Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Cameron Middle School

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Cameron Middle School

Organization Information

District:

Framingham (01000000)

School type:

Middle School

School:

Cameron Middle School (01000302)

Grades served:

06,07,08

Region:

Greater Boston

Title I status:

Non-Title I School (NT)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		86.6	85.6	76.7	-8.9	92.2	93.3	10	493	0	Declined
High needs		78.4	78.0	66.3	-11.7	87.4	89.2	7	279	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		81.0	81.0	69.1	-11.9	82.6	90.5	7	178	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		81.4	63.4	58.3	-5.1	89.2	90.7	16	48	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities		65.9	67.6	52.2	-15.4	80.1	83.0	11	150	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		85.9	-	-	-	-	93.0	-	34	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		70.1	78.5	64.5	-14.0	82.6	85.1	8	95	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		89.5	87.8	81.2	-6.6	93.9	94.8	6	341	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		71.3	74.7	69.0	-5.7	83.3	85.7	19	494	0	Declined
High needs		57.5	63.1	55.7	-7.4	75.2	78.8	14	280	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		66.9	66.9	58.2	-8.7	69.7	83.5	14	179	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		57.6	52.4	43.2	-9.2	75.3	78.8	15	48	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities		44.3	50.2	41.1	-9.1	67.5	72.2	19	151	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		60.9	-	-	-	-	80.5	-	34	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		47.7	63.7	53.7	-10.0	69.5	73.9	13	95	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		76.4	77.7	73.8	-3.9	86.2	88.2	18	341	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		71.2	65.3	65.3	0.0	83.2	85.6	24	162	25	No Change
High needs		62.8	54.0	53.8	-0.2	78.3	81.4	20	80	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		54.8	54.8	53.9	-0.9	58.6	77.4	23	51	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		50.0	47.3	46.3	-1.0	70.8	75.0	30	47	25	No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		51.8	60.0	50.8	-9.2	71.9	75.9	30	30	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		77.1	66.5	68.3	1.8	86.6	88.6	14	120	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	7.8	5.3	493	0	8.5	17.2	493	0
High needs	3.3	1.4	279	0	14.9	26.2	279	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	4.2	1.7	178	0	12.5	26.4	178	0
EL and Former EL	2.4	0.0	48	0	24.4	31.3	48	0
Students w/ disabilities	1.6	0.7	150	0	25.6	40.0	150	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	34	-	-	-	34	-
Hispanic/Latino	8.2	5.3	95	0	11.8	33.7	95	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	14	-	-	-	14	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	7.6	5.3	341	0	7.2	12.3	341	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	17.2	12.6	494	0	17.2	24.7	494	0
High needs	7.0	5.7	280	0	28.4	38.9	280	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	7.1	6.1	179	0	24.9	37.4	179	0
EL and Former EL	2.4	4.2	48	25	34.1	52.1	48	0
Students w/ disabilities	4.0	2.0	151	0	42.4	57.0	151	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	34	-	-	-	34	-
Hispanic/Latino	11.9	8.4	95	0	29.8	42.1	95	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	15	-	-	-	15	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	18.1	13.5	341	0	13.8	19.6	341	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	2.3	4.3	162	25	20.9	22.2	162	0
High needs	0.0	0.0	80	0	32.9	35.0	80	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	0.0	0.0	51	0	29.8	37.3	51	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	47	0	43.5	46.8	47	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Hispanic/Latino	0.0	3.3	30	25	26.7	43.3	30	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	3.3	3.3	120	0	19.2	19.2	120	0

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		56.5	29.0	-27.5	51.0	No	437	0	Below Target
High needs		59.0	28.0	-31.0	51.0	No	241	0	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		59.0	27.5	-31.5	51.0	No	154	0	Below Target
EL and Former EL		56.0	39.0	-17.0	51.0	No	45	25	Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		59.0	28.0	-31.0	51.0	No	130	0	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	30	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		60.5	28.0	-32.5	51.0	No	87	0	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	12	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		56.0	29.0	-27.0	51.0	No	301	0	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		62.0	48.0	-14.0	51.0	No	435	50	Below Target
High needs		58.0	44.5	-13.5	51.0	No	240	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		58.0	46.0	-12.0	51.0	No	153	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		57.5	36.0	-21.5	51.0	No	44	25	Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		57.0	43.0	-14.0	51.0	No	127	50	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	28	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		62.0	49.0	-13.0	51.0	No	83	50	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	12	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		61.0	48.0	-13.0	51.0	No	305	50	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	13.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	13.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	13.00	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	525	518	99	Yes	525	522	99	Yes	167	166	99	Yes
High needs	307	301	98	Yes	307	305	99	Yes	85	84	99	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	200	199	100	Yes	200	200	100	Yes	56	55	98	Yes
EL and Former EL	60	57	95	Yes	60	60	100	Yes	3	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	160	156	98	Yes	160	158	99	Yes	49	48	98	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	8	-	-	-	8	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	37	37	100	Yes	37	37	100	Yes	6	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	107	105	98	Yes	107	106	99	Yes	34	34	100	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	16	-	-	-	16	-	-	-	5	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	356	352	99	Yes	356	354	99	Yes	120	120	100	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.