Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Penn Brook
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Penn Brook
Organization Information
District:Georgetown (01050000)School type:Elementary School
School:Penn Brook (01050010)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05,06
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 3
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 87, Target = 92.8CPI = 87, Target = 92.8CPI = 87, Target = 92.8 87.7 83.5 87.0 3.5 92.8 93.9 5741250Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 67.2, Target = 78.8CPI = 67.2, Target = 78.8CPI = 67.2, Target = 78.8 63.6 59.0 67.2 8.2 78.8 81.8 169050Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 79.9, Target = 78.8CPI = 79.9, Target = 78.8CPI = 79.9, Target = 78.8 76.9 76.9 79.9 3.0 78.8 88.5 654175On Target
EL and Former EL -------4--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 57.8, Target = 72.4CPI = 57.8, Target = 72.4CPI = 57.8, Target = 72.4 52.7 50.0 57.8 7.8 72.4 76.4 305850Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------6--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 87.3, Target = 92.8CPI = 87.3, Target = 92.8CPI = 87.3, Target = 92.8 87.6 83.9 87.3 3.4 92.8 93.8 4639350Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 86.3, Target = 91.8CPI = 86.3, Target = 91.8CPI = 86.3, Target = 91.8 86.0 83.2 86.3 3.1 91.8 93.0 5341150Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 62.9, Target = 74.6CPI = 62.9, Target = 74.6CPI = 62.9, Target = 74.6 56.4 57.5 62.9 5.4 74.6 78.2 98950Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 73.8, Target = 74.5CPI = 73.8, Target = 74.5 72.2 72.2 73.8 1.6 74.5 86.1 404175On Target
EL and Former EL -------4--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 53.5, Target = 69.6CPI = 53.5, Target = 69.6CPI = 53.5, Target = 69.6 47.8 48.3 53.5 5.2 69.6 73.9 195750Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------6--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 86.8, Target = 91.8CPI = 86.8, Target = 91.8CPI = 86.8, Target = 91.8 86.0 83.8 86.8 3.0 91.8 93.0 4239250Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 85.8, Target = 88.9CPI = 85.8, Target = 88.9CPI = 85.8, Target = 88.9 81.0 81.1 85.8 4.7 88.9 90.5 6710950Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 69.6, Target = 74.7CPI = 69.6, Target = 74.7CPI = 69.6, Target = 74.7 56.7 63.3 69.6 6.3 74.7 78.4 562350Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------13--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 87.1, Target = 88.9CPI = 87.1, Target = 88.9CPI = 87.1, Target = 88.9 81.0 80.6 87.1 6.5 88.9 90.5 6110350Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 14.4 11.24120 10.2 5.141225
High needs 4.5 1.1900 35.8 21.19025
Econ. Disadvantaged 7.4 2.4410 7.4 9.8410
EL and Former EL--4---4-
Students w/ disabilities 2.3 0.0580 47.7 29.35825
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--6---6-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 14.0 11.23930 9.7 4.639325
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 26.8 34.841125 10.9 6.841125
High needs 7.5 5.6890 38.8 25.88925
Econ. Disadvantaged 11.1 9.8410 18.5 12.24125
EL and Former EL--4---4-
Students w/ disabilities 4.5 1.8570 52.3 36.85725
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--6---6-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 27.1 35.539225 10.0 6.139225
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 18.0 21.110925 6.3 4.610925
High needs 0.0 17.42325 23.3 17.42325
Econ. Disadvantaged--13---13-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--13---13-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--1---1-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 17.8 22.310325 6.5 2.910325
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51 45.5 49.0 3.5 51.0No31250Below Target
High needsSGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51 35.0 47.0 12.0 51.0No6475On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-33--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-3--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51 30.0 48.0 18.0 51.0No39100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-3--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51 45.5 49.0 3.5 51.0No29950Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 68, Target = 51SGP = 68, Target = 51SGP = 68, Target = 51 50.5 68.0 17.5 51.0Yes313100Above Target
High needsSGP = 67, Target = 51SGP = 67, Target = 51SGP = 67, Target = 51 47.5 67.0 19.5 51.0No65100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-33--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-3--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 69.5, Target = 51SGP = 69.5, Target = 51SGP = 69.5, Target = 51 47.0 69.5 22.5 51.0No40100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-4--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 69, Target = 51SGP = 69, Target = 51SGP = 69, Target = 51 49.0 69.0 20.0 51.0Yes299100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.04-
High needs- 60.04-
EL and Former EL- 60.04-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students41941699Yes41941599Yes11010999Yes
High needs939299Yes939198Yes2323100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged444398Yes444398Yes13---
EL and Former EL4---4---2---
Students w/ disabilities5858100Yes585798Yes13---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian6---6---2---
Afr. Amer./Black7---7---2---
Hispanic/Latino5---5---1---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.2---2---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.1---1-------
White39839599Yes39839499Yes10410399Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles