Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Lillian M Jacobs
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Lillian M Jacobs
Organization Information
District:Hull (01420000)School type:Elementary School
School:Lillian M Jacobs (01420015)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91.2, Target = 92.6CPI = 91.2, Target = 92.6CPI = 91.2, Target = 92.6 87.3 82.2 91.2 9.0 92.6 93.7 7518250Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 82.6, Target = 87.8CPI = 82.6, Target = 87.8CPI = 82.6, Target = 87.8 79.0 71.8 82.6 10.8 87.8 89.5 806950Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 84.7, Target = 73.1CPI = 84.7, Target = 73.1CPI = 84.7, Target = 73.1 70.7 70.7 84.7 14.0 73.1 85.4 8654100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 67.2, Target = 84.3CPI = 67.2, Target = 84.3CPI = 67.2, Target = 84.3 73.0 63.5 67.2 3.7 84.3 86.5 582950Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 91.2, Target = 92.8CPI = 91.2, Target = 92.8CPI = 91.2, Target = 92.8 87.6 82.2 91.2 9.0 92.8 93.8 6818150Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91.3, Target = 90CPI = 91.3, Target = 90CPI = 91.3, Target = 90 82.9 82.1 91.3 9.2 90.0 91.5 77182100Above Target
High needsCPI = 87, Target = 84.7CPI = 87, Target = 84.7CPI = 87, Target = 84.7 73.8 71.4 87.0 15.6 84.7 86.9 9169100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 88.9, Target = 73.1CPI = 88.9, Target = 73.1CPI = 88.9, Target = 73.1 70.7 70.7 88.9 18.2 73.1 85.4 9454100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 77.6, Target = 80.4CPI = 77.6, Target = 80.4CPI = 77.6, Target = 80.4 66.4 60.6 77.6 17.0 80.4 83.2 822950Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 91.3, Target = 90CPI = 91.3, Target = 90CPI = 91.3, Target = 90 82.9 82.0 91.3 9.3 90.0 91.5 71181100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 84.1, Target = 89CPI = 84.1, Target = 89CPI = 84.1, Target = 89 81.2 79.0 84.1 5.1 89.0 90.6 616350Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 73.9, Target = 85.9CPI = 73.9, Target = 85.9CPI = 73.9, Target = 85.9 75.8 67.9 73.9 6.0 85.9 87.9 722350Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------18--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 84.1, Target = 88.7CPI = 84.1, Target = 88.7CPI = 84.1, Target = 88.7 80.7 78.7 84.1 5.4 88.7 90.4 466350Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 10.3 22.018225 5.7 2.218225
High needs 2.9 10.16925 14.3 4.36925
Econ. Disadvantaged 3.4 13.05425 13.8 5.65425
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0290 23.1 10.32925
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 10.4 22.118125 5.7 2.218125
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 22.7 44.018225 6.7 2.218225
High needs 7.1 26.16925 14.3 2.96925
Econ. Disadvantaged 6.9 27.85425 13.8 0.05425
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities 3.8 13.82925 26.9 6.92925
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 22.9 43.618125 6.8 2.218125
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 8.7 14.36325 8.7 3.26325
High needs 3.6 13.02325 17.9 8.72325
Econ. Disadvantaged--18---18-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--11---11-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 7.4 14.36325 8.8 3.26325
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 67, Target = 51SGP = 67, Target = 51SGP = 67, Target = 51 24.0 67.0 43.0 51.0Yes113100Above Target
High needsSGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51 24.0 56.0 32.0 51.0Yes41100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51 21.0 54.0 33.0 51.0Yes35100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 67, Target = 51SGP = 67, Target = 51SGP = 67, Target = 51 24.0 67.0 43.0 51.0Yes113100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51 27.0 55.0 28.0 51.0Yes113100Above Target
High needsSGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51 24.0 58.0 34.0 51.0Yes41100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51 25.0 58.0 33.0 51.0Yes35100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51 27.0 55.0 28.0 51.0Yes113100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students18418299Yes18418299Yes646398Yes
High needs706999Yes706999Yes2323100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged5454100Yes5454100Yes18---
EL and Former EL1---1---1---
Students w/ disabilities302997Yes302997Yes11---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian------------
Afr. Amer./Black------------
Hispanic/Latino------------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.1---1-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White18318199Yes18318199Yes646398Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles