Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Hull High
District not selectedDistricts School selectedSchools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Hull High
Organization Information
District:Hull (01420000)School type:High School
School:Hull High (01420505)Grades served:09,10,11,12
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 97.5, Target = 99.2 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 97.5, Target = 99.2 75 or Higher All Students 98.6 96.3 97.5 1.2 99.2 99.3 4159100Above Target
High needs -------18--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------10--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 97.2, Target = 99.2 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 97.2, Target = 99.2 75 or Higher White 98.6 96.9 97.2 0.3 99.2 99.3 215450Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 88.3, Target = 96.5 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 88.3, Target = 96.5 75 or Higher All Students 94.0 91.8 88.3 -3.5 96.5 97.0 31600Declined
High needs -------18--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------10--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 90, Target = 96.4 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 90, Target = 96.4 75 or Higher White 93.8 93.3 90.0 -3.3 96.4 96.9 22550Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 93.2, Target = 97.8 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 93.2, Target = 97.8 75 or Higher All Students 96.2 95.8 93.2 -2.6 97.8 98.1 56590Declined
High needs -------19--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------12--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 92.9, Target = 97.7 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 92.9, Target = 97.7 75 or Higher White 96.1 97.2 92.9 -4.3 97.7 98.1 41560Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 52.4 40.7590 1.2 0.05925
High needs--18---18-
Econ. Disadvantaged--10---10-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--12---12-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 54.8 40.7540 1.4 0.05425
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 49.4 61.76025 3.8 6.7600
High needs--18---18-
Econ. Disadvantaged--10---10-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--12---12-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 50.7 63.65525 1.4 5.5550
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 44.9 42.4590 0.0 3.4590
High needs--19---19-
Econ. Disadvantaged--12---12-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--14---14-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--1---1-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 45.1 42.9560 0.0 3.6560
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 52, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 52, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 63.0 52.0 -11.0 51.0Yes5575On Target
High needs --- 51.0-16--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-9--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 50.5, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 50.5, Target = 5175 or Higher White 63.0 50.5 -12.5 51.0No5275On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 35.5, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 35.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 53.0 35.5 -17.5 51.0No5625Below Target
High needs --- 51.0-16--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-9--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 34, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 34, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 53.5 34.0 -19.5 51.0No5325Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.02.00-
High needs- 60.02.00-
EL and Former EL- 60.02.00-
Summary > 2016
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 92.3, Target = 80 - All StudentsAll Students-Cohort Graduation Rate = 92.3, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 92.3, Target = 8075 or Higher All Students 82.7 92.3 9.6 80.0 90.09175On Target
High needs --- 80.0 90.050--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 80.0 90.0---
EL and Former EL --- 80.0 90.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 80.0 90.014--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 80.0 90.0---
Asian --- 80.0 90.0---
Afr. Amer./Black --- 80.0 90.02--
Hispanic/Latino --- 80.0 90.04--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 80.0 90.0---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 80.0 90.01--
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 91.7, Target = 80 - WhiteWhite-Cohort Graduation Rate = 91.7, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 91.7, Target = 8075 or Higher White 83.3 91.7 8.4 80.0 90.08475On Target
Summary > 2016
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2013 Rate 2014 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 85.2, Target = 85 - All StudentsAll Students-Cohort Graduation Rate = 85.2, Target = 8575 or Higher All Students 96.7 85.2 -11.5 85.0 95.08175On Target
High needs --- 85.0 95.037--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 85.0 95.0---
EL and Former EL --- 85.0 95.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 85.0 95.013--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Asian --- 85.0 95.0---
Afr. Amer./Black --- 85.0 95.01--
Hispanic/Latino --- 85.0 95.02--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 85.0 95.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 85.9, Target = 85 - WhiteWhite-Cohort Graduation Rate = 85.9, Target = 8575 or Higher White 97.7 85.9 -11.8 85.0 95.07875On Target
Summary > 2016
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
  0  2  4  6  8  10 12  14 16  18 20 Baseline Rate 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal Dropout Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsDropout Rate = 2, Target = 1.3Dropout Rate 75 or Higher All Students 2.2 0.9 2.0 -1.1 1.3 1.1323420Declined
High needs -------125--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------91--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------51--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------7--
Hispanic/Latino -------11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------2--
WhiteDropout Rate = 2.2, Target = 1.2Dropout Rate 75 or Higher White 2.0 0.9 2.2 -1.3 1.2 1.0203140Declined
Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more)
  2015 Number of Dropouts Reengaged PPI Points
All students--
High needs--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students636095Yes636197Yes6363100Yes
High needs21---21---21---
Econ. Disadvantaged13---13---13---
EL and Former EL1---1---1---
Students w/ disabilities15---15---15---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian------------
Afr. Amer./Black1---1---1---
Hispanic/Latino2---2---2---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.2---2---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White585595Yes585697Yes5858100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles