Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Brophy

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Brophy

Organization Information

District:

Framingham (01000000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

Brophy (01000006)

Grades served:

K,01,02,03,04,05

Region:

Greater Boston

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 3

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		69.8	74.0	64.1	-9.9	82.4	84.9	4	239	0	Declined
High needs		58.5	66.1	52.6	-13.5	75.8	79.3	1	161	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		64.5	64.5	52.2	-12.3	67.5	82.3	1	113	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		47.3	59.8	45.8	-14.0	69.3	73.7	2	100	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities		50.8	54.4	43.4	-11.0	71.3	75.4	6	57	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	16	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		55.9	62.9	47.2	-15.7	74.3	78.0	1	127	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		89.6	91.5	84.3	-7.2	93.9	94.8	29	75	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		69.7	68.5	66.1	-2.4	82.3	84.9	5	239	25	No Change
High needs		58.7	60.4	56.5	-3.9	75.9	79.4	3	161	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		57.7	57.7	52.7	-5.0	61.2	78.9	2	113	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		52.5	54.1	53.0	-1.1	72.3	76.3	5	100	25	No Change
Students w/ disabilities		52.1	51.5	44.3	-7.2	72.1	76.1	8	57	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	16	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		56.9	56.4	50.0	-6.4	74.9	78.5	4	127	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		87.9	87.3	87.7	0.4	92.9	94.0	48	75	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		72.7	65.9	68.5	2.6	84.1	86.4	21	73	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		58.3	61.8	61.1	-0.7	75.7	79.2	29	54	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		61.3	61.3	60.0	-1.3	64.5	80.7	36	45	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		45.0	50.0	59.3	9.3	67.9	72.5	63	35	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		56.3	-	-	-	-	78.2	-	20	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		58.8	55.4	56.8	1.4	76.0	79.4	41	48	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	14	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	7.9	6.3	239	0	14.9	29.3	239	0
High needs	3.4	3.7	161	0	20.8	41.6	161	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	1.8	3.5	113	25	21.9	42.5	113	0
EL and Former EL	1.2	0.0	100	0	27.4	49.0	100	0
Students w/ disabilities	3.9	3.5	57	0	37.3	57.9	57	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	16	-	-	-	16	-
Hispanic/Latino	0.8	2.4	127	25	24.2	49.6	127	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	16.9	10.7	75	0	0.0	4.0	75	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	14.8	15.5	239	0	23.8	27.2	239	0
High needs	8.9	11.8	161	25	29.9	37.3	161	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	5.1	9.7	113	25	31.6	41.6	113	0
EL and Former EL	6.5	8.0	100	25	38.0	41.0	100	0
Students w/ disabilities	9.8	10.5	57	0	47.1	56.1	57	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	16	-	-	-	16	-
Hispanic/Latino	3.9	3.1	127	0	35.9	43.3	127	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	30.5	30.7	75	0	6.8	8.0	75	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	10.6	16.4	73	25	21.2	19.2	73	0
High needs	7.8	7.4	54	0	27.5	24.1	54	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	7.5	4.4	45	0	25.0	22.2	45	25
EL and Former EL	3.8	5.7	35	25	38.5	22.9	35	25
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	20	-	-	-	20	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Hispanic/Latino	7.1	6.3	48	0	33.3	27.1	48	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	14	-	-	-	14	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		59.0	26.0	-33.0	51.0	No	145	0	Below Target
High needs		59.0	23.0	-36.0	51.0	No	93	0	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		60.0	25.5	-34.5	51.0	No	72	0	Below Target
EL and Former EL		58.0	21.0	-37.0	51.0	No	51	0	Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		73.5	23.0	-50.5	51.0	No	37	0	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	10	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		58.0	19.0	-39.0	51.0	No	76	0	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		57.5	46.0	-11.5	51.0	No	43	50	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		35.0	21.0	-14.0	51.0	No	148	0	Below Target
High needs		33.0	19.0	-14.0	51.0	No	96	0	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		30.5	17.0	-13.5	51.0	No	74	0	Below Target
EL and Former EL		30.5	18.0	-12.5	51.0	No	54	0	Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		46.0	17.0	-29.0	51.0	No	37	0	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	10	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		29.0	17.0	-12.0	51.0	No	79	0	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		38.0	29.0	-9.0	51.0	No	43	0	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	79.0	60.0	129.00	25
High needs	79.0	60.0	129.00	25
EL and Former EL	79.0	60.0	129.00	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	275	273	99	Yes	277	276	100	Yes	82	82	100	Yes
High needs	196	195	99	Yes	198	198	100	Yes	63	63	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	134	134	100	Yes	135	135	100	Yes	50	50	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	128	127	99	Yes	130	130	100	Yes	42	42	100	Yes
Students w/ disabilities	62	61	98	Yes	63	63	100	Yes	21	21	100	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	12	-	-	-	12	-	-	-	6	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	20	-	-	-	20	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	154	154	100	Yes	156	156	100	Yes	56	56	100	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	11	-	-	-	11	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	78	77	99	Yes	78	77	99	Yes	14	-	-	-

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.