Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Gardner Middle School

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Gardner Middle School

Organization Information

District:

Gardner (01030000)

School type:

Middle School

School:

Gardner Middle School (01030405)

Grades served:

05,06,07

Region:

Central

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 3

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		87.0	77.4	71.3	-6.1	92.4	93.5	6	510	0	Declined
High needs		79.8	66.4	61.5	-4.9	88.2	89.9	4	300	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		67.8	67.8	61.4	-6.4	70.5	83.9	3	247	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		76.1	68.3	56.6	-11.7	86.1	88.1	11	34	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities		61.0	48.8	46.4	-2.4	77.3	80.5	5	112	25	No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		79.3	69.0	63.2	-5.8	87.9	89.7	6	74	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		66.7	-	-	-	-	83.4	-	46	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		87.6	78.7	73.7	-5.0	92.8	93.8	2	372	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		70.2	63.5	63.0	-0.5	82.6	85.1	12	509	25	No Change
High needs		59.9	50.9	50.8	-0.1	76.6	80.0	6	299	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		51.6	51.6	51.2	-0.4	55.6	75.8	5	246	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		57.1	49.2	50.7	1.5	75.0	78.6	36	34	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		40.4	35.9	34.6	-1.3	65.2	70.2	8	112	25	No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		59.4	48.9	55.8	6.9	76.3	79.7	18	73	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		55.2	-	-	-	-	77.6	-	46	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		70.6	65.8	65.4	-0.4	82.9	85.3	6	372	25	No Change

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		71.6	56.6	70.8	14.2	83.4	85.8	36	148	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		63.6	49.2	63.2	14.0	78.8	81.8	60	89	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		50.0	50.0	64.6	14.6	54.2	75.0	59	70	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		47.6	38.5	50.0	11.5	69.4	73.8	41	39	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		41.7	43.0	65.2	22.2	66.0	70.9	81	23	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	17	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		73.5	59.1	73.8	14.7	84.5	86.8	30	104	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	4.6	3.1	510	0	14.3	19.8	510	0
High needs	2.1	1.0	300	0	24.5	29.0	300	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	2.1	1.2	247	0	23.7	28.3	247	0
EL and Former EL	6.7	0.0	34	0	26.7	41.2	34	0
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	112	0	44.0	47.3	112	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Hispanic/Latino	6.0	2.7	74	0	23.9	27.0	74	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	46	-	-	-	46	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	4.8	3.5	372	0	13.1	17.5	372	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	8.6	10.2	509	25	29.3	28.5	509	0
High needs	3.2	4.0	299	25	42.6	43.8	299	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	2.6	4.1	246	25	40.2	43.1	246	0
EL and Former EL	6.7	5.9	34	0	50.0	50.0	34	0
Students w/ disabilities	1.0	0.0	112	0	67.7	67.9	112	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Hispanic/Latino	5.9	5.5	73	0	47.1	39.7	73	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	46	-	-	-	46	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	9.6	11.8	372	25	26.6	24.7	372	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	0.6	8.8	148	25	29.4	14.2	148	25
High needs	0.0	3.4	89	25	39.6	20.2	89	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	0.0	2.9	70	25	37.2	18.6	70	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	39	0	69.2	33.3	39	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Hispanic/Latino	0.0	8.7	23	25	56.0	17.4	23	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	17	-	-	-	17	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	0.8	9.6	104	25	25.6	11.5	104	25

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		30.0	23.0	-7.0	51.0	No	489	0	Below Target
High needs		29.0	23.0	-6.0	51.0	No	286	0	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		29.0	22.0	-7.0	51.0	No	238	0	Below Target
EL and Former EL		30.0	26.5	-3.5	51.0	No	30	0	Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		23.0	33.5	10.5	51.0	No	104	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		25.5	18.0	-7.5	51.0	No	69	0	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	44	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		31.0	23.0	-8.0	51.0	No	359	0	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		40.0	33.0	-7.0	51.0	No	487	25	Below Target
High needs		37.0	31.0	-6.0	51.0	No	285	25	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		36.5	31.0	-5.5	51.0	No	238	25	Below Target
EL and Former EL		33.0	37.5	4.5	51.0	No	30	50	Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		32.5	33.0	0.5	51.0	No	103	50	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		43.0	30.5	-12.5	51.0	Yes	68	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	43	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		39.0	33.0	-6.0	51.0	No	359	25	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	17.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	17.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	17.00	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	532	528	99	Yes	532	527	99	Yes	158	154	97	Yes
High needs	317	314	99	Yes	317	313	99	Yes	97	94	97	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	262	260	99	Yes	262	259	99	Yes	76	74	97	Yes
EL and Former EL	38	36	95	Yes	38	36	95	Yes	14	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	119	116	97	Yes	119	116	97	Yes	42	40	95	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	9	-	-	-	9	-	-	-	3	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	10	-	-	-	10	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	79	78	99	Yes	79	77	97	Yes	26	25	96	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	47	46	98	Yes	47	46	98	Yes	19	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	386	385	100	Yes	386	385	100	Yes	109	108	99	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.