Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Easton Middle School

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Easton Middle School

Organization Information

District:

Easton (00880000)

School type:

Middle School

School:

Easton Middle School (00880405)

Grades served:

06,07,08

Region:

Southeast

Title I status:

Title I School (TA)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		94.9	93.7	96.0	2.3	97.0	97.5	87	845	75	On Target
High needs		81.7	81.8	87.1	5.3	89.3	90.9	87	225	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		87.1	87.1	92.1	5.0	88.2	93.6	91	89	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	16	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		78.6	74.4	82.5	8.1	87.5	89.3	86	160	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	23	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		84.9	88.3	91.9	3.6	91.2	92.5	90	43	75	On Target
Hispanic/Latino		87.9	87.1	92.2	5.1	92.9	94.0	90	32	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	23	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White		95.6	94.2	96.4	2.2	97.4	97.8	85	721	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		87.5	87.8	90.6	2.8	92.7	93.8	89	843	75	On Target
High needs		68.0	68.7	72.4	3.7	81.3	84.0	86	222	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		75.9	75.9	82.3	6.4	77.9	88.0	94	86	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	16	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		62.9	58.5	65.9	7.4	78.4	81.5	89	160	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	23	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		75.0	73.9	80.4	6.5	85.4	87.5	92	42	75	On Target
Hispanic/Latino		72.4	85.7	84.4	-1.3	83.9	86.2	92	32	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	23	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White		88.5	88.8	91.6	2.8	93.3	94.3	89	720	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		81.3	82.0	86.8	4.8	89.1	90.7	90	268	100	Above Target
High needs		61.2	65.1	71.6	6.5	77.4	80.6	91	74	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		69.6	69.6	77.9	8.3	72.1	84.8	95	35	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		58.7	56.4	64.3	7.9	75.9	79.4	89	49	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White		83.3	82.6	87.5	4.9	90.3	91.7	88	236	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	22.7	18.8	845	0	3.6	1.1	845	25
High needs	5.4	5.8	225	0	11.5	4.0	225	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	10.7	12.4	89	25	8.9	1.1	89	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	16	-	-	-	16	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.6	1.3	160	25	16.4	5.6	160	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Asian	-	-	23	-	-	-	23	-
Afr. Amer./Black	6.7	9.3	43	25	8.9	4.7	43	25
Hispanic/Latino	20.0	28.1	32	25	11.4	0.0	32	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	23	-	-	-	23	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
White	22.8	19.0	721	0	2.8	1.0	721	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	36.0	45.2	843	25	7.6	4.2	843	25
High needs	11.2	15.8	222	25	25.0	15.3	222	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	15.2	23.3	86	25	16.1	5.8	86	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	16	-	-	-	16	-
Students w/ disabilities	5.7	8.8	160	25	36.4	20.6	160	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Asian	-	-	23	-	-	-	23	-
Afr. Amer./Black	17.8	26.2	42	25	20.0	11.9	42	25
Hispanic/Latino	37.1	50.0	32	25	11.4	6.3	32	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	23	-	-	-	23	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
White	36.4	45.8	720	25	6.6	3.2	720	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	6.6	14.6	268	25	7.2	4.1	268	25
High needs	2.8	2.7	74	0	21.7	13.5	74	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	4.3	2.9	35	0	15.2	8.6	35	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Students w/ disabilities	1.4	2.0	49	25	32.9	20.4	49	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
White	6.1	13.6	236	25	6.5	3.4	236	25

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		58.0	56.0	-2.0	51.0	Yes	828	75	On Target
High needs		51.0	57.0	6.0	51.0	No	212	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		54.0	51.0	-3.0	51.0	No	85	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	16	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		44.0	59.5	15.5	51.0	Yes	150	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	23	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		53.0	57.0	4.0	51.0	No	43	75	On Target
Hispanic/Latino		47.0	72.0	25.0	51.0	Yes	32	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	22	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
White		57.0	55.0	-2.0	51.0	Yes	705	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		58.0	66.0	8.0	51.0	Yes	826	100	Above Target
High needs		55.0	66.0	11.0	51.0	No	210	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		51.0	63.0	12.0	51.0	Yes	83	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	16	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		52.5	67.5	15.0	51.0	No	150	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	23	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		52.0	64.5	12.5	51.0	Yes	42	100	Above Target
Hispanic/Latino		67.0	59.5	-7.5	51.0	No	32	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	22	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
White		59.0	67.0	8.0	51.0	Yes	704	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	3.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	3.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	3.00	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	863	858	99	Yes	862	857	99	Yes	281	274	98	Yes
High needs	236	233	99	Yes	234	230	98	Yes	82	77	97	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	96	96	100	Yes	95	93	98	Yes	41	38	97	Yes
EL and Former EL	17	-	-	-	17	-	-	-	3	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	164	161	98	Yes	163	161	99	Yes	51	49	96	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Asian	25	-	-	-	25	-	-	-	6	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	44	44	100	Yes	44	43	98	Yes	12	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	33	33	100	Yes	33	33	100	Yes	11	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	23	-	-	-	23	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
White	735	730	99	Yes	734	730	99	Yes	246	241	98	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.