Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Jefferson Elementary
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Jefferson Elementary
Organization Information
District:Franklin (01010000)School type:Elementary School
School:Jefferson Elementary (01010010)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Greater BostonTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 92.4, Target = 95.9CPI = 92.4, Target = 95.9CPI = 92.4, Target = 95.9 92.9 88.1 92.4 4.3 95.9 96.5 8118775On Target
High needsCPI = 77.3, Target = 87CPI = 77.3, Target = 87CPI = 77.3, Target = 87 77.7 70.3 77.3 7.0 87.0 88.9 584450Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------7--
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 75, Target = 85.1CPI = 75, Target = 85.1CPI = 75, Target = 85.1 74.5 65.5 75.0 9.5 85.1 87.3 774050Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------12--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 91.8, Target = 95.9CPI = 91.8, Target = 95.9CPI = 91.8, Target = 95.9 93.0 87.6 91.8 4.2 95.9 96.5 7117050Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 93.3, Target = 95.1CPI = 93.3, Target = 95.1CPI = 93.3, Target = 95.1 91.6 88.6 93.3 4.7 95.1 95.8 8618775On Target
High needsCPI = 73.9, Target = 83.6CPI = 73.9, Target = 83.6CPI = 73.9, Target = 83.6 71.8 69.4 73.9 4.5 83.6 85.9 414450Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------7--
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 71.3, Target = 80.8CPI = 71.3, Target = 80.8CPI = 71.3, Target = 80.8 67.0 65.0 71.3 6.3 80.8 83.5 684050Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------12--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 92.6, Target = 95.2CPI = 92.6, Target = 95.2CPI = 92.6, Target = 95.2 91.7 88.4 92.6 4.2 95.2 95.9 7817075On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 86.4, Target = 93.9CPI = 86.4, Target = 93.9CPI = 86.4, Target = 93.9 89.5 83.7 86.4 2.7 93.9 94.8 696650Improved Below Target
High needs -------18--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------2--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 85.6, Target = 94CPI = 85.6, Target = 94CPI = 85.6, Target = 94 89.7 83.9 85.6 1.7 94.0 94.9 525950Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 15.4 22.518725 5.8 2.118725
High needs 1.7 0.0440 19.0 9.14425
Econ. Disadvantaged--7---7-
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities 2.0 0.0400 22.0 10.04025
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--12---12-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--1---1-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 14.1 20.617025 5.9 2.417025
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 38.0 56.118725 6.3 5.318725
High needs 13.8 29.54425 19.0 22.7440
Econ. Disadvantaged--7---7-
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities 6.0 25.04025 22.0 25.0400
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--12---12-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--1---1-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 34.6 54.117025 5.9 5.91700
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 22.1 19.7660 7.0 3.06625
High needs--18---18-
Econ. Disadvantaged--2---2-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--16---16-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--1---1-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 21.1 16.9590 5.3 3.45925
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51 54.5 62.0 7.5 51.0Yes122100Above Target
High needsSGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51 60.5 59.0 -1.5 51.0No3175On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-6--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-3--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51 59.0 59.0 0.0 51.0Yes2775On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-8--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 54.0 60.0 6.0 51.0Yes110100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 68, Target = 51SGP = 68, Target = 51SGP = 68, Target = 51 56.0 68.0 12.0 51.0Yes122100Above Target
High needsSGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51 40.5 64.0 23.5 51.0Yes31100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-6--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-3--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51 39.0 64.0 25.0 51.0Yes27100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-8--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 68, Target = 51SGP = 68, Target = 51SGP = 68, Target = 51 55.0 68.0 13.0 51.0Yes110100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.04-
High needs- 60.04-
EL and Former EL- 60.04-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students19218998Yes19218998Yes6767100Yes
High needs474596Yes474596Yes19---
Econ. Disadvantaged8---8---3---
EL and Former EL3---3---2---
Students w/ disabilities434195Yes434195Yes17---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian14---14---5---
Afr. Amer./Black3---3---1---
Hispanic/Latino1---1---1---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.1---1-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White17317199Yes17317199Yes6060100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles