.5 51.0No11050Below Target
High needsSGP = 45.5, Target = 51SGP = 45.5, Target = 51SGP = 45.5, Target = 51 59.0 45.5 -13.5 51.0No10450Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 47.5, Target = 51SGP = 47.5, Target = 51SGP = 47.5, Target = 51 59.0 47.5 -11.5 51.0No9850Below Target
EL and Former ELSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 64.0 53.0 -11.0 51.0No5575On Target
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-23--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 47.5, Target = 51SGP = 47.5, Target = 51SGP = 47.5, Target = 51 59.5 47.5 -12.0 51.0No10650Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-2--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 24.5, Target = 51SGP = 24.5, Target = 51SGP = 24.5, Target = 51 54.0 24.5 -29.5 51.0No1100Below Target
High needsSGP = 26.5, Target = 51SGP = 26.5, Target = 51SGP = 26.5, Target = 51 51.0 26.5 -24.5 51.0No1040Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 24.5, Target = 51SGP = 24.5, Target = 51SGP = 24.5, Target = 51 50.0 24.5 -25.5 51.0No980Below Target
EL and Former ELSGP = 28, Target = 51SGP = 28, Target = 51SGP = 28, Target = 51 48.5 28.0 -20.5 51.0No550Below Target
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-23--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 26, Target = 51SGP = 26, Target = 51SGP = 26, Target = 51 54.0 26.0 -28.0 51.0No1060Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-2--
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 67.0 60.014125
High needs 67.0 60.014125
EL and Former EL 67.0 60.014125
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students251251100Yes25124999Yes----
High needs237237100Yes23723599Yes----
Econ. Disadvantaged207207100Yes20720599Yes----
EL and Former EL142142100Yes14214199Yes----
Students w/ disabilities5050100Yes504998Yes----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian1---1-------
Afr. Amer./Black3---3-------
Hispanic/Latino239239100Yes239238100Yes----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.------------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White8---8-------

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles