Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Caleb Dustin Hunking

Districts
Schools

2016

This organization is currently closed.

2016 Accountability Data - Caleb Dustin Hunking

Organization Information

District:

Haverhill (01280000)

School type:

Middle School

School:

Caleb Dustin Hunking (01280035)

Grades served:

06,07,08

Region:

Northeast

Title I status:

Non-Title I School (NT)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		85.6	87.8	86.1	-1.7	91.6	92.8	31	357	25	No Change
High needs		76.1	75.9	74.5	-1.4	86.1	88.1	23	154	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		77.5	77.5	79.6	2.1	79.4	88.8	31	103	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		69.1	66.8	64.8	-2.0	82.0	84.6	37	76	25	No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		79.1	76.5	75.5	-1.0	87.8	89.6	29	55	25	No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		86.7	89.8	87.9	-1.9	92.2	93.4	26	285	25	No Change

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		74.1	80.5	80.5	0.0	84.9	87.1	54	361	25	No Change
High needs		62.6	63.0	65.4	2.4	78.2	81.3	61	156	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		68.0	68.0	71.9	3.9	70.7	84.0	66	106	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		56.6	52.7	51.6	-1.1	74.7	78.3	54	76	25	No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		67.8	67.3	64.1	-3.2	81.2	83.9	44	55	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		75.1	82.8	83.7	0.9	85.5	87.6	56	289	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		74.5	74.4	76.2	1.8	85.1	87.3	54	121	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		66.0	58.8	65.3	6.5	80.2	83.0	73	49	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		63.2	63.2	72.5	9.3	66.3	81.6	86	30	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		61.5	44.8	51.9	7.1	77.5	80.8	52	26	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	16	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		75.4	76.9	77.7	0.8	85.7	87.7	47	101	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	9.2	10.4	357	25	5.1	7.6	357	0
High needs	2.0	5.2	154	25	11.6	16.2	154	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	3.3	6.8	103	25	10.0	12.6	103	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	14	-	-	-	14	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	1.3	76	25	17.6	22.4	76	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Hispanic/Latino	4.0	7.3	55	25	10.0	10.9	55	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	10.4	11.2	285	0	4.4	7.4	285	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	29.2	31.6	361	0	13.2	15.5	361	0
High needs	10.6	10.3	156	0	29.6	32.1	156	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	15.1	13.2	106	0	20.9	21.7	106	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	14	-	-	-	14	-
Students w/ disabilities	1.2	2.6	76	25	42.7	52.6	76	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Hispanic/Latino	14.3	12.7	55	0	24.5	30.9	55	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	32.4	35.3	289	0	11.1	12.5	289	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	1.5	4.1	121	25	13.2	10.7	121	25
High needs	0.0	4.1	49	25	31.4	20.4	49	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	0.0	6.7	30	25	20.6	13.3	30	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	26	0	55.2	34.6	26	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	16	-	-	-	16	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	1.9	4.0	101	25	12.0	8.9	101	25

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		32.0	23.0	-9.0	51.0	No	344	0	Below Target
High needs		29.0	23.0	-6.0	51.0	No	143	0	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		29.0	26.0	-3.0	51.0	Yes	98	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	13	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		25.0	19.0	-6.0	51.0	No	67	0	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	11	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		25.0	21.0	-4.0	51.0	No	54	0	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		33.0	23.0	-10.0	51.0	No	274	0	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		57.0	53.0	-4.0	51.0	No	346	75	On Target
High needs		44.0	42.5	-1.5	51.0	Yes	144	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		54.0	46.0	-8.0	51.0	Yes	100	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	14	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		35.5	32.0	-3.5	51.0	Yes	67	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	10	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		57.0	50.0	-7.0	51.0	No	55	50	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		57.0	53.0	-4.0	51.0	Yes	276	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	7.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	7.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	7.00	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	394	373	95	Yes	394	377	96	Yes	130	127	98	Yes
High needs	174	167	96	Yes	174	169	97	Yes	57	55	96	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	118	112	95	Yes	118	115	97	Yes	37	35	95	Yes
EL and Former EL	16	-	-	-	16	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	85	82	96	Yes	85	83	98	Yes	30	30	100	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	5	-	-	-	5	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	13	-	-	-	13	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	62	60	97	Yes	62	61	98	Yes	18	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	313	295	97	Yes	313	298	95	Yes	108	105	97	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.