Massachusetts School and District Profiles

E N White Elementary

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - E N White Elementary

Organization Information

District:

Holyoke (01370000)

School type:

Elementary-Middle School

School:

E N White Elementary (01370045)

Grades served:

PK,K,01,02,03,04,05,06,07,08

Region:

Commissioner's Districts

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 3

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		66.0	61.0	61.4	0.4	80.2	83.0	5	255	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		62.6	57.7	56.9	-0.8	78.2	81.3	5	210	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		60.2	60.2	57.8	-2.4	63.5	80.1	5	186	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		45.5	42.9	44.2	1.3	68.2	72.8	2	78	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		48.7	32.0	34.2	2.2	70.1	74.4	4	60	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		61.4	55.1	55.6	0.5	77.5	80.7	4	200	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		82.1	81.5	81.3	-0.2	89.6	91.1	17	44	25	No Change

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		58.7	53.5	48.1	-5.4	75.9	79.4	3	255	0	Declined
High needs		55.2	49.7	43.9	-5.8	73.9	77.6	3	210	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		51.7	51.7	45.4	-6.3	55.7	75.9	2	185	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		46.6	36.0	33.9	-2.1	68.9	73.3	2	79	25	No Change
Students w/ disabilities		36.0	26.7	27.1	0.4	62.7	68.0	1	59	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		53.7	47.6	42.6	-5.0	73.0	76.9	2	200	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		74.6	77.2	69.3	-7.9	85.2	87.3	8	44	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		50.9	62.0	55.5	-6.5	71.4	75.5	26	86	0	Declined
High needs		44.1	57.8	50.7	-7.1	67.4	72.1	35	73	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		59.6	59.6	51.5	-8.1	63.0	79.8	42	67	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		40.9	40.4	33.3	-7.1	65.5	70.5	7	27	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities		30.0	-	-	-	-	65.0	-	20	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		44.2	56.7	47.2	-9.5	67.5	72.1	26	62	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	18	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	1.1	2.7	255	25	28.7	28.6	255	0
High needs	0.5	0.0	210	0	32.4	34.3	210	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	0.5	0.0	186	0	29.0	33.3	186	0
EL and Former EL	0.0	0.0	78	0	48.7	51.3	78	0
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	60	0	67.2	68.3	60	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Hispanic/Latino	0.0	1.0	200	25	34.7	34.5	200	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	6.5	11.4	44	25	8.7	9.1	44	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	9.2	4.7	255	0	46.2	52.5	255	0
High needs	5.4	1.9	210	0	50.7	57.1	210	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	5.7	2.2	185	0	47.9	55.1	185	0
EL and Former EL	1.3	0.0	79	0	70.1	68.4	79	0
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	59	0	86.7	79.7	59	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Hispanic/Latino	4.5	2.5	200	0	54.2	58.5	200	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	32.6	15.9	44	0	15.2	29.5	44	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	4.2	3.5	86	0	30.2	37.2	86	0
High needs	3.8	0.0	73	0	35.0	42.5	73	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	4.3	0.0	67	0	32.9	41.8	67	0
EL and Former EL	0.0	0.0	27	0	53.8	66.7	27	0
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	20	-	-	-	20	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Hispanic/Latino	2.8	1.6	62	0	35.2	46.8	62	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	18	-	-	-	18	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		43.0	41.0	-2.0	51.0	No	197	50	Below Target
High needs		42.0	40.5	-1.5	51.0	No	162	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		42.0	36.5	-5.5	51.0	No	142	25	Below Target
EL and Former EL		45.0	41.0	-4.0	51.0	No	57	50	Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		34.0	33.0	-1.0	51.0	No	50	25	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		41.0	37.0	-4.0	51.0	No	152	25	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		57.0	57.0	0.0	51.0	No	35	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		44.5	32.0	-12.5	51.0	No	199	25	Below Target
High needs		40.5	30.0	-10.5	51.0	No	163	0	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		41.0	30.0	-11.0	51.0	No	143	0	Below Target
EL and Former EL		39.0	32.0	-7.0	51.0	No	58	25	Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		33.0	35.0	2.0	51.0	No	50	50	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		40.0	32.0	-8.0	51.0	No	154	25	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		59.0	30.0	-29.0	51.0	No	36	0	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	25.5	60.0	72.00	0
High needs	25.5	60.0	72.00	0
EL and Former EL	25.5	60.0	72.00	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	287	283	99	Yes	288	284	99	Yes	97	97	100	Yes
High needs	242	238	98	Yes	243	239	98	Yes	84	84	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	214	211	99	Yes	215	211	98	Yes	77	77	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	93	92	99	Yes	94	94	100	Yes	35	35	100	Yes
Students w/ disabilities	65	65	100	Yes	65	64	98	Yes	22	22	100	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	9	-	-	-	9	-	-	-	5	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	228	225	99	Yes	229	226	99	Yes	71	71	100	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	4	-	-	-	4	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	46	45	98	Yes	46	45	98	Yes	19	-	-	-

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.