Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Miller School

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Miller School

Organization Information

District:

Holliston (01360000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

Miller School (01360007)

Grades served:

03,04,05

Region:

Greater Boston

Title I status:

Non-Title I School (NT)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		91.9	90.3	90.1	-0.2	95.3	96.0	70	638	25	No Change
High needs		74.1	71.8	73.7	1.9	84.9	87.1	39	167	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		73.1	73.1	81.7	8.6	75.3	86.6	74	41	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		76.2	-	-	-	-	88.1	-	29	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		69.6	66.3	69.5	3.2	82.3	84.8	64	119	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Asian		95.7	94.7	95.2	0.5	97.5	97.9	61	31	100	Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		87.0	79.5	77.1	-2.4	89.2	93.5	69	36	25	No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	16	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		92.0	90.7	90.7	0.0	95.3	96.0	65	551	25	No Change

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		91.3	90.4	89.9	-0.5	94.9	95.7	70	639	25	No Change
High needs		74.6	75.5	75.9	0.4	85.2	87.3	50	167	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		71.9	71.9	79.9	8.0	74.2	86.0	66	41	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		81.8	-	-	-	-	90.9	-	29	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		70.6	71.5	71.4	-0.1	82.9	85.3	69	119	25	No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Asian		97.8	95.5	96.8	1.3	98.7	98.9	61	31	100	Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		70.7	74.3	72.1	-2.2	75.6	85.4	45	35	25	No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	16	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		91.7	91.3	90.8	-0.5	95.2	95.9	67	553	25	No Change

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		91.2	90.6	93.0	2.4	94.9	95.6	93	204	100	Above Target
High needs		75.0	75.9	77.0	1.1	85.4	87.5	80	51	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		71.4	75.0	74.4	-0.6	83.3	85.7	85	44	25	No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		91.1	91.0	93.4	2.4	94.8	95.6	90	171	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	24.1	18.5	638	0	4.5	3.3	638	25
High needs	7.4	3.0	167	0	17.3	12.6	167	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	7.7	9.8	41	25	20.5	4.9	41	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	29	-	-	-	29	-
Students w/ disabilities	4.7	0.8	119	0	22.0	16.0	119	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Asian	24.2	19.4	31	0	3.0	0.0	31	25
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Hispanic/Latino	15.2	13.9	36	0	15.2	11.1	36	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	16	-	-	-	16	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	24.7	18.7	551	0	4.1	3.1	551	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	34.9	38.8	639	25	4.2	3.0	639	25
High needs	13.5	15.6	167	25	14.1	9.6	167	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	12.5	29.3	41	25	20.0	12.2	41	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	29	-	-	-	29	-
Students w/ disabilities	10.2	9.2	119	0	18.0	13.4	119	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Asian	57.6	71.0	31	25	0.0	0.0	31	25
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Hispanic/Latino	8.8	22.9	35	25	20.6	20.0	35	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	16	-	-	-	16	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	35.3	39.1	553	25	3.4	2.0	553	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	28.6	37.3	204	25	3.5	2.0	204	25
High needs	7.4	13.7	51	25	14.8	7.8	51	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Students w/ disabilities	6.8	9.1	44	25	18.2	9.1	44	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	29.2	37.4	171	25	3.0	1.8	171	25

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		45.0	48.0	3.0	51.0	No	407	50	Below Target
High needs		34.5	43.0	8.5	51.0	No	101	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	51.0	-	24	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	12	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		27.0	44.0	17.0	51.0	No	76	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	22	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	23	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		45.0	46.0	1.0	51.0	No	351	50	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		55.5	63.5	8.0	51.0	No	408	100	Above Target
High needs		46.5	51.5	5.0	51.0	No	102	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	51.0	-	25	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	13	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		47.5	49.0	1.5	51.0	No	77	50	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	22	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	23	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		56.0	61.0	5.0	51.0	No	352	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	92.0	60.0	21.00	25
High needs	92.0	60.0	21.00	25
EL and Former EL	92.0	60.0	21.00	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	659	655	99	Yes	659	656	100	Yes	210	208	99	Yes
High needs	176	174	99	Yes	176	174	99	Yes	54	53	98	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	47	47	100	Yes	47	47	100	Yes	12	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	34	34	100	Yes	34	34	100	Yes	8	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	124	122	98	Yes	124	122	98	Yes	45	44	98	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Asian	36	36	100	Yes	36	36	100	Yes	14	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	40	40	100	Yes	40	39	98	Yes	13	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	16	-	-	-	16	-	-	-	6	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	563	559	99	Yes	563	561	100	Yes	175	173	99	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.