Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Plum Cove School
District not selectedDistricts School selectedSchools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Plum Cove School
Organization Information
District:Gloucester (01070000)School type:Elementary School
School:Plum Cove School (01070042)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 89.2, Target = 92.2 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 89.2, Target = 92.2 75 or Higher All Students 86.6 90.7 89.2 -1.5 92.2 93.3 679525No Change
High needsCPI = 87.5, Target = 84.2 - High needsHigh needs-CPI = 87.5, Target = 84.2CPI = 87.5, Target = 84.275 or Higher High needs 72.9 83.1 87.5 4.4 84.2 86.5 9438100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 93.8, Target = 89.5 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-CPI = 93.8, Target = 89.5CPI = 93.8, Target = 89.575 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 88.5 88.5 93.8 5.3 89.5 94.3 9928100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------2--
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 89.6, Target = 92.3 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 89.6, Target = 92.3 75 or Higher White 86.8 91.0 89.6 -1.4 92.3 93.4 598925No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 92.1, Target = 91.5 - All StudentsAll Students-CPI = 92.1, Target = 91.575 or Higher All Students 85.4 90.9 92.1 1.2 91.5 92.7 809575On Target
High needsCPI = 88.2, Target = 84.2 - High needsHigh needs-CPI = 88.2, Target = 84.2CPI = 88.2, Target = 84.275 or Higher High needs 72.9 83.1 88.2 5.1 84.2 86.5 9438100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 90.2, Target = 92.9 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 90.2, Target = 92.9 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 92.3 92.3 90.2 -2.1 92.9 96.2 962875On Target
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------2--
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 91.6, Target = 91.4 - WhiteWhite-CPI = 91.6, Target = 91.475 or Higher White 85.3 91.2 91.6 0.4 91.4 92.7 738975On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 88.9, Target = 94.3 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 88.9, Target = 94.3 75 or Higher All Students 90.3 92.6 88.9 -3.7 94.3 95.2 79270Declined
High needs -------9--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------5--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------5--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 88.5, Target = 94.3 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 88.5, Target = 94.3 75 or Higher White 90.3 92.4 88.5 -3.9 94.3 95.2 67260Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 23.6 16.8950 0.9 5.3950
High needs 16.2 10.5380 2.7 5.3380
Econ. Disadvantaged 23.1 14.3280 3.8 3.6280
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--13---13-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--2---2-
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--1---1-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 23.8 14.6890 0.0 5.6890
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 38.2 41.1950 4.5 4.2950
High needs 21.6 44.73825 13.5 5.33825
Econ. Disadvantaged 30.8 50.02825 7.7 3.62825
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--13---13-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--2---2-
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--1---1-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 39.0 41.6890 3.8 4.5890
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 25.5 22.2270 4.3 3.72725
High needs--9---9-
Econ. Disadvantaged--5---5-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--5---5-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 26.1 23.1260 4.3 3.82625
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 61, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 75.0 61.0 -14.0 51.0No57100Above Target
High needs --- 51.0-18--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-14--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-6--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 57, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 5175 or Higher White 77.0 57.0 -20.0 51.0No5575On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 59, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 71.0 59.0 -12.0 51.0No5775On Target
High needs --- 51.0-18--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-14--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-6--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 59, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 5175 or Higher White 71.5 59.0 -12.5 51.0No5575On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.01.00-
High needs- 60.01.00-
EL and Former EL- 60.01.00-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students9595100Yes9696100Yes2727100Yes
High needs3838100Yes3838100Yes9---
Econ. Disadvantaged2828100Yes2828100Yes5---
EL and Former EL2---2-------
Students w/ disabilities13---13---5---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.2---2-------
Asian1---1---1---
Afr. Amer./Black1---1-------
Hispanic/Latino1---1-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.1---1-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White8989100Yes8989100Yes2626100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles