Massachusetts School and District Profiles

William R. Peck School

Districts
Schools

2016

This organization is currently closed.

2016 Accountability Data - William R. Peck School

Organization Information

District:

Holyoke (01370000)

School type:

Elementary-Middle School

School:

William R. Peck School (01370030)

Grades served:

04,05,06,07,08

Region:

Commissioner's Districts

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 3

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		63.9	54.3	56.0	1.7	78.9	82.0	3	280	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		63.4	52.2	53.6	1.4	78.7	81.7	3	258	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		52.5	52.5	53.5	1.0	56.5	76.3	4	234	50	Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL		51.0	48.5	50.2	1.7	71.4	75.5	5	115	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		55.0	43.8	40.8	-3.0	73.8	77.5	6	109	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		62.5	53.5	54.8	1.3	78.1	81.3	2	253	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	18	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		58.5	50.2	48.7	-1.5	75.8	79.3	4	275	25	No Change
High needs		57.8	48.4	46.6	-1.8	75.4	78.9	4	253	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		49.7	49.7	46.3	-3.4	53.9	74.9	3	230	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		51.3	41.5	44.9	3.4	71.6	75.7	5	113	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		50.8	36.8	35.3	-1.5	71.3	75.4	10	107	25	No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		57.3	49.0	48.6	-0.4	75.1	78.7	4	248	25	No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	18	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		48.9	47.7	37.1	-10.6	70.2	74.5	2	107	0	Declined
High needs		48.9	46.8	36.6	-10.2	70.2	74.5	3	97	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		48.5	48.5	37.9	-10.6	52.8	74.3	4	85	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		51.1	41.9	33.3	-8.6	71.5	75.6	7	42	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities		71.2	40.3	26.1	-14.2	83.2	85.6	2	45	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		48.8	46.3	37.1	-9.2	70.1	74.4	6	99	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	1.0	0.0	280	0	41.8	40.4	280	0
High needs	0.7	0.0	258	0	44.5	43.0	258	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	0.8	0.0	234	0	43.1	42.3	234	0
EL and Former EL	0.0	0.0	115	0	51.1	47.0	115	0
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	109	0	64.2	62.4	109	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Hispanic/Latino	0.4	0.0	253	0	42.6	41.9	253	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	18	-	-	-	18	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	1.7	2.2	275	25	46.7	46.2	275	0
High needs	0.7	1.6	253	25	48.7	48.6	253	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	0.8	1.7	230	25	46.5	48.7	230	0
EL and Former EL	0.0	1.8	113	25	57.4	52.2	113	0
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.9	107	25	67.3	69.2	107	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Hispanic/Latino	1.5	2.0	248	25	47.4	46.0	248	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	18	-	-	-	18	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	0.0	0.0	107	0	49.3	60.7	107	0
High needs	0.0	0.0	97	0	50.8	62.9	97	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	0.0	0.0	85	0	49.1	61.2	85	0
EL and Former EL	0.0	0.0	42	0	60.3	69.0	42	0
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	45	0	61.1	82.2	45	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Hispanic/Latino	0.0	0.0	99	0	50.4	60.6	99	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		35.0	45.0	10.0	51.0	No	231	75	On Target
High needs		33.0	44.5	11.5	51.0	No	210	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		32.0	43.0	11.0	51.0	No	194	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		33.0	53.0	20.0	51.0	No	87	100	Above Target
Students w/ disabilities		30.0	24.0	-6.0	51.0	No	71	0	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		35.5	47.0	11.5	51.0	No	207	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	16	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		36.0	30.0	-6.0	51.0	No	234	0	Below Target
High needs		37.0	27.0	-10.0	51.0	No	213	0	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		37.0	26.5	-10.5	51.0	No	198	0	Below Target
EL and Former EL		34.5	39.0	4.5	51.0	No	89	50	Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		25.0	18.5	-6.5	51.0	No	76	0	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		36.0	34.0	-2.0	51.0	No	211	25	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	16	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	44.5	60.0	70.00	0
High needs	44.5	60.0	70.00	0
EL and Former EL	44.5	60.0	70.00	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	334	324	97	Yes	334	320	96	Yes	130	126	97	Yes
High needs	312	302	97	Yes	312	298	96	Yes	120	116	97	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	284	275	97	Yes	284	272	96	Yes	107	103	96	Yes
EL and Former EL	148	142	96	Yes	148	142	96	Yes	54	54	100	Yes
Students w/ disabilities	139	130	94	No	139	130	94	No	55	52	95	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	4	-	-	-	4	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	305	295	97	Yes	305	291	95	Yes	121	118	98	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	4	-	-	-	4	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	19	-	-	-	19	-	-	-	6	-	-	-

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.