Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Horace Mann

Districts
Schools

2016

This organization is currently closed.

2016 Accountability Data - Horace Mann

Organization Information

District:

Franklin (01010000)

School type:

Middle School

School:

Horace Mann (01010405)

Grades served:

06,07,08

Region:

Greater Boston

Title I status:

Non-Title I School (NT)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		96.2	92.6	93.2	0.6	97.8	98.1	66	449	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		85.8	80.4	79.5	-0.9	91.7	92.9	43	100	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		87.9	87.9	77.3	-10.6	88.9	94.0	21	32	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		83.5	74.0	77.0	3.0	90.4	91.8	74	75	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Asian		95.5	99.0	99.2	0.2	97.4	97.8	88	30	100	Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		96.2	92.2	93.0	0.8	97.8	98.1	56	399	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		89.8	83.7	85.1	1.4	94.1	94.9	71	447	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		68.4	62.6	63.4	0.8	81.6	84.2	52	99	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		75.0	75.0	62.5	-12.5	77.1	87.5	28	32	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		64.2	54.9	58.8	3.9	79.1	82.1	77	74	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Asian		94.3	95.2	99.2	4.0	96.7	97.2	97	30	100	Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		89.4	82.9	84.0	1.1	93.8	94.7	59	397	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		88.9	84.8	80.9	-3.9	93.5	94.5	74	144	0	Declined
High needs		70.5	67.1	59.9	-7.2	82.8	85.3	45	38	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		66.1	57.0	57.8	0.8	80.2	83.1	72	32	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		88.5	84.3	80.2	-4.1	93.3	94.3	63	131	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	12.2	17.6	449	25	2.3	2.9	449	0
High needs	2.8	2.0	100	0	8.5	11.0	100	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	2.9	3.1	32	0	8.6	12.5	32	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Students w/ disabilities	2.6	1.3	75	0	11.7	14.7	75	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Asian	38.5	46.7	30	25	0.0	0.0	30	25
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	9.6	15.0	399	25	2.3	2.5	399	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	29.0	32.0	447	25	9.6	8.7	447	0
High needs	10.9	7.1	99	0	29.7	26.3	99	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	21.2	9.4	32	0	15.2	34.4	32	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Students w/ disabilities	4.2	5.4	74	25	37.5	29.7	74	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Asian	73.1	76.7	30	0	3.8	0.0	30	25
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	25.1	28.7	397	25	9.8	8.8	397	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	0.7	9.0	144	25	4.8	8.3	144	0
High needs	0.0	10.5	38	25	15.8	26.3	38	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	9.4	32	25	24.0	31.3	32	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	0.8	9.2	131	25	3.9	8.4	131	0

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		29.0	30.0	1.0	51.0	Yes	444	75	On Target
High needs		33.0	30.0	-3.0	51.0	No	99	0	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		30.0	23.5	-6.5	51.0	No	32	0	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		33.0	30.0	-3.0	51.0	Yes	74	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Asian		44.0	45.0	1.0	51.0	Yes	30	75	On Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	9	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		28.0	29.5	1.5	51.0	Yes	394	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		27.5	33.0	5.5	51.0	No	438	50	Below Target
High needs		25.5	31.0	5.5	51.0	No	96	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		30.0	27.0	-3.0	51.0	No	32	0	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		24.5	36.0	11.5	51.0	No	71	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Asian		43.5	59.5	16.0	51.0	Yes	30	100	Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	9	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		27.0	30.0	3.0	51.0	No	388	50	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	-	-
High needs	-	60.0	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	463	460	99	Yes	463	458	99	Yes	148	146	99	Yes
High needs	106	104	98	Yes	106	103	97	Yes	39	38	97	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	34	34	100	Yes	34	34	100	Yes	9	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	4	-	-	-	4	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	80	78	98	Yes	80	77	96	Yes	33	32	97	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Asian	31	31	100	Yes	31	31	100	Yes	7	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	5	-	-	-	5	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	6	-	-	-	6	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	9	-	-	-	9	-	-	-	5	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	410	408	100	Yes	410	406	99	Yes	134	133	99	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.