Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Potter Road

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Potter Road

Organization Information

District:

Framingham (01000000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

Potter Road (01000039)

Grades served:

K,01,02,03,04,05

Region:

Greater Boston

Title I status:

Non-Title I School (NT)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		87.9	88.6	83.9	-4.7	92.9	94.0	42	244	0	Declined
High needs		76.5	80.5	71.7	-8.8	86.3	88.3	30	127	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		80.7	80.7	74.6	-6.1	82.3	90.4	39	67	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		69.8	71.9	67.9	-4.0	82.4	84.9	40	77	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities		68.3	76.2	62.8	-13.4	81.5	84.2	45	45	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		89.4	88.1	83.5	-4.6	93.8	94.7	24	199	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		88.4	84.8	83.7	-1.1	93.2	94.2	42	245	25	No Change
High needs		79.9	75.9	73.0	-2.9	88.3	90.0	37	128	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		75.0	75.0	77.9	2.9	77.1	87.5	55	68	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		83.3	72.3	68.6	-3.7	90.3	91.7	34	78	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities		73.3	68.0	61.4	-6.6	84.4	86.7	40	46	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		89.8	85.6	84.1	-1.5	94.1	94.9	29	200	25	No Change

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		85.9	80.2	81.3	1.1	91.8	93.0	51	79	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		79.0	69.8	64.5	-5.3	86.0	89.5	40	31	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	20	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	20	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		85.9	80.9	82.2	1.3	91.8	93.0	36	66	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	16.7	17.6	244	0	3.7	9.8	244	0
High needs	3.6	4.7	127	25	7.3	18.9	127	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	6.6	7.5	67	25	11.5	19.4	67	0
EL and Former EL	1.8	1.3	77	0	14.3	23.4	77	0
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	2.2	45	25	9.3	26.7	45	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	15	-	-	-	15	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	16.7	15.1	199	0	4.4	10.1	199	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	26.0	28.6	245	25	7.4	8.6	245	0
High needs	10.9	12.5	128	25	14.5	15.6	128	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	9.8	16.2	68	25	14.8	11.8	68	25
EL and Former EL	12.5	11.5	78	0	17.9	20.5	78	0
Students w/ disabilities	2.3	6.5	46	25	23.3	23.9	46	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	15	-	-	-	15	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	25.6	28.0	200	0	6.7	8.0	200	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	14.3	13.9	79	0	1.6	8.9	79	0
High needs	0.0	6.5	31	25	3.4	19.4	31	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	20	-	-	-	20	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	20	-	-	-	20	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	12.8	12.1	66	0	0.0	7.6	66	0

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		65.0	42.0	-23.0	51.0	No	155	50	Below Target
High needs		71.0	38.0	-33.0	51.0	No	76	25	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		66.5	40.5	-26.0	51.0	No	42	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		57.5	40.5	-17.0	51.0	No	46	50	Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		46.5	33.0	-13.5	51.0	No	29	25	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	10	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		63.0	41.0	-22.0	51.0	No	131	50	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		66.0	46.0	-20.0	51.0	No	155	50	Below Target
High needs		60.5	46.0	-14.5	51.0	No	76	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		59.0	46.0	-13.0	51.0	Yes	42	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		58.0	50.0	-8.0	51.0	No	46	50	Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		45.0	45.0	0.0	51.0	No	29	50	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	10	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		66.0	50.0	-16.0	51.0	No	131	50	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	74.0	60.0	103.00	25
High needs	74.0	60.0	103.00	25
EL and Former EL	74.0	60.0	103.00	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	260	255	98	Yes	261	257	98	Yes	83	80	96	Yes
High needs	140	137	98	Yes	141	139	99	Yes	33	32	97	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	75	72	96	Yes	75	73	97	Yes	22	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	86	84	98	Yes	87	86	99	Yes	22	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	47	46	98	Yes	47	47	100	Yes	10	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	12	-	-	-	12	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	10	-	-	-	10	-	-	-	3	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	15	-	-	-	15	-	-	-	6	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	12	-	-	-	12	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	211	206	98	Yes	212	208	98	Yes	69	66	96	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.