Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Pentucket Lake Elementary
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Pentucket Lake Elementary
Organization Information
District:Haverhill (01280000)School type:Elementary School
School:Pentucket Lake Elementary (01280054)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 77.3, Target = 83.3CPI = 77.3, Target = 83.3CPI = 77.3, Target = 83.3 71.3 79.7 77.3 -2.4 83.3 85.7 2125825No Change
High needsCPI = 72.9, Target = 78.2CPI = 72.9, Target = 78.2CPI = 72.9, Target = 78.2 62.7 73.9 72.9 -1.0 78.2 81.4 3617025No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 73.5, Target = 79.5CPI = 73.5, Target = 79.5CPI = 73.5, Target = 79.5 77.6 77.6 73.5 -4.1 79.5 88.8 331320Declined
EL and Former EL -------22--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 63.9, Target = 71.7CPI = 63.9, Target = 71.7CPI = 63.9, Target = 71.7 51.5 54.3 63.9 9.6 71.7 75.8 477050Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black -------8--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 71.3, Target = 79.6CPI = 71.3, Target = 79.6CPI = 71.3, Target = 79.6 65.0 78.8 71.3 -7.5 79.6 82.5 46610Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------2--
WhiteCPI = 79.3, Target = 85.2CPI = 79.3, Target = 85.2CPI = 79.3, Target = 85.2 74.7 79.7 79.3 -0.4 85.2 87.4 1317925No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 75.9, Target = 82.8CPI = 75.9, Target = 82.8CPI = 75.9, Target = 82.8 70.5 73.2 75.9 2.7 82.8 85.3 1725850Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 71.8, Target = 78.4CPI = 71.8, Target = 78.4CPI = 71.8, Target = 78.4 63.0 67.0 71.8 4.8 78.4 81.5 3217050Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 72.7, Target = 71.8CPI = 72.7, Target = 71.8 69.2 69.2 72.7 3.5 71.8 84.6 3413275On Target
EL and Former EL -------22--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 60.4, Target = 69.7CPI = 60.4, Target = 69.7CPI = 60.4, Target = 69.7 48.1 49.5 60.4 10.9 69.7 74.1 377050Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black -------8--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 70.5, Target = 77.7CPI = 70.5, Target = 77.7CPI = 70.5, Target = 77.7 61.7 69.8 70.5 0.7 77.7 80.9 386150Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------2--
WhiteCPI = 77.1, Target = 85CPI = 77.1, Target = 85CPI = 77.1, Target = 85 74.3 74.3 77.1 2.8 85.0 87.2 1017950Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All students ----------
High needs ----------
Econ. Disadvantaged ----------
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities ----------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White ----------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 5.0 8.525825 9.0 12.02580
High needs 1.5 4.717025 14.3 15.31700
Econ. Disadvantaged 1.9 6.113225 10.4 15.91320
EL and Former EL--22---22-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 2.97025 30.4 25.77025
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--8---8-
Hispanic/Latino 1.7 4.96125 10.0 14.8610
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--2---2-
White 6.8 10.617925 8.8 11.21790
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 12.9 17.825825 14.7 16.32580
High needs 11.1 11.81700 21.5 20.61700
Econ. Disadvantaged 13.0 14.413225 17.6 19.71320
EL and Former EL--22---22-
Students w/ disabilities 2.1 2.97025 45.8 32.97025
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--8---8-
Hispanic/Latino 14.5 9.8610 21.0 14.86125
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--2---2-
White 12.2 20.717925 12.2 16.81790
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students--------
High needs--------
Econ. Disadvantaged--------
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51 61.5 42.0 -19.5 51.0No10950Below Target
High needsSGP = 37.5, Target = 51SGP = 37.5, Target = 51SGP = 37.5, Target = 51 51.0 37.5 -13.5 51.0No7225Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 31, Target = 51SGP = 31, Target = 51SGP = 31, Target = 51 51.0 31.0 -20.0 51.0No5625Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-10--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-32--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-5--
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 29, Target = 51SGP = 29, Target = 51SGP = 29, Target = 51 55.5 29.0 -26.5 51.0No280Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51 64.5 44.0 -20.5 51.0No7350Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51 29.0 34.0 5.0 51.0Yes11075On Target
High needsSGP = 31, Target = 51SGP = 31, Target = 51SGP = 31, Target = 51 27.0 31.0 4.0 51.0Yes7375On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 31, Target = 51SGP = 31, Target = 51SGP = 31, Target = 51 26.5 31.0 4.5 51.0Yes5775On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-11--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-33--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-5--
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 35, Target = 51SGP = 35, Target = 51SGP = 35, Target = 51 25.0 35.0 10.0 51.0No2975On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 31, Target = 51SGP = 31, Target = 51SGP = 31, Target = 51 29.0 31.0 2.0 51.0Yes7375On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 73.5 60.04225
High needs 73.5 60.04225
EL and Former EL- 60.042-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students277277100Yes277277100Yes----
High needs185185100Yes185185100Yes----
Econ. Disadvantaged145145100Yes145145100Yes----
EL and Former EL26---26-------
Students w/ disabilities7575100Yes7575100Yes----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian5---5-------
Afr. Amer./Black8---8-------
Hispanic/Latino7070100Yes7070100Yes----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.3---3-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.2---2-------
White188188100Yes188188100Yes----

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles