Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Samuel Watson
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Samuel Watson
Organization Information
District:Fall River (00950000)School type:Elementary School
School:Samuel Watson (00950145)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Commissioner's DistrictsTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 4
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 72, Target = 76.8CPI = 72, Target = 76.8CPI = 72, Target = 76.8 60.3 63.5 72.0 8.5 76.8 80.2 1112750Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 70, Target = 75.7CPI = 70, Target = 75.7CPI = 70, Target = 75.7 58.4 58.5 70.0 11.5 75.7 79.2 2410550Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 70.8, Target = 62.2CPI = 70.8, Target = 62.2CPI = 70.8, Target = 62.2 58.8 58.8 70.8 12.0 62.2 79.4 25101100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------11--
Students w/ disabilities -------20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------9--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 71, Target = 70.8CPI = 71, Target = 70.8 50.0 55.7 71.0 15.3 70.8 75.0 443175On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 73.3, Target = 78.3CPI = 73.3, Target = 78.3CPI = 73.3, Target = 78.3 62.8 66.1 73.3 7.2 78.3 81.4 47250Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 66.5, Target = 74.6CPI = 66.5, Target = 74.6CPI = 66.5, Target = 74.6 56.5 55.6 66.5 10.9 74.6 78.3 512650Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 65.6, Target = 73.5CPI = 65.6, Target = 73.5CPI = 65.6, Target = 73.5 54.6 52.1 65.6 13.5 73.5 77.3 1310450Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 67.5, Target = 57.2CPI = 67.5, Target = 57.2CPI = 67.5, Target = 57.2 53.3 53.3 67.5 14.2 57.2 76.7 17100100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------11--
Students w/ disabilities -------19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------8--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 70.2, Target = 70.8CPI = 70.2, Target = 70.8 50.0 49.3 70.2 20.9 70.8 75.0 373175On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 65.6, Target = 75.3CPI = 65.6, Target = 75.3CPI = 65.6, Target = 75.3 57.6 56.3 65.6 9.3 75.3 78.8 27250Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 59.8, Target = 79.5CPI = 59.8, Target = 79.5CPI = 59.8, Target = 79.5 64.8 51.5 59.8 8.3 79.5 82.4 135150Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 62.2, Target = 77.5CPI = 62.2, Target = 77.5CPI = 62.2, Target = 77.5 61.4 47.0 62.2 15.2 77.5 80.7 334150Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 63.1, Target = 53.5CPI = 63.1, Target = 53.5CPI = 63.1, Target = 53.5 49.3 49.3 63.1 13.8 53.5 74.7 4440100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------5--
Students w/ disabilities -------7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 60, Target = 84.1CPI = 60, Target = 84.1CPI = 60, Target = 84.1 72.7 50.9 60.0 9.1 84.1 86.4 33050Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 0.7 0.812725 24.4 10.212725
High needs 0.9 1.010525 30.2 11.410525
Econ. Disadvantaged 1.0 1.01010 31.0 10.910125
EL and Former EL--11---11-
Students w/ disabilities--20---20-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--9---9-
Hispanic/Latino 2.9 0.0310 31.4 6.53125
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--11---11-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 0.0 0.0720 21.1 9.77225
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 3.0 4.812625 34.1 23.012625
High needs 2.8 4.810425 39.6 24.010425
Econ. Disadvantaged 3.0 5.010025 37.0 22.010025
EL and Former EL--11---11-
Students w/ disabilities--19---19-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--8---8-
Hispanic/Latino 2.9 3.23125 42.9 16.13125
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--11---11-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 0.0 1.47225 35.5 25.07225
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 0.0 0.0510 27.5 31.4510
High needs 0.0 0.0410 34.1 31.7410
Econ. Disadvantaged 0.0 0.0400 29.7 30.0400
EL and Former EL--5---5-
Students w/ disabilities--7---7-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--13---13-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 0.0 0.0300 31.0 26.73025
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 50.5, Target = 51SGP = 50.5, Target = 51 55.0 50.5 -4.5 51.0Yes8475On Target
High needsSGP = 51, Target = 51SGP = 51, Target = 51 56.5 51.0 -5.5 51.0Yes6975On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 51, Target = 51SGP = 51, Target = 51 55.0 51.0 -4.0 51.0Yes6775On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-6--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-3--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-7--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-21--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 49.5, Target = 51SGP = 49.5, Target = 51SGP = 49.5, Target = 51 54.0 49.5 -4.5 51.0Yes4675On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 67.5, Target = 51SGP = 67.5, Target = 51SGP = 67.5, Target = 51 52.0 67.5 15.5 51.0Yes84100Above Target
High needsSGP = 67, Target = 51SGP = 67, Target = 51SGP = 67, Target = 51 49.5 67.0 17.5 51.0Yes69100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 68, Target = 51SGP = 68, Target = 51SGP = 68, Target = 51 48.0 68.0 20.0 51.0Yes67100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-6--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-3--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-6--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-21--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 51 56.5 63.0 6.5 51.0No47100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.010-
High needs- 60.010-
EL and Former EL- 60.010-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students144144100Yes144144100Yes5858100Yes
High needs122122100Yes122122100Yes4848100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged118118100Yes118118100Yes4747100Yes
EL and Former EL14---15---6---
Students w/ disabilities29---28---10---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian5---5---2---
Afr. Amer./Black11---10---4---
Hispanic/Latino3737100Yes3838100Yes16---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.12---12---3---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White7979100Yes7979100Yes3333100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles