Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Parmenter
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Parmenter
Organization Information
District:Franklin (01010000)School type:Elementary School
School:Parmenter (01010032)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Greater BostonTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 88, Target = 96CPI = 88, Target = 96CPI = 88, Target = 96 93.2 82.5 88.0 5.5 96.0 96.6 6120750Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 72.5, Target = 91.7CPI = 72.5, Target = 91.7CPI = 72.5, Target = 91.7 85.7 64.9 72.5 7.6 91.7 92.9 346150Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 75, Target = 68.9CPI = 75, Target = 68.9CPI = 75, Target = 68.9 66.1 66.1 75.0 8.9 68.9 83.1 4136100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------11--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 59.8, Target = 88CPI = 59.8, Target = 88CPI = 59.8, Target = 88 79.5 52.1 59.8 7.7 88.0 89.8 352850Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------13--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 89.1, Target = 95.7CPI = 89.1, Target = 95.7CPI = 89.1, Target = 95.7 92.7 82.2 89.1 6.9 95.7 96.4 5617750Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91.1, Target = 95.8CPI = 91.1, Target = 95.8CPI = 91.1, Target = 95.8 92.8 87.6 91.1 3.5 95.8 96.4 7620750Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 82, Target = 90.4CPI = 82, Target = 90.4CPI = 82, Target = 90.4 83.5 72.9 82.0 9.1 90.4 91.8 756150Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 84, Target = 79.3CPI = 84, Target = 79.3CPI = 84, Target = 79.3 77.4 77.4 84.0 6.6 79.3 88.7 8136100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------11--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 69.6, Target = 89.1CPI = 69.6, Target = 89.1CPI = 69.6, Target = 89.1 81.3 56.9 69.6 12.7 89.1 90.7 642850Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------13--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 91, Target = 95.9CPI = 91, Target = 95.9CPI = 91, Target = 95.9 93.0 87.2 91.0 3.8 95.9 96.5 6917750Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 78.7, Target = 93.3CPI = 78.7, Target = 93.3CPI = 78.7, Target = 93.3 88.5 79.0 78.7 -0.3 93.3 94.3 436825No Change
High needs  78.3---- 89.2-21--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------10--
EL and Former EL -------5--
Students w/ disabilities -------12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 78.8, Target = 93.6CPI = 78.8, Target = 93.6CPI = 78.8, Target = 93.6 89.0 76.3 78.8 2.5 93.6 94.5 266050Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 13.5 15.020725 9.4 5.820725
High needs 8.3 6.6610 25.0 16.46125
Econ. Disadvantaged 9.5 5.6360 21.4 13.93625
EL and Former EL--11---11-
Students w/ disabilities 5.6 3.6280 38.9 28.62825
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--13---13-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--8---8-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 12.0 15.317725 9.4 5.117725
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 37.4 39.12070 5.9 1.920725
High needs 18.3 21.36125 18.3 6.66125
Econ. Disadvantaged 22.0 16.7360 7.3 5.63625
EL and Former EL--11---11-
Students w/ disabilities 5.6 3.6280 33.3 14.32825
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--13---13-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--8---8-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 34.0 37.31770 6.3 1.717725
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 19.1 11.8680 13.2 4.46825
High needs--21---21-
Econ. Disadvantaged--10---10-
EL and Former EL--5---5-
Students w/ disabilities--12---12-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 15.8 11.7600 15.8 5.06025
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51 43.0 58.0 15.0 51.0Yes149100Above Target
High needsSGP = 42.5, Target = 51SGP = 42.5, Target = 51SGP = 42.5, Target = 51 41.0 42.5 1.5 51.0Yes4675On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51 35.0 42.0 7.0 51.0Yes2575On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-9--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-24--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-9--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 60.5, Target = 51SGP = 60.5, Target = 51SGP = 60.5, Target = 51 42.0 60.5 18.5 51.0Yes128100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51 57.0 64.0 7.0 51.0Yes148100Above Target
High needsSGP = 69, Target = 51SGP = 69, Target = 51SGP = 69, Target = 51 48.0 69.0 21.0 51.0Yes45100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-24--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-9--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-24--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-9--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 62.5, Target = 51SGP = 62.5, Target = 51SGP = 62.5, Target = 51 54.5 62.5 8.0 51.0Yes128100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.06-
High needs- 60.06-
EL and Former EL- 60.06-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students212211100Yes212211100Yes6969100Yes
High needs656498Yes656498Yes2222100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged3939100Yes3939100Yes11---
EL and Former EL11---11---5---
Students w/ disabilities292897Yes292897Yes12---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian13---13---4---
Afr. Amer./Black6---6---2---
Hispanic/Latino8---8---2---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.4---4-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White18118099Yes18118099Yes6161100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles