Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Cedar Elementary
District not selectedDistricts School selectedSchools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Cedar Elementary
Organization Information
District:Hanover (01220000)School type:Elementary School
School:Cedar Elementary (01220004)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 89.3, Target = 94.5 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 89.3, Target = 94.5 75 or Higher All Students 90.5 91.0 89.3 -1.7 94.5 95.3 6717125No Change
High needsCPI = 75.4, Target = 86 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 75.4, Target = 86 75 or Higher High needs 76.0 81.7 75.4 -6.3 86.0 88.0 47560Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------14--
EL and Former EL -------10--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 73.2, Target = 84.1 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 73.2, Target = 84.1 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 72.8 77.2 73.2 -4.0 84.1 86.4 73410Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 90.3, Target = 94.8 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 90.3, Target = 94.8 75 or Higher White 91.0 91.3 90.3 -1.0 94.8 95.5 6315825No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 93.7, Target = 91.8 - All StudentsAll Students-CPI = 93.7, Target = 91.8CPI = 93.7, Target = 91.875 or Higher All Students 86.0 93.5 93.7 0.2 91.8 93.0 88171100Above Target
High needsCPI = 84.2, Target = 80.6 - High needsHigh needs-CPI = 84.2, Target = 80.6CPI = 84.2, Target = 80.675 or Higher High needs 66.8 86.4 84.2 -2.2 80.6 83.4 8457100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------14--
EL and Former EL -------10--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 81, Target = 79.2 - Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities-CPI = 81, Target = 79.2CPI = 81, Target = 79.275 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 64.4 82.6 81.0 -1.6 79.2 82.2 9042100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 94, Target = 92.1 - WhiteWhite-CPI = 94, Target = 92.1CPI = 94, Target = 92.175 or Higher White 86.4 93.5 94.0 0.5 92.1 93.2 85158100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All students ----------
High needs ----------
Econ. Disadvantaged ----------
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities ----------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White ----------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 10.5 8.81710 1.3 4.71710
High needs 2.2 3.65625 4.4 10.7560
Econ. Disadvantaged--14---14-
EL and Former EL--10---10-
Students w/ disabilities 2.9 2.4410 5.9 9.8410
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 11.1 8.91580 1.4 3.81580
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 39.7 42.11710 0.7 2.31710
High needs 27.3 19.3570 2.3 7.0570
Econ. Disadvantaged--14---14-
EL and Former EL--10---10-
Students w/ disabilities 24.2 9.5420 3.0 9.5420
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 41.3 43.01580 0.7 1.91580
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students--------
High needs--------
Econ. Disadvantaged--------
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 46, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 46, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 44.0 46.0 2.0 51.0No8350Below Target
High needsSGP = 41.5, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 41.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 52.0 41.5 -10.5 51.0No2450Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-4--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-5--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 46.5, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 46.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 44.0 46.5 2.5 51.0No7850Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 54, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 55.5 54.0 -1.5 51.0No8475On Target
High needsSGP = 44, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 44, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 66.0 44.0 -22.0 51.0Yes2575On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-4--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-5--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 54, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 5175 or Higher White 56.5 54.0 -2.5 51.0No7975On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.07.00-
High needs- 60.07.00-
EL and Former EL- 60.07.00-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students17617197Yes17617298Yes----
High needs605593No605795Yes----
Econ. Disadvantaged14---14-------
EL and Former EL10---10-------
Students w/ disabilities454193No454293No----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian5---5-------
Afr. Amer./Black5---5-------
Hispanic/Latino3---3-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.------------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White16315998Yes16315998Yes----

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles