Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Holland Elementary

View selected organization
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Holland Elementary

Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 84.7, Target = 90.1 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 84.7, Target = 90.1 75 or Higher All Students 83.1 80.4 84.7 4.3 90.1 91.6 4612450Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 80.7, Target = 86.8 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 80.7, Target = 86.8 75 or Higher High needs 77.4 68.9 80.7 11.8 86.8 88.7 734450Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 87.5, Target = 79.1 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-CPI = 87.5, Target = 79.1CPI = 87.5, Target = 79.175 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 77.2 77.2 87.5 10.3 79.1 88.6 9328100Above Target
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------23--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 85.5, Target = 90.1 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 85.5, Target = 90.1 75 or Higher White 83.0 80.9 85.5 4.6 90.1 91.5 3511750Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 86.7, Target = 90 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 86.7, Target = 90 75 or Higher All Students 82.9 84.6 86.7 2.1 90.0 91.5 5412450Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 84.1, Target = 87.7 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 84.1, Target = 87.7 75 or Higher High needs 78.9 79.0 84.1 5.1 87.7 89.5 834450Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 86.6, Target = 86.5 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-CPI = 86.6, Target = 86.575 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 85.3 85.3 86.6 1.3 86.5 92.7 892875On Target
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------23--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 87.4, Target = 89.9 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 87.4, Target = 89.9 75 or Higher White 82.7 85.1 87.4 2.3 89.9 91.4 4611750Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 80.6, Target = 92 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 80.6, Target = 92 75 or Higher All Students 86.2 74.1 80.6 6.5 92.0 93.1 493650Improved Below Target
High needs -------16--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------10--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 80.1, Target = 91.6 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 80.1, Target = 91.6 75 or Higher White 85.6 75.0 80.1 5.1 91.6 92.8 283450Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 5.6 16.112425 8.9 4.012425
High needs 4.1 6.84425 20.4 4.54425
Econ. Disadvantaged 5.9 10.72825 11.8 3.62825
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--23---23-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 6.1 17.111725 8.7 3.411725
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 20.8 33.112425 5.6 4.812425
High needs 6.0 18.24425 8.0 6.84425
Econ. Disadvantaged 8.8 28.62825 2.9 7.1280
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--23---23-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 21.6 35.011725 4.3 5.11170
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 6.9 19.43625 3.4 13.9360
High needs--16---16-
Econ. Disadvantaged--10---10-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--8---8-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 7.1 20.63425 3.6 14.7340
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 57.5, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 57.5, Target = 51SGP = 57.5, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 48.0 57.5 9.5 51.0Yes8875On Target
High needsSGP = 60.5, Target = 51 - High needsHigh needs-SGP = 60.5, Target = 51SGP = 60.5, Target = 5175 or Higher High needs 38.0 60.5 22.5 51.0Yes32100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-20--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 58, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 5175 or Higher White 49.0 58.0 9.0 51.0Yes8475On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 65, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 59.5 65.0 5.5 51.0Yes89100Above Target
High needsSGP = 65, Target = 51 - High needsHigh needs-SGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 5175 or Higher High needs 51.5 65.0 13.5 51.0Yes33100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-20--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 63, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 5175 or Higher White 61.0 63.0 2.0 51.0Yes85100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students124124100Yes124124100Yes3636100Yes
High needs4444100Yes4444100Yes16---
Econ. Disadvantaged2828100Yes2828100Yes10---
EL and Former EL------------
Students w/ disabilities23---23---8---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1-------
Asian1---1---1---
Afr. Amer./Black3---3---1---
Hispanic/Latino2---2-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.------------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White117117100Yes117117100Yes3434100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.


School and District Profiles