Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Gardner Elementary School

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Elm Street School

Organization Information

District:

Gardner (01030000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

Elm Street School (01030001)

Grades served:

02,03,04

Region:

Central

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 3

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		79.4	71.7	68.0	-3.7	88.0	89.7	7	398	0	Declined
High needs		73.2	64.4	62.3	-2.1	84.4	86.6	7	272	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		66.2	66.2	63.9	-2.3	69.0	83.1	9	228	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		64.2	59.0	62.9	3.9	79.1	82.1	25	29	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		59.2	49.8	43.9	-5.9	76.2	79.6	6	99	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		68.6	62.1	62.3	0.2	81.7	84.3	13	61	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		63.0	68.1	62.8	-5.3	72.3	81.5	14	41	0	Declined
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		81.6	73.8	70.4	-3.4	89.3	90.8	3	281	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		73.4	69.4	68.3	-1.1	84.5	86.7	8	398	25	No Change
High needs		67.3	60.6	62.7	2.1	80.9	83.7	8	272	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		62.9	62.9	63.4	0.5	66.0	81.5	9	228	50	Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL		62.5	60.3	64.7	4.4	78.1	81.3	21	29	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		55.4	44.9	45.5	0.6	74.0	77.7	9	99	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		62.3	58.6	64.8	6.2	78.0	81.2	20	61	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		68.0	59.0	58.5	-0.5	76.0	84.0	10	41	25	No Change
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		75.4	72.6	70.7	-1.9	85.7	87.7	5	281	25	No Change

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	4.8	2.3	398	0	18.4	20.6	398	0
High needs	1.0	1.8	272	25	26.4	27.6	272	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	0.8	1.3	228	25	24.9	25.9	228	0
EL and Former EL	0.0	0.0	29	0	35.9	24.1	29	25
Students w/ disabilities	0.8	2.0	99	25	45.3	55.6	99	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Hispanic/Latino	0.0	0.0	61	0	29.3	23.0	61	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	2.1	0.0	41	0	19.1	17.1	41	25
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	5.8	2.8	281	0	16.1	20.3	281	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	12.2	8.0	398	0	20.7	21.4	398	0
High needs	6.3	5.9	272	0	30.4	28.7	272	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	5.8	6.1	228	0	28.2	27.2	228	0
EL and Former EL	7.7	3.4	29	0	30.8	37.9	29	0
Students w/ disabilities	3.9	4.0	99	0	53.1	54.5	99	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Hispanic/Latino	5.2	0.0	61	0	31.0	27.9	61	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	8.5	0.0	41	0	34.0	34.1	41	0
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	14.2	11.0	281	0	16.9	17.4	281	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		34.5	43.0	8.5	51.0	No	193	50	Below Target
High needs		31.0	46.0	15.0	51.0	No	126	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		31.0	47.0	16.0	51.0	No	105	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	16	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		25.0	31.0	6.0	51.0	No	45	50	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		48.0	31.0	-17.0	51.0	No	25	25	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	19	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		34.0	43.0	9.0	51.0	No	141	50	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		44.0	36.5	-7.5	51.0	No	192	25	Below Target
High needs		38.0	35.0	-3.0	51.0	No	125	25	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		39.5	34.0	-5.5	51.0	No	104	25	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	16	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		26.0	38.0	12.0	51.0	No	44	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		41.0	33.0	-8.0	51.0	Yes	24	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	19	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		47.0	38.0	-9.0	51.0	No	141	25	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	85.0	60.0	34.00	25
High needs	85.0	60.0	34.00	25
EL and Former EL	85.0	60.0	34.00	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	419	415	99	Yes	419	415	99	Yes	-	-	-	-
High needs	290	287	99	Yes	290	287	99	Yes	-	-	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	243	241	99	Yes	243	241	99	Yes	-	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	31	31	100	Yes	31	31	100	Yes	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	108	106	98	Yes	108	106	98	Yes	-	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	6	-	-	-	6	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	11	-	-	-	11	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	65	65	100	Yes	65	65	100	Yes	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	43	42	98	Yes	43	42	98	Yes	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	294	291	99	Yes	294	291	99	Yes	-	-	-	-

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.