Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Charlotte A Dunning

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Charlotte A Dunning

Organization Information

District:

Framingham (01000000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

Charlotte A Dunning (01000007)

Grades served:

K,01,02,03,04,05

Region:

Greater Boston

Title I status:

Non-Title I School (NT)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 1

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		83.0	90.5	86.9	-3.6	90.1	91.5	56	240	0	Declined
High needs		68.6	82.2	75.7	-6.5	81.7	84.3	49	107	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		83.0	83.0	78.6	-4.4	84.4	91.5	58	49	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		66.8	73.9	65.6	-8.3	80.6	83.4	36	45	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities		65.2	80.3	73.7	-6.6	79.7	82.6	74	58	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		85.6	91.4	83.8	-7.6	91.6	92.8	19	37	0	Declined
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	21	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		88.7	92.2	87.7	-4.5	93.4	94.4	48	158	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		81.4	86.1	84.2	-1.9	89.2	90.7	45	240	25	No Change
High needs		67.3	76.6	73.1	-3.5	80.9	83.7	38	107	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		70.5	70.5	73.0	2.5	73.0	85.3	36	49	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		67.3	68.8	63.9	-4.9	80.9	83.7	19	45	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities		62.2	75.0	69.0	-6.0	78.0	81.1	63	58	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		89.4	90.1	85.1	-5.0	93.8	94.7	14	37	0	Declined
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	21	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		87.5	90.3	85.4	-4.9	92.7	93.8	36	158	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		72.5	79.3	76.4	-2.9	84.0	86.3	37	70	0	Declined
High needs		48.1	63.7	61.3	-2.4	69.7	74.1	30	31	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	20	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		83.1	87.2	77.3	-9.9	90.1	91.6	20	43	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	20.8	16.7	240	0	2.3	7.1	240	0
High needs	5.3	5.6	107	0	5.3	15.0	107	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	4.5	8.2	49	25	6.8	14.3	49	0
EL and Former EL	4.5	2.2	45	0	11.4	24.4	45	0
Students w/ disabilities	4.3	5.2	58	25	4.3	17.2	58	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	21.1	13.5	37	0	2.6	8.1	37	0
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	21	-	-	-	21	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	23.4	20.3	158	0	0.7	6.3	158	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	37.6	30.8	240	0	6.8	7.9	240	0
High needs	22.3	12.1	107	0	13.8	16.8	107	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	22.7	12.2	49	0	22.7	18.4	49	25
EL and Former EL	13.6	6.7	45	0	22.7	26.7	45	0
Students w/ disabilities	23.4	10.3	58	0	12.8	24.1	58	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	31.6	24.3	37	0	5.3	5.4	37	0
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	21	-	-	-	21	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	45.3	37.3	158	0	4.4	7.6	158	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	16.0	8.6	70	0	8.0	8.6	70	0
High needs	9.7	0.0	31	0	19.4	16.1	31	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	20	-	-	-	20	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	15	-	-	-	15	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	20.5	11.6	43	0	5.1	9.3	43	0

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		59.0	42.5	-16.5	51.0	No	144	50	Below Target
High needs		57.0	44.0	-13.0	51.0	No	59	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		58.0	52.0	-6.0	51.0	No	27	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	21	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		57.0	36.0	-21.0	51.0	No	32	25	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		53.0	36.0	-17.0	51.0	No	20	25	Below Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	9	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	10	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		59.0	43.0	-16.0	51.0	No	100	50	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		58.0	33.5	-24.5	51.0	No	144	25	Below Target
High needs		34.0	25.0	-9.0	51.0	No	59	0	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		30.0	39.0	9.0	51.0	No	27	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	21	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		34.0	16.0	-18.0	51.0	No	32	0	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		67.0	40.0	-27.0	51.0	No	20	25	Below Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	9	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	10	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		63.0	34.0	-29.0	51.0	No	100	25	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	84.5	60.0	72.00	25
High needs	84.5	60.0	72.00	25
EL and Former EL	84.5	60.0	72.00	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	252	250	99	Yes	252	250	99	Yes	75	75	100	Yes
High needs	115	113	98	Yes	115	113	98	Yes	34	34	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	53	53	100	Yes	53	53	100	Yes	14	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	50	50	100	Yes	50	50	100	Yes	9	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	60	58	97	Yes	60	58	97	Yes	20	20	100	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	39	39	100	Yes	39	39	100	Yes	16	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	13	-	-	-	13	-	-	-	7	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	24	-	-	-	24	-	-	-	6	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	13	-	-	-	13	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	163	162	99	Yes	163	162	99	Yes	44	44	100	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.