Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Morse Pond School

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Morse Pond School

Organization Information

District:

Falmouth (00960000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

Morse Pond School (00960305)

Grades served:

05,06

Region:

Southeast

Title I status:

Non-Title I School (NT)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		92.8	89.5	88.8	-0.7	95.8	96.4	65	592	25	No Change
High needs		86.0	78.1	75.4	-2.7	91.8	93.0	47	230	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		82.9	82.9	80.9	-2.0	84.3	91.5	71	148	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		79.7	64.6	61.4	-3.2	88.2	89.9	41	118	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		83.3	-	-	-	-	91.7	-	29	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		81.3	-	-	-	-	90.7	-	27	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		85.4	85.1	79.7	-5.4	91.5	92.7	37	32	0	Declined
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White		93.6	90.2	90.7	0.5	96.3	96.8	65	488	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		86.3	83.6	83.8	0.2	92.0	93.2	43	593	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		74.9	68.4	68.1	-0.3	85.4	87.5	21	231	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		71.8	71.8	71.0	-0.8	74.2	85.9	28	149	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		65.4	57.0	53.2	-3.8	79.8	82.7	19	119	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		75.0	-	-	-	-	87.5	-	30	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		78.8	-	-	-	-	89.4	-	27	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		81.3	76.4	77.3	0.9	89.1	90.7	28	32	50	Improved Below Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White		87.4	84.9	85.7	0.8	92.7	93.7	37	488	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		81.6	79.6	79.3	-0.3	89.3	90.8	45	304	25	No Change
High needs		68.4	69.2	64.3	-4.9	81.6	84.2	39	122	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		71.3	71.3	68.2	-3.1	73.7	85.7	56	77	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		64.6	62.3	54.8	-7.5	79.4	82.3	30	57	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	17	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White		82.3	80.8	82.0	1.2	89.7	91.2	35	252	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	20.7	25.0	592	25	5.7	7.8	592	0
High needs	6.8	9.6	230	25	14.0	19.1	230	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	7.7	14.2	148	25	9.7	16.2	148	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Students w/ disabilities	2.7	1.7	118	0	25.2	31.4	118	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Asian	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	29	-	-	-	29	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	27	-	-	-	27	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	24.3	12.5	32	0	8.1	21.9	32	0
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
White	20.8	27.3	488	25	4.7	5.3	488	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	25.8	33.6	593	25	9.4	9.6	593	0
High needs	12.3	13.9	231	25	20.9	22.5	231	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	14.9	16.1	149	0	17.5	20.1	149	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Students w/ disabilities	5.4	6.7	119	25	33.3	38.7	119	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Asian	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	30	-	-	-	30	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	27	-	-	-	27	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	18.9	18.8	32	0	16.2	15.6	32	0
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
White	27.3	36.5	488	25	8.5	7.8	488	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	12.8	16.8	304	25	7.1	10.2	304	0
High needs	3.4	3.3	122	0	14.7	22.1	122	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	3.7	3.9	77	0	14.6	20.8	77	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Students w/ disabilities	1.7	1.8	57	0	20.3	33.3	57	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	17	-	-	-	17	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	14	-	-	-	14	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	14	-	-	-	14	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
White	12.8	19.0	252	25	6.0	7.9	252	0

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		48.0	51.0	3.0	51.0	No	571	75	On Target
High needs		36.0	38.5	2.5	51.0	No	216	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		39.0	48.0	9.0	51.0	No	139	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	9	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		26.0	32.0	6.0	51.0	No	108	50	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	10	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	25	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	25	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		53.0	35.0	-18.0	51.0	No	31	25	Below Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
White		47.0	53.0	6.0	51.0	Yes	475	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		51.0	54.0	3.0	51.0	No	571	75	On Target
High needs		43.0	44.0	1.0	51.0	No	217	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		48.5	46.0	-2.5	51.0	No	140	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	9	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		32.0	34.0	2.0	51.0	No	109	50	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	10	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	26	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	25	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		53.0	59.0	6.0	51.0	No	31	75	On Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
White		50.0	52.0	2.0	51.0	No	474	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	2.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	2.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	2.00	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	613	609	99	Yes	614	610	99	Yes	316	311	98	Yes
High needs	243	242	100	Yes	244	243	100	Yes	128	126	98	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	158	157	99	Yes	159	158	99	Yes	82	80	98	Yes
EL and Former EL	17	-	-	-	17	-	-	-	10	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	120	120	100	Yes	121	121	100	Yes	58	57	98	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	4	-	-	-	4	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Asian	12	-	-	-	12	-	-	-	5	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	32	32	100	Yes	33	33	100	Yes	18	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	30	30	100	Yes	30	30	100	Yes	15	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	35	34	97	Yes	35	34	97	Yes	15	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
White	499	496	99	Yes	499	496	99	Yes	261	256	98	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.