Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Maurice A Donahue Elementary

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Maurice A Donahue Elementary

Organization Information

District:

Holyoke (01370000)

School type:

Elementary-Middle School

School:

Maurice A Donahue Elementary (01370060)

Grades served:

PK,K,01,02,03,04,05,06,07,08

Region:

Commissioner's Districts

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 3

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		74.6	70.2	67.1	-3.1	85.2	87.3	12	306	0	Declined
High needs		74.2	66.8	65.6	-1.2	85.0	87.1	16	261	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		65.6	65.6	65.2	-0.4	68.5	82.8	14	225	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		74.3	62.0	63.4	1.4	85.0	87.2	32	101	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		68.8	61.0	61.0	0.0	81.8	84.4	49	98	25	No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	16	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		71.2	66.8	64.3	-2.5	83.2	85.6	15	246	25	No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		88.1	86.0	83.3	-2.7	93.1	94.1	22	39	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		63.7	55.9	56.8	0.9	78.8	81.9	11	303	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		63.0	54.0	56.5	2.5	78.4	81.5	16	259	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		51.3	51.3	55.2	3.9	55.4	75.7	15	223	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		66.4	50.8	55.9	5.1	80.4	83.2	26	101	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		64.0	57.9	56.6	-1.3	79.0	82.0	60	98	25	No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	16	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		62.4	53.5	54.6	1.1	78.1	81.2	13	243	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		65.3	71.0	69.9	-1.1	79.8	82.7	10	39	25	No Change

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		55.3	50.4	56.6	6.2	73.9	77.7	31	99	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		54.4	51.1	54.3	3.2	73.4	77.2	44	82	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		46.9	46.9	50.0	3.1	51.3	73.5	34	67	50	Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL		64.8	50.9	58.6	7.7	79.5	82.4	90	35	75	On Target
Students w/ disabilities		56.5	57.9	60.0	2.1	74.6	78.3	74	30	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		53.6	46.9	53.1	6.2	72.9	76.8	48	80	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	2.1	2.3	306	0	19.6	24.5	306	0
High needs	1.5	2.3	261	25	22.1	26.1	261	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	1.3	2.2	225	25	23.4	26.7	225	0
EL and Former EL	1.1	1.0	101	0	27.7	32.7	101	0
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	98	0	34.1	34.7	98	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	16	-	-	-	16	-
Hispanic/Latino	1.2	1.2	246	0	22.9	28.0	246	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	8.0	7.7	39	0	6.0	5.1	39	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	2.7	4.6	303	25	37.2	38.3	303	0
High needs	1.9	3.1	259	25	39.8	39.4	259	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	1.7	3.1	223	25	42.5	41.3	223	0
EL and Former EL	1.1	1.0	101	0	43.2	41.6	101	0
Students w/ disabilities	1.1	1.0	98	0	42.4	45.9	98	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	16	-	-	-	16	-
Hispanic/Latino	1.2	3.3	243	25	40.4	39.9	243	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	12.0	15.4	39	25	22.0	25.6	39	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	1.7	0.0	99	0	44.3	39.4	99	25
High needs	1.1	0.0	82	0	44.6	43.9	82	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	1.3	0.0	67	0	50.0	47.8	67	0
EL and Former EL	0.0	0.0	35	0	44.8	37.1	35	25
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	30	0	45.7	43.3	30	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Hispanic/Latino	2.2	0.0	80	0	49.4	42.5	80	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		46.0	36.0	-10.0	51.0	No	209	25	Below Target
High needs		44.0	36.0	-8.0	51.0	No	172	25	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		44.0	35.5	-8.5	51.0	No	156	25	Below Target
EL and Former EL		49.0	46.0	-3.0	51.0	Yes	65	75	On Target
Students w/ disabilities		33.0	31.0	-2.0	51.0	No	44	25	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	12	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		44.5	35.0	-9.5	51.0	No	170	25	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		59.5	54.5	-5.0	51.0	No	24	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		36.0	38.5	2.5	51.0	No	212	50	Below Target
High needs		36.0	40.5	4.5	51.0	No	176	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		36.0	40.5	4.5	51.0	No	160	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		35.0	51.5	16.5	51.0	No	66	100	Above Target
Students w/ disabilities		37.0	41.5	4.5	51.0	No	46	50	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	12	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		34.0	39.0	5.0	51.0	No	173	50	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		43.0	42.0	-1.0	51.0	No	24	50	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	55.0	60.0	88.00	0
High needs	55.0	60.0	88.00	0
EL and Former EL	55.0	60.0	88.00	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	352	351	100	Yes	352	348	99	Yes	110	110	100	Yes
High needs	304	303	100	Yes	304	301	99	Yes	92	92	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	265	264	100	Yes	265	262	99	Yes	77	77	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	120	120	100	Yes	120	120	100	Yes	38	38	100	Yes
Students w/ disabilities	110	110	100	Yes	110	110	100	Yes	33	33	100	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	4	-	-	-	4	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	17	-	-	-	17	-	-	-	6	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	288	287	100	Yes	288	284	99	Yes	90	90	100	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	41	41	100	Yes	41	41	100	Yes	12	-	-	-

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.